Objective: To establish an automated visual acuity test (AVAT) for infants, based on preferential looking technique and controlled with remote eye tracking. To validate the AVAT in a group of healthy children. To compare AVAT visual acuity (VA) values with corresponding VA values acquired with standard tests (ST). Methods: ST, adapted for age (Keeler Acuity Cards in preverbal children and LEA symbols in verbal children), was performed to obtain monocular VA in a group of 36 healthy children. During AVAT, 9 different stimuli with grating circles that matched spatial frequencies of 9 Keeler Acuity Cards (ranging between 0.29 and 14.5 cycles per degree) were projected on a screen. Three repetitions of each stimulus were shown during 9-s intervals, interchanging with an attention grabber. The remote eye tracker was used to evaluate the proportion of time a child spent looking at each grating circle compared to a homogeneous gray background that matched the grating stimuli in average luminance. From this proportion of time, child’s binocular VA was evaluated. Results: Ninety-seven percent (35/36) of healthy children successfully completed ST and AVAT. There was an agreement between the results of an ST and AVAT, with Lin’s concordance coefficient being 0.53 (95% CI = 0.31–0.72). A tendency was observed toward VA overestimation on AVAT for children with VA >0.4 logMAR on ST and toward VA underestimation on AVAT for children with VA ≤0.4 logMAR on ST. Conclusions: AVAT requires a minimally skilled investigator. The evaluation of better eye monocular VA on ST and binocular VA on AVAT was comparable for healthy children.

1.
Hensch
TK
,
Quinlan
EM
.
Critical periods in amblyopia
.
Vis Neurosci
.
2018 Jul
;
35
:
E014
. .
2.
Sloot
F
,
Hoeve
HL
,
de Kroon
ML
,
Goedegebure
A
,
Carlton
J
,
Griffiths
HJ
, et al.
Inventory of current EU paediatric vision and hearing screening programmes
.
J Med Screen
.
2015 Jun
;
22
(
2
):
55
64
. .
3.
Wallace
DK
,
Morse
CL
,
Melia
M
,
Sprunger
DT
,
Repka
MX
,
Lee
KA
, et al.
Pediatric eye evaluations preferred practice pattern®. Vision screening in the primary care and community setting; II. Comprehensive ophthalmic examination
.
Ophthalmology
.
2018 Jan
;
125
(
1
):
P184
227
.
4.
Mohn
G
,
van Hof-van Duin
J
,
Fetter
WP
,
de Groot
L
,
Hage
M
,
Hage
M
.
Acuity assessment of non-verbal infants and children: clinical experience with the acuity card procedure
.
Dev Med Child Neurol
.
1988
;
30
(
2
):
232
44
. .
5.
Preston
KL
,
McDonald
M
,
Sebris
SL
,
Dobson
V
,
Teller
DY
.
Validation of the acuity card procedure for assessment of infants with ocular disorders
.
Ophthalmology
.
1987 Jun
;
94
(
6
):
644
53
. .
6.
McDonald
MA
,
Dobson
V
,
Sebris
SL
,
Baitch
L
,
Varner
D
,
Teller
DY
.
The acuity card procedure: a rapid test of infant acuity
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
1985
;
26
(
8
):
1158
62
.
7.
Fantz
RL
.
Pattern vision in young infants
.
Psychol Rec
.
1958
;
8
(
2
):
43
7
. .
8.
Dobson
V
,
Schwartz
TL
,
Sandstrom
DJ
,
Michel
L
.
Binocular visual acuity of neonates: the acuity card procedure
.
Dev Med Child Neurol
.
2008 Nov 12
;
29
(
2
):
199
206
. .
9.
Mohn
G
,
van Hof-van Duin
J
,
Fetter
WP
,
de Groot
L
,
Hage
M
,
Hage
M
.
Acuity assessment of non-verbal infants and children: clinical experience with the acuity card procedure
.
Dev Med Child Neurol
.
1988
;
30
(
2
):
232
44
. .
10.
Kelly
JP
,
Phillips
JO
,
Weiss
AH
.
Does eye velocity due to infantile nystagmus deprive visual acuity development?
J AAPOS
.
2018 Feb
;
22
(
1
):
50
5
.
11.
Cavallini
A
,
Fazzi
E
,
Viviani
V
,
Astori
MG
,
Zaverio
S
,
Bianchi
PE
, et al.
Visual acuity in the first two years of life in healthy term newborns: an experience with the Teller acuity cards
.
Funct Neurol
.
2002 Apr–Jun
;
17
(
2
):
87
92
..
12.
Sturm
V
,
Cassel
D
,
Eizenman
M
.
Objective estimation of visual acuity with preferential looking
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
2011 Feb
;
52
(
2
):
708
. .
13.
Hathibelagal
AR
,
Leat
SJ
,
Irving
EL
,
Nandakumar
K
,
Eizenman
M
.
Measuring infant visual acuity with gaze tracker monitored visual fixation
.
Optom Vis Sci
.
2015 Jul
;
92
(
7
):
823
33
. .
14.
Jones
PR
,
Kalwarowsky
S
,
Atkinson
J
,
Braddick
OJ
,
Nardini
M
.
Automated measurement of resolution acuity in infants using remote eye-tracking
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
2014 Dec 12
;
55
(
12
):
8102
10
. .
15.
Barsingerhorn
AD
,
Boonstra
FN
,
Goossens
J
.
Saccade latencies during a preferential looking task and objective scoring of grating acuity in children with and without visual impairments
.
Acta Ophthalmol
.
2019 Sep
;
97
(
6
):
616
25
. .
16.
Livingstone
I
,
Butler
L
,
Misanjo
E
,
Lok
A
,
Middleton
D
,
Wilson
JW
, et al.
Testing pediatric acuity with an iPad: validation of “Peekaboo Vision” in Malawi and the UK
.
Transl Vis Sci Technol
.
2019 Jan 9
;
8
(
1
):
8
. .
17.
Kooiker
MJ
,
Pel
JJ
,
Verbunt
HJ
,
de Wit
GC
,
van Genderen
MM
,
van der Steen
J
.
Quantification of visual function assessment using remote eye tracking in children: validity and applicability
.
Acta Ophthalmol
.
2016 Sep
;
94
(
6
):
599
608
. .
18.
Kooiker
MJG
,
Verbunt
HJM
,
van der Steen
J
,
Pel
JJM
.
Combining visual sensory functions and visuospatial orienting functions in children with visual pathology: a longitudinal study
.
Brain Dev
.
2019 Feb
;
41
(
2
):
135
49
. .
19.
Dalrymple
KA
,
Manner
MD
,
Harmelink
KA
,
Teska
EP
,
Elison
JT
.
An examination of recording accuracy and precision from eye tracking data from toddlerhood to adulthood
.
Front Psychol
.
2018 May
;
9
:
803
. .
20.
Salomao
SR
,
Ventura
DF
.
Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech-Teller acuity cards
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
1995
;
36
(
3
):
657
70
.
21.
Pan
Y
,
Tarczy-Hornoch
K
,
Cotter
S
,
Wen
G
.
Visual acuity norms in preschool children: the multi-ethnic pediatric eye disease study
.
Optom Vis Sci
.
2009
;
86
(
6
):
607
12
.
22.
Langaas
T
.
Visual acuity in children: the development of crowded and single letter acuities
.
Scand J Optom Vis Sci
.
2011
;
4
(
2
):
20
6
. .
23.
Visual acuity
. In:
Cantor
LB
,
Rapuano
CJ
,
Cioffi
G
, editors.
2018–2019 basic and clinical science course, section 03: clinical optics
.
San Francisco
:
American Academy of Opthalmology
;
2017
. p.
78
81
.
24.
Atkinson
J
.
Paediatric vision testing
. In:
Atkinson
J
, editor.
The developing visual brain. Oxford psychology series
.
Oxford, NY
:
Oxford University Press
;
2002
. p.
7
27
.
25.
Mayer
DL
,
Beiser
AS
,
Warner
AF
,
Pratt
EM
,
Raye
KN
,
Lang
JM
.
Monocular acuity norms for the Teller acuity cards between ages one month and four years
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
1995
;
36
(
3
):
671
85
.
26.
Polevoy
C
,
Muckle
G
,
Séguin
JR
,
Ouellet
E
,
Saint-Amour
D
.
Similarities and differences between behavioral and electrophysiological visual acuity thresholds in healthy infants during the second half of the first year of life
.
Doc Ophthalmol
.
2017 Apr
;
134
(
2
):
99
110
. .
27.
Teller
DY
.
The forced-choice preferential looking procedure: a psychophysical technique for use with human infants
.
Infant Behav Dev
.
1979 Jan
;
2
:
135
53
. .
28.
Richards
JE
.
The development of attention to simple and complex visual stimuli in infants: behavioral and psychophysiological measures
.
Dev Rev
.
2010 Jun
;
30
(
2
):
203
19
. .
29.
Clark
R
,
Blundell
J
,
Dunn
MJ
,
Erichsen
JT
,
Giardini
ME
,
Gottlob
I
, et al.
The potential and value of objective eye tracking in the ophthalmology clinic
.
Eye
.
2019 Aug
;
33
(
8
):
1200
2
. .
30.
Nystagmus UK Eye Research Group (NUKE)
,
Self
JE
,
Dunn
MJ
,
Erichsen
JT
,
Gottlob
I
,
Griffiths
HJ
, et al.
Management of nystagmus in children: a review of the literature and current practice in UK specialist services
.
Eye
.
2020 Jan 9
[cited 2020 Mar 11]. .
31.
Podugolnikova
TA
,
Pushchin
II
.
Normal monocular and binocular visual acuity in seven-year-old children
.
Hum Physiol
.
2018 May
;
44
(
3
):
257
62
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.