Introduction: The aim of the study was to evaluate the refractive status and ocular biometric parameters in subjects with angle closure in Malaysia. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 171 primary angle closure patients (268 eyes). Visual acuity, refraction, and ocular biometry (central anterior chamber depth [ACD], axial length [AL], and lens thickness) were recorded. Vitreous cavity length (VL) and relative lens position (RLP) were calculated. Results: A total of 92 Primary Angle Closure Suspect (PACS), 30 Primary Angle Closure (PAC), and 146 Primary Angle Closure Glaucoma (PACG) eyes were included. Chinese ethnicity formed the majority (n = 197, 73.5%), followed by Malay (n = 57, 21.3%) and Indian (n = 14, 5.2%). There was a significant female preponderance with a female to male ratio of 1.85. Mean age was 65.7 ± 7.7 years. Mean spherical equivalent was +0.33 ± 1.29 D. Approximately half (n = 137, 51%) of the eyes were hyperopic (spherical power ≥+0.5), with PACG having the highest percentage of hyperopia (n = 69, 50.4%). Myopia and emmetropia were present in 48 (17.9) and 83 (31%) eyes, respectively. Although AL and VL in myopia patients were significantly longer than emmetropic and hyperopic eyes (p < 0.001), the ACD was not significantly different (p = 0.427). While the RLP is smaller in myopic eyes, lens thickness was increased in hyperopic eyes. PACG was significantly higher in elderly patients compared to PACS and PAC (p = 0.005). A total of 37 (13.8%) eyes were blind (vision worse than 3/60) and 19 of them (51.3%) were female patients. Conclusion: A decrease in RLP is predictive of angle closure disease in myopic eyes, whereas increased lens thickness contributes to angle closure disease in hyperopic eyes.

1.
Tham
YC
,
Li
X
,
Wong
TY
,
Quigley
HA
,
Aung
T
,
Cheng
CY
.
Global prevalence of glaucoma and projections of glaucoma burden through 2040: a systematic review and meta-analysis
.
Ophthalmology
.
2014 Nov
;
121
(
11
):
2081
90
. .
2.
Quigley
HA
,
Broman
AT
.
The number of people with glaucoma worldwide in 2010 and 2020
.
Br J Ophthalmol
.
2006 Mar 1
;
90
(
3
):
262
7
. .
3.
Chew
FLM
,
Salowi
MA
,
Mustari
Z
,
Husni
MA
,
Hussein
E
,
Adnan
TH
, et al.
Estimates of visual impairment and its causes from the National Eye Survey in Malaysia (NESII)
.
PLoS One
.
2018 Jun 26
;
13
(
6
):
e0198799
.
4.
Lavanya
R
,
Wong
TY
,
Friedman
DS
,
Aung
HT
,
Alfred
T
,
Gao
H
, et al.
Determinants of angle closure in older Singaporeans
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
2008 May 1
;
126
(
5
):
686
91
. .
5.
Razeghinejad
MR
,
Banifatemi
M
.
Ocular biometry in angle closure
.
J Ophthalmic Vis Res
.
2013 Jan
;
8
(
1
):
17
24
..
6.
George
R
,
Paul
PG
,
Baskaran
M
,
Ramesh
SV
,
Raju
P
,
Arvind
H
, et al.
Ocular biometry in occludable angles and angle closure glaucoma: a population-based survey
.
Br J Ophthalmol
.
2003 Apr 1
;
87
(
4
):
399
402
.
7.
Chen
YY
,
Chen
YY
,
Sheu
SJ
,
Chou
P
.
The biometric study in different stages of primary angle-closure glaucoma
.
Eye
.
2013 Sep
;
27
(
9
):
1070
6
. .
8.
Lan
YW
,
Hsieh
JW
,
Hung
PT
.
Ocular biometry in acute and chronic angle-closure glaucoma
.
Ophthalmologica
.
2007
;
221
(
6
):
388
94
. .
9.
Negrel
AD
,
Maul
E
,
Pokharel
GP
,
Zhao
J
,
Ellwein
LB
.
Refractive error study in children: sampling and measurement methods for a multi-country survey
.
Am J Ophthalmol
.
2000 Apr
;
129
(
4
):
421
6
. .
10.
Liu
X
,
Ye
H
,
Zhang
Q
,
Cai
X
,
Yu
W
,
Yu
S
, et al.
Association between myopia, biometry and occludable angle: the Jiangning eye study
.
PLoS One
.
2016 Oct 20
;
11
(
10
):
e0165281
. .
11.
Su
CW
,
Chen
HY
.
Acute angle closure in the setting of high axial myopia: a case report
.
Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep
.
2016
;
1
:
31
3
. .
12.
Chakravarti
T
,
Spaeth
GL
.
The prevalence of myopia in eyes with angle closure
.
J Glaucoma
.
2007 Oct
;
16
(
7
):
642
3
. .
13.
Yong
KL
,
Gong
T
,
Nongpiur
ME
,
How
AC
,
Lee
HK
,
Cheng
L
, et al.
Myopia in asian subjects with primary angle closure: implications for glaucoma trends in East Asia
.
Ophthalmology
.
2014 Aug
;
121
(
8
):
1566
71
. .
14.
Barkana
Y
,
Shihadeh
W
,
Oliveira
C
,
Tello
C
,
Liebmann
JM
,
Ritch
R
.
Angle closure in highly myopic eyes
.
Ophthalmology
.
2006 Feb
;
113
(
2
):
247
54
. .
15.
Department of Statistics Malaysia [Internet]. Available from:
https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php.
16.
Department of Statistics Singapore [Internet]. Population Trends, 2019. 2019. Available from: https://www.singstat.gov.sg/publications/population/population-trends
.
17.
Foster
PJ
,
Buhrmann
R
,
Quigley
HA
,
Johnson
GJ
.
The definition and classification of glaucoma in prevalence surveys
.
Br J Ophthalmol
.
2000
;
86
(
2
):
238
42
.
18.
Pascolini
D
,
Mariotti
SP
.
Global estimates of visual impairment: 2010
.
Br J Ophthalmol
.
2012 May
;
96
(
5
):
614
8
. .
19.
Holden
BA
,
Fricke
TR
,
Wilson
DA
,
Jong
M
,
Naidoo
KS
,
Sankaridurg
P
, et al.
Global prevalence of myopia and high myopia and temporal trends from 2000 through 2050
.
Ophthalmology
.
2016 May
;
123
(
5
):
1036
42
. .
20.
Pan
CW
,
Zheng
YF
,
Anuar
AR
,
Chew
M
,
Gazzard
G
,
Aung
T
, et al.
Prevalence of refractive errors in a multiethnic Asian population: the Singapore epidemiology of eye disease study
.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci
.
2013 Apr 9
;
54
(
4
):
2590
8
. .
21.
Ling
S
,
Ronald
BM
,
Ravikanth
M
,
Lisa
B
,
Catherine
S
,
Neil
R
, et al.
The association of refractive error with glaucoma in a multiethnic population
.
Ophthalmology
.
2016
;
123
(
1
):
92
101
. .
22.
Bonomi
L
,
Marchini
G
,
Marraffa
M
,
Bernardi
P
,
De Franco
I
,
Perfetti
S
, et al.
Epidemiology of angle-closure glaucoma. Prevalence, clinical types, and association with peripheral anterior chamber depth in the Egna-Neumarkt glaucoma study
.
Ophthalmology
.
2000 May
;
107
(
5
):
998
1003
.
23.
Dagi
LR
,
Walton
DS
.
Anterior axial lens subluxation, progressive myopia, and angle-closure glaucoma: recognition and treatment of atypical presentation of ectopia lentis
.
J AAPOS
.
2006
;
10
(
4
):
345
50
. .
24.
Saxena
S
,
Agrawal
PK
,
Pratap
VB
,
Nath
R
,
Saxena
RC
.
The predictive value of the relative lens position in primary angle-closure glaucoma
.
Ann Ophthalmol
.
1993
;
25
(
12
):
453
6
.
25.
Otori
Y
,
Tomita
Y
,
Hamamoto
A
,
Fukui
K
,
Usui
S
,
Tatebayashi
M
.
Relationship between relative lens position and appositional closure in eyes with narrow angles
.
Jpn J Ophthalmol
.
2011
;
55
(
2
):
103
6
. .
26.
Angmo
D
,
Singh
R
,
Chaurasia
S
,
Yadav
S
,
Dada
T
.
Evaluation of anterior segment parameters with two anterior segment optical coherence tomography systems: Visante and Casia, in primary angle closure disease
.
Indian J Ophthalmol
.
2019 Apr
;
67
(
4
):
500
4
. .
27.
Moghimi
S
,
Vahedian
Z
,
Fakhraie
G
,
Ghaffari
R
,
Eslami
Y
,
Jabarvand
M
, et al.
Ocular biometry in the subtypes of angle closure: an anterior segment optical coherence tomography study
.
Am J Ophthalmol
.
2013 Apr
;
155
(
4
):
664
73
.
673.e1
. .
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.