Purpose: To evaluate the agreement between the reading values of the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT), Icare Pro rebound tonometer (IRT) and noncontact tonometer (NCT) in glaucoma patients. Methods: This cross-sectional study comprised 292 eyes of 292 patients selected from a glaucoma outpatient clinic. The intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured sequentially, at a 10-min interval each, in the following order: NCT, IRT and GAT. The central corneal thickness (CCT) was measured using Pentacam HR before the IOP measurements. Results: The mean IOPs measured by the GAT, NCT and IRT were 20.17 ± 6.73 mm Hg (range: 4-48), 19.77 ± 6.88 mm Hg (range: 3-46) and 19.30 ± 5.15 mm Hg (range: 7.30-44.5), respectively. The correlation coefficients of the GAT and IRT, NCT and IRT, and GAT and NCT measurements were r2 = 0.673, r2 = 0.663 and r2 = 0.938 (all p < 0.001), respectively. The IRT tends to overestimate in the low GAT-measured IOPs, whereas it underestimates in high GAT-measured IOPs. The measurements of all 3 devices were also correlated with the CCT at a statistically significant level (GAT: r2 = 0.063, NCT: r2 = 0.063, IRT: r2 = 0.058). Conclusion: The agreement between the IRT and GAT measurements is higher in the IOP range of 9-22 mm Hg, whereas significant discrepancies occur as the IOP deviates from normal values. The variability of the IRT and GAT measurements over a wide range of CCT is minimal.

The AGIS Investigators: The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study (AGIS). 7. The relationship between control of intraocular pressure and visual field deterioration. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;130:429-440.
Iliev ME, Goldblum D, Katsoulis K, Amstutz C, Frueh B: Comparison of rebound tonometry with Goldmann applanation tonometry and correlation with central corneal thickness. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:833-835.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Jimenez-Santos M, Saenz-Frances F, Matilla-Rodero M, Mendez-Hernandez C, Herrero-Vanrell R, Garcia- Feijoo J: Performance of the rebound, noncontact and Goldmann applanation tonometers in routine clinical practice. Acta Ophthalmol 2011;89:676-680.
Cook JA, Botello AP, Elders A, Fathi Ali A, Azuara-Blanco A, Fraser C, McCormack K, Margaret Burr J; Surveillance of Ocular Hypertension Study Group: Systematic review of the agreement of tonometers with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmology 2012;119:1552-1557.
Davies LN, Bartlett H, Mallen EA, Wolffsohn JS: Clinical evaluation of rebound tonometer. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:206-209.
Munkwitz S, Elkarmouty A, Hoffmann EM, Pfeiffer N, Thieme H: Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:875-879.
Kim KN, Jeoung JW, Park KH, Yang MK, Kim DM: Comparison of the new rebound tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in a clinical setting. Acta Ophthalmol 2013;91:e392-e396.
Pakrou N, Gray T, Mills R, Landers J, Craig J: Clinical comparison of the Icare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008;17:43-47.
Recep OF, Hasiripi H, Vayisoglu E, Kalayci D, Sarikatipoglu H: Accurate time interval in repeated tonometry. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1998;76:603-605.
Kass MA: Standardizing the measurement of intraocular pressure for clinical research. Guidelines from the Eye Care Technology Forum. Ophthalmology 1996;103:183-185.
Musch DC, Gillespie BW, Niziol LM, Cashwell LF, Lichter PR; Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study Group: Factors associated with intraocular pressure prior to and during 9 years of treatment in the Collaborative Initial Glaucoma Treatment Study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:927-933.
Kontiola A, Puska P: Measuring intraocular pressure with the Pulsair 3000 and Rebound tonometers in elderly patients without an anesthetic. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2004;242:3-7.
Van der Jagt LH, Jansonius NM: Three portable tonometers, the TGDc-01, the ICare and the Tonopen XL, compared with each other and with Goldmann applanation tonometry. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:429-435.
Rehnman JB, Martin L: Comparison of rebound and applanation tonometry in the management of patients treated for glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2008;28:382-386.
Salim S, Du H, Wan J: Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements and assessment of intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility with the portable ICare rebound tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2013;22:325-329.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Castillo A, Garcia-Sanchez J: Reproducibility and clinical evaluation of rebound tonometry. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005;46:4578-4580.
Fernandes P, Díaz-Rey JA, Queirós A, Gonzalez-Meijome JM, Jorge J: Comparison of the ICare rebound tonometer with the Goldmann tonometer in a normal population. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2005;25:436-440.
Sahin A, Niyaz L, Yildirim N: Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35:335-339.
Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Miani F, Tosoni C, Parisi L, Brusini P: Comparison of iCare tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometry in normal corneas and in eyes with automated lamellar and penetrating keratoplasty. Eye (Lond) 2011;25:642-650.
Chui WS, Lam A, Chen D, Chiu R: The influence of corneal properties on rebound tonometry. Ophthalmology 2008;115:80-84.
Nakamura M, Darhad U, Tatsumi Y, Fujioka M, Kusuhara A, Maeda H, Negi A: Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers. Am J Ophthalmol 2006;142:332-334.
Eysteinsson T, Jonasson F, Sasaki H, Arnarsson A, Sverrisson T, Sasaki K, Stefánsson E; Reykjavik Eye Study Group: Central corneal thickness, radius of the corneal curvature and intraocular pressure in normal subjects using non-contact techniques: Reykjavik Eye Study. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2002;80:11-15.
Recep OF, Hasiripi H, Cağil N, Sarikatipoğlu H: Relation between corneal thickness and intraocular pressure measurement by noncontact and applanation tonometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:1787-1791.
Ko YC, Liu CJ, Hsu WM: Varying effects of corneal thickness on intraocular pressure measurements with different tonometers. Eye (Lond) 2005;19:327-332.
Brusini P, Salvetat ML, Zeppieri M, Tosoni C, Parisi L: Comparison of ICare tonometer with Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients. J Glaucoma 2006;15:213-217.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM, Garcia-Feijoo J, Vico E: Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and Goldmann tonometry. Ophthalmology 2006;113:2156-2162.
Poostchi A, Mitchell R, Nicholas S, Purdie G, Wells A: The iCare rebound tonometer: comparisons with Goldmann tonometry, and influence of central corneal thickness. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2009;37:687-691.
Jóhannesson G, Hallberg P, Eklund A, Lindén C: Pascal, ICare and Goldmann applanation tonometry - a comparative study. Acta Ophthalmol 2008;86:614-621.
Vincent SJ, Vincent RA, Shields D, Lee GA: Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2012;40:e163-e170.
Avitabile T, Longo A, Rocca D, Amato R, Gagliano C, Castaing M: The influence of refractive errors on IOP measurement by rebound tonometry (ICare) and Goldmann applanation. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2010;248:585-591.
Rao A, Kumar M, B P, Varshney G: Relationship of central corneal thickness and intraocular pressure by iCare rebound tonometer. J Glaucoma 2012;23:380-384.
Liu J, Roberts CJ: Influence of corneal biomechanical properties on intraocular pressure measurement: quantitative analysis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:146-155.
Jorge JM, González-Méijome JM, Queirós A, Fernandes P, Parafita MA: Correlations between corneal biomechanical properties measured with the ocular response analyzer and ICare rebound tonometry. J Glaucoma 2008;17:442-448.
Neuburger M, Maier P, Böhringer D, Reinhard T, F Jordan J: The impact of corneal edema on intraocular pressure measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry, Tono-Pen XL, iCare, and ORA: an in vitro model. J Glaucoma 2013;22:584-590.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.