Purpose: To analyze the self-citation rate (SCR) of ophthalmology journals, determine its possible effect on a journal's impact factor (IF) and compare the SCR of subspecialty journals versus general ophthalmology journals. Method: A retrospective consecutive study of ophthalmology journals listed in the Journal Citations Report (JCR) 2013. We retrieved these parameters from each journal's report: IF, total citations, self-citations, SCR and IF without self-citations (corrected IF). Results: A significant correlation was detected between the number of self-citations and publications (R2 = 86.3, p = 0.000). Subspecialty journals had a significantly higher SCR than general journals (p = 0.017). No significant difference was found in terms of IF and corrected IF between general and subspecialty journals (p = 0.260 and p = 0.108, respectively). No significant correlation between IF and SCR was detected (p = 0.099). The corrected IF was inversely correlated with SCR (R2 = -32.6, p = 0.013). An inverse correlation was detected between SCR and IF in the 29 ophthalmology journals with the lowest IF (R2 = -57.3, p = 0.001). Conclusion: Unlike other fields of medicine, the IF of an ophthalmology journal does not correlate with its SCR. Self-citation is found more often in journals with a low corrected IF and is inversely correlated with IF in the bottom half.

Keywords:
Impact factor, Self-citation, Self-citation rate
1.
Garfield E: Citation indexes to science: a new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science 1955;122:108-111.
2.
Garfield E, Sher IH: Genetics Citation Index. Philadelphia, Institute for Scientific Information, July 1963. http://www.garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v7p515y1984.pdf (accessed March 14, 2014).
3.
Thomson Reuters: Journal Citation Reports. http://wokinfo.com/products_tools/analytical/jcr/ (accessed March 14, 2014).
4.
Elliott DB: The impact factor: a useful indicator of journal quality or fatally flawed? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 2014;34:4-7.
5.
Impact Factor: Web of Knowledge. http://wokinfo.com/essays/impact-factor/ (accessed March 14, 2014).
6.
Garfield E: The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA 2006;295:90-93.
7.
Taubes G: Measure for measure in science. Science 1993;260:884-886.
8.
Seglen PO: Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ 1997;314:498-502.
9.
Falagas ME, Kouranos VD, Arencibia-Jorge R, Karageorgopoulos DE: Comparison of SCImago journal rank indicator with journal impact factor. FASEB J 2008;22:2623-2628.
10.
Leydesdorff L: Alternatives to the journal impact factor: I3 and the top-10% (or top-25%?) of the most-highly cited papers. Scientometrics 2012;92:355-365.
11.
Fu LD, Aphinyanaphongs Y, Wang L, Aliferis CF: A comparison of evaluation metrics for biomedical journals, articles, and websites in terms of sensitivity to topic. J Biomed Inform 2011;44:587-594.
12.
Bornmann L, Marx W, Gasparyan AY, Kitas GD: Diversity, value and limitations of the journal impact factor and alternative metrics. Rheumatol Int 2012;32:1861-1867.
13.
Journal self citation: web of knowledge. http://wokinfo.com/essays/journal-self-citation-jcr/ (accessed March 14, 2014).
14.
Science Citation Index, Journal Citation Reports. Philadelphia, Institute for Scientific Information, 1997.
15.
Fassoulaki A, Paraskeva A, Papilas K, Karabinis G: Self-citations in six anaesthesia journals and their significance in determining the impact factor. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:266-269.
16.
Hakkalamani S, Rawal A, Hennessy MS, Parkinson RW: The impact factor of seven orthopaedic journals: factors influencing it. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:159-162.
17.
Karimi Elizee P, Karimzadeh Ghassab R, Raoofi A, Miri SM: The more publication, the higher impact factor: citation analysis of top nine gastroenterology and hepatology journals. Hepat Mon 2012;12:e8467.
18.
Motamed M, Mehta D, Basavaraj S, Fuad F: Self citations and impact factors in otolaryngology journals. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2002;27:318-320.
19.
Sangwal K: Some citation-related characteristics of scientific journals published in individual countries. Scientometrics 2013;97:719-741.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel
2014
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.