Aim: To evaluate very-high-frequency (VHF) ultrasound imaging as a new method to detect and quantify early corneal epithelium changes induced by chronic exposure to a benzalkonium-chloride-containing antiglaucoma drug. Methods: Timolol preserved with 0.01% benzalkonium chloride solution was applied b.i.d. in 1 eye of 10 rabbits for 56 days. Unpreserved timolol solution was used as control. Ocular surface changes were assessed weekly combining clinical examinations, in vivo 60-MHz ultrasound imaging and ex vivo histological analysis. Results: VHF ultrasound imaging allowed quantitative measurement of corneal epithelium thickness and qualitative imaging of toxic epithelial damage. It revealed significantly decreased epithelial thickness in vivo as early as the 21st day of treatment (40.75 ± 1.72 µm at D0 vs. 39 ± 2 at D21, vs. 31.9 ± 2.98 at D56; p = 0.017 and p = 0.005, respectively). The first clinical changes appeared from the 42nd day of treatment (conjunctival redness, conjunctival staining and corneal staining; D56 compared to D0: p = 0.005, 0.01 and 0.004, respectively) and then correlated with VHF ultrasound data. Epithelial thickness measured with VHF ultrasound was correlated with histological epithelial pachymetry (p < 0.001) and with the corneal damage score assessed with scanning electron microscopy (p = 0.038). Conclusion: VHF ultrasound imaging provided an early in vivo diagnosis of corneal epithelium pathology induced by chronic exposure to a preserved glaucoma drug, before the first clinical evidence of ocular toxicity. It could be a new reproducible method to detect the toxicity of glaucoma medication so that therapy can then be adapted.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.