Objective: To evaluate the effects of different biomedical membranes on alkali-burned cornea in vivo. Methods: 12 New Zealand rabbits were chosen and randomly divided into four groups. The right cornea of each rabbit was made into an alkali-burned model with 1 mmol/l NaOH. Poly-D,L-lactic acid (PDLLA), PDLLA modified with collagen (PDLLA/collagen) and PDLLA modified with chitosan (PDLLA/chitosan) membranes were transplanted onto the alkali-burned corneas for evaluation. Clinical evaluations were performed daily with a slit lamp. On the 12th day after surgery, the progress in wound healing was compared by clinical and histological examination. The reepithelialization of each cornea was evaluated with fluorescein staining and 3 corneas of each group were excised to observe histological changes such as corneal wound healing, inflammation and collagen synthesis. Results: The wound healing rate of the PDLLA/chitosan group was higher than in the other groups. A more orderly arrangement of collagen and mild inflammation was observed. The control group had the next best performance, while the PDLLA/collagen and PDLLA alone treatment groups showed the worst results. Conclusion: PDLLA/chitosan promoted wound healing of alkali-burned corneas in vivo and decreased scar tissue formation, while the effect of the PDLLA/collagen and PDLLA membranes was to promote corneal ulcers, which suggests that PDLLA/chitosan membrane transplantation is a potential effective strategy for treatment of alkali-burned cornea.

Keywords:
Poly-D,L-lactic acid, Chitosan, Collagen, Alkali-burned cornea, Wound healing
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2008 S. Karger AG, Basel
2008
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.