Background: Amphotericin B (AmB) and various lipid formulations of AmB are available for the treatment of fungal infections of the eye. Currently, the recommended route of administration for the treatment of fungal keratitis is by topical application. Nevertheless, because of the risk of a difficult to treat exogenous fungal endophthalmitis, a combined topical and systemic treatment is frequently given when treating deep fungal keratitis. To date, little is known about the pure corneal availability of these drugs following systemic treatment. In this study, the corneal concentration following 7 daily doses of parenteral AmB lipid complex (ABLC) or liposomal AmB (L-AmB) was compared to that of AmB deoxycholate (D-AmB) in a rabbit model. Methods: Following induction of uveitis in one rabbit eye by intravitreal injection of endotoxin, daily doses of D-AmB (1 mg/kg), ABLC (5 mg/kg) or L-AmB (5 mg/kg) were given intravenously on 7 consecutive days. Five or more rabbits per treatment were used. AmB concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) in corneas collected at autopsy 24 h after the 7th and final dose. Data were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney U test. Results: After 7 days of treatment, mean corneal concentrations of AmB in the inflamed eyes were significantly higher (2.38 ± 1.47 µg/g; p < 0.01) following treatment with L-AmB compared with ABLC (<0.1 µg/g) and D-AmB (0.46 ± 0.2 µg/g). No AmB could be detected in the corneas of the non-inflamed eyes. Conclusion: In our rabbit model, AmB penetration into the cornea was significantly higher after systemic administration of L-AmB compared with conventional D-AmB or ABLC.

Keywords:
Amphotericin B, Cornea, Keratitis
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.