The knowledge of the multifactorial genesis of the so-called senile cataract has initiated an intensified search for cataract-related risk factors. The mechanisms of syn- and cocataractogenesis could already be shown in the Department of Experimental Ophthalmology, Bonn, in the seventies. Subsequently, cataract epidemiology became a field of interest in 1980 when all available epidemiological data related to cataract research were first collected and reviewed. It has become obvious that the various types of cataract morphology do not represent one unique disease ‘senile cataract’ but reflect different biochemical characteristics. A preliminary study assigned data of case history as well as blood and lens biochemistry to four types of lens opacity. Scheimpflug photography and multilinear microdensitometry were the basis for classifying cataract lenses. After increasing the number of involved patients, the data were analyzed by means of multivariate statistics. The originally used cataract classification system was enlarged to eight types of frequently seen cataract morphologies. A control group was built up to enable case-control studies as well as to obtain characteristics of normal lens density related to age.

Keywords:
Cataract, Epidemiology, Classification, Scheimpflug photography
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
1995
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.