The component oxygen fluxes that constitute a single recording of corneal oxygen uptake when a polarographic oxygen sensor (POS) is placed in contact with the cornea were determined in the in vivo rabbit eye by removing the epithelium and injecting an air bubble into the anterior chamber. The relative contribution of epithelial oxygen consumption, stromal oxygen consumption and diffusion were approximately 55, 5 and 40%, respectively. It is demonstrated that differences in corneal oxygen uptake rates recorded with a POS primarily indicate differences in epithelial metabolic activity. Changes in epithelial metabolism can be determined by measuring both corneal oxygen uptake and corneal thickness. For example, if corneal thickness is constant, differences in epithelial oxygen flux (a) between two eyes of one person, or (b) before and after a procedure in the same eye, can be calculated by multiplying the difference in oxygen consumption measured with a POS by a factor of 1.8.

Keywords:
Polarographic oxygen sensor, Cornea, Epithelium, Oxygen consumption, Rabbit
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1985 S. Karger AG, Basel
1985
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.