Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and quality of life of newly generated monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) in patients diagnosed with idiopathic epiretinal membrane (IEM) following phacovitrectomy. Methods: In this prospective study, 42 patients with IEM and cataract underwent pars plana vitrectomy. They were divided into the ICB00 group (21 patients) and the ZCB00 group (21 patients). Data collected before and after the surgery were compared between the two groups, including uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA), vision-related quality of life (VRQOL), intraocular pressure, contrast sensitivity (CS), and central macular thickness (CMT). Results: The preoperative characteristics of the two groups showed no significant differences. However, at the 6-month follow-up after surgery, there were significant improvements in UDVA (p < 0.001), UIVA (p < 0.001), VRQOL (p < 0.001), CS (p < 0.001), and CMT (p < 0.001) compared to baseline. Notably, the Eyhance ICB00 group showed a significantly higher UCIVA value at 6 months post-surgery when compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 group (p = 0.001), while other parameters did not show significant differences between the groups. Conclusion: The Eyhance IOL significantly improved both intermediate and distance visual acuity, with no notable difference in quality of life or CS compared to the Tecnis ZCB00 IOL after IEM removal. It appears to be a favorable choice for combined cataract and vitreoretinal surgery, offering enhanced vision for daily tasks and a promising alternative to traditional monofocal IOLs.
Journal Section:
Research Article
References
1.
Bellucci
R
. Multifocal intraocular lenses
. Curr Opin Ophthalmol
. 2005
;16
(1
):33
–7
. 2.
Auffarth
GU
, Gerl
M
, Tsai
L
, Janakiraman
DP
, Jackson
B
, Alarcon
A
, et al. Clinical evaluation of a new monofocal IOL with enhanced intermediate function in patients with cataract
. J Cataract Refract Surg
. 2021
;47
(2
):184
–91
. 3.
Calladine
D
, Evans
JR
, Shah
S
, Leyland
M
. Multifocal versus monofocal intraocular lenses after cataract extraction
. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
. 2012
(9
):CD003169
. 4.
Dick
HB
. Accommodative intraocular lenses: current status
. Curr Opin Ophthalmol
. 2005
;16
(1
):8
–26
. 5.
Pedrotti
E
, Bruni
E
, Bonacci
E
, Badalamenti
R
, Mastropasqua
R
, Marchini
G
. Comparative analysis of the clinical outcomes with a monofocal and an extended range of vision intraocular lens
. J Refract Surg
. 2016
;32
(7
):436
–42
. 6.
Escandón-García
S
, Ribeiro
FJ
, McAlinden
C
, Queirós
A
, González-Méijome
JM
. Through-focus vision performance and light disturbances of 3 new intraocular lenses for presbyopia correction
. J Ophthalmol
. 2018
;2018
:6165493
. 7.
Kamath
GG
, Prasad
S
, Danson
A
, Phillips
RP
. Visual outcome with the array multifocal intraocular lens in patients with concurrent eye disease
. J Cataract Refract Surg
. 2000
;26
(4
):576
–81
. 8.
Gayton
JL
, Mackool
RJ
, Ernest
PH
, Seabolt
RA
, Dumont
S
. Implantation of multifocal intraocular lenses using a magnification strategy in cataractous eyes with age-related macular degeneration
. J Cataract Refract Surg
. 2012
;38
(3
):415
–8
. 9.
Tognetto
D
, Cecchini
P
, Giglio
R
, Turco
G
. Surface profiles of new-generation IOLs with improved intermediate vision
. J Cataract Refract Surg
. 2020
;46
(6
):902
–6
. 10.
Cinar
E
, Bolu
H
, Erbakan
G
, Yuce
B
, Aslan
F
, Fece
M
, et al. Vision outcomes with a new monofocal IOL
. Int Ophthalmol
. 2021
;41
(2
):491
–8
. 11.
Mencucci
R
, Cennamo
M
, Venturi
D
, Vignapiano
R
, Favuzza
E
. Visual outcome, optical quality, and patient satisfaction with a new monofocal IOL, enhanced for intermediate vision: preliminary results
. J Cataract Refract Surg
. 2020
;46
(3
):378
–87
. 12.
Unsal
U
, Sabur
H
. Comparison of new monofocal innovative and standard monofocal intraocular lens after phacoemulsification
. Int Ophthalmol
. 2021
;41
(1
):273
–82
. 13.
Garzón
N
, Poyales
F
, Albarrán-Diego
C
, Rico-Del-Viejo
L
, Pérez-Sanz
L
, García-Montero
M
. Visual and optical quality of enhanced intermediate monofocal versus standard monofocal intraocular lens
. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
. 2022
;260
(11
):3617
–25
. 14.
Goslings
O
, Veraart
H
, van de Laar-Muskens
J
, Piñero
DP
. Clinical outcomes with an aspheric monofocal and a new enhanced monofocal intraocular lens with modified optical profile
. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
. 2023
;261
(8
):2315
–26
. 15.
Lopes
D
, Loureiro
T
, Carreira
R
, Rodrigues Barros
S
, Cardoso
JN
, Campos
P
, et al. Comparative evaluation of visual outcomes after bilateral implantation of an advanced or conventional monofocal intraocular lens
. Eur J Ophthalmol
. 2022
;32
(1
):229
–34
. 16.
Govetto
A
, Lalane
RA
3rd, Sarraf
D
, Figueroa
MS
, Hubschman
JP
. Insights into epiretinal membranes: presence of ectopic inner foveal layers and a new optical coherence tomography staging scheme
. Am J Ophthalmol
. 2017
;175
:99
–113
. 17.
Chylack
LTJ
, Wolfe
JK
, Singer
DM
, Leske
MC
, Bullimore
MA
, Bailey
IL
, et al. The lens opacities classification system III. The longitudinal study of cataract study group
. Arch Ophthalmol
. 1993
;111
(6
):831
–6
. 18.
Mangione
CM
, Lee
PP
, Gutierrez
PR
, Spritzer
K
, Berry
S
, Hays
RD
, et al. Development of the 25-item national eye Institute visual function questionnaire
. Arch Ophthalmol
. 2001
;119
(7
):1050
–8
. 19.
Lešin Gaćina
D
, Škegro
B
, Jandroković
S
, Škegro
I
, Bešlić
I
, Bukvić
M
. Psychometric properties of the Croatian version of the 25-item national eye Institute visual function questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25)
. Int Ophthalmol
. 2021
;41
(12
):4025
–36
. 20.
Choi
A
, Kwon
H
, Jeon
S
. Accuracy of theoretical IOL formulas for Panoptix intraocular lens according to axial length
. Sci Rep
. 2021
;11
(1
):7346
. 21.
Bajraktari
G
, Jukić
T
, Vukojevic
N
, Oroz
M
, Bertetić
AR
, Jashari
F
. Evaluation of vision-related quality of life in patients after vitrectomy following idiopathic epiretinal membrane
. Retina
. 2023
;43
(8
):1331
–9
. 22.
Leitritz
MA
, Ziemssen
F
, Voykov
B
, Dimopoulos
S
, Zobor
D
, Bartz-Schmidt
KU
, et al. Early postoperative changes of the foveal surface in epiretinal membranes: comparison of 23-gauge macular surgery with air vs. balanced salt solution
. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
. 2014
;252
(8
):1213
–9
. 23.
Almony
A
, Nudleman
E
, Shah
GK
, Blinder
KJ
, Eliott
DB
, Mittra
RA
, et al. Techniques, rationale, and outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling
. Retina
. 2012
;32
(5
):877
–91
. 24.
Okamoto
F
, Okamoto
Y
, Hiraoka
T
, Oshika
T
. Effect of vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane on visual function and vision-related quality of life
. Am J Ophthalmol
. 2009
;147
(5
):869
–74.e1
. 25.
Jeon
S
, Choi
A
, Kwon
H
. Clinical outcomes after implantation of extended depth-of-focus AcrySof® Vivity® intraocular lens in eyes with low-grade epiretinal membrane
. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol
. 2022
;260
(12
):3883
–8
. 26.
Wan
KH
, Au
ACK
, Kua
WN
, Ng
ALK
, Cheng
GPM
, Lam
NM
, et al. Enhanced monofocal versus conventional monofocal intraocular lens in cataract surgery: a meta-analysis
. J Refract Surg
. 2022
;38
(8
):538
–46
. 27.
Choi
SH
, Lee
HS
, Chang
IB
, Ma
DJ
, Cho
IH
, Lee
SJ
, et al. Evaluation of a new monofocal intraocular lens in patients undergoing cataract and vitrectomy surgery for idiopathic macular hole
. Curr Eye Res
. 2023
;48
(10
):904
–10
. 28.
Nakashizuka
H
, Kitagawa
Y
, Wakatsuki
Y
, Tanaka
K
, Furuya
K
, Hattori
T
, et al. Prospective study of vitrectomy for epiretinal membranes in patients with good best-corrected visual acuity
. BMC Ophthalmol
. 2019
;19
(1
):183
. 29.
Khanna
RK
, Dorvault
M
, Pasco
J
, Cook
AR
, Pichard
T
, Marotte
MT
, et al. Long-term functional outcomes and vision-related quality of life after vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane: a prospective cohort study
. Sci Rep
. 2022
;12
(1
):2470
. © 2024 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2024
You do not currently have access to this content.
