Objective: To compare the anatomic and visual outcomes in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair involving combined pars plana vitrectomy (PPV)/scleral buckle (SB) using a sutureless belt loops technique versus a conventional sutured buckle technique. Methods: This is a retrospective, consecutive, interventional, comparative case series study using patients treated for primary retinal detachment who underwent the SB procedure in combination with PPV. Details regarding anatomic and visual outcome were analyzed. Results: Thirty-five eyes were included in this study: 18 eyes (18 patients) treated with combined PPV and SB performed using a sutureless belt loops technique (group A) and 17 eyes (17 patients) treated with combined PPV and SB sutured to the sclera (group B). Successful anatomic attachment and appropriate buckle height were achieved in all 35 cases. There was 1 case of redetachment in each group during the follow-up: 1/17 (5.9%) in group A and 1/18 (5.6%) in group B (p = 0.97). No cases of buckle infection, extrusion, or intrusion were noted during the follow-up period. Conclusion: SBs installed using a belt loops sutureless technique appear to be as safe and effective as those applied using conventional suturing for repair of retinal detachment, with similar anatomic and functional outcomes.

Keywords:
Retinal detachment repair, Belt loops, Scleral buckle
1.
Brazitikos PD, D’Amico DJ, Tsinopoulos IT, Stangos NT: Primary vitrectomy with per-fluoro-n-octane use in the treatment of pseudophakic retinal detachment with undetected retinal breaks. Retina 1999; 19: 103–109.
2.
Desai UR, Strassman IB: Combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckling for pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachments in which a break is not seen preoperatively. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997; 28: 718–722.
3.
Devenyi RG, de Carvalho Nakamura H: Combined scleral buckle and pars plana vitrectomy as a primary procedure for pseudophakic retinal detachments. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1999; 30: 615–618.
4.
Mehta S, Blinder KJ, Shah GK, Grand MG: Pars plana vitrectomy versus combined pars plana vitrectomy and scleral buckle for primary repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Can J Ophthalmol 2011; 46: 237–241.
5.
SPR Study Group: View 2: the case for primary vitrectomy. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 784–787.
6.
Heimann H, Bartz-Schmidt KU, Bornfeld N, Weiss C, Hilgers RD, Foerster MH; Scler al Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Study Group: Scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective randomized multicenter clinical study. Ophthalmology 2007; 114: 2142–2154.
7.
Alexander P, Ang A, Poulson A, Snead MP: Scleral buckling combined with vitrectomy for the management of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment associated with inferior retinal breaks. Eye (Lond) 2008; 22: 200–203.
8.
Kuchenbecker J, Schmitz K, Behrens Baumann W: Inadvertent scleral perforation in eye muscle versus retinal detachment buckle surgery. Strabismus 2006; 14: 163–166.
9.
La Heij EC, Derhaag PF, Hendrikse F: Results of scleral buckling operations in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Doc Ophthalmol 2000; 100: 17–25.
10.
Zhang Z, Liang X, Sun D, Peng S: The scleral buckling of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment under the surgical microscope. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2011; 42: 96–101.
11.
Lai MM, Ruby AJ, Sarrafizadeh R, Urban KE, Hassan TS, Drenser KA, Garretson BR: Repair of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment using 25-gauge transconjunctival sutureless vitrectomy. Retina 2008; 28: 729–734.
12.
Salicone A, Smiddy WE, Venkatraman A, Feuer W: Visual recovery after scleral buckling procedure for retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2006; 113: 1734–1742.
13.
Yang CH, Lin HY, Huang JS, Ho TC, Lin CP, Chen MS, Yang CM: Visual outcome in primary macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment treated with scleral buckling. J Formos Med Assoc 2004; 103: 212–217.
© 2018 S. Karger AG, Basel
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.