Purpose: To characterise the learning curve of primary retinal detachment (RD) repair for trainee surgeons and monitor the outcomes of surgery for established surgeons. Procedures: Primary RD operations were analysed sequentially using the cumulative sum (CUSUM) and the sequential probability ratio test (SPRT). Results: 359 analysed cases of primary RD were audited with a recurrent RD (ReRD) rate of 14.7%. The individual rate of ReRD ranged from 9.4 to 17.4% (p = 0.74). SPRT and CUSUM analyses showed that ReRD occurred at random when operated by senior surgeons but a learning curve was discernible for junior surgeons. There was a trend for a higher proportion of ReRD caused by untreated breaks in cases operated by junior surgeons (p = 0.75). Conclusion: SPRT and CUSUM are useful methods to monitor surgical outcomes and should be included in audits of sequential operations such as RD. Trainee surgeons experience a quantifiable learning curve.

Keywords:
Retinal detachment, Vitrectomy, Quality management
1.
Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL: United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database Study of Vitreoretinal Surgery: report 1; case mix, complications, and cataract. Eye (Lond) 2013;27:644-651.
2.
Aylward B: Revalidation and retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 2011;226(suppl 1):58-59.
3.
Holt PJ, Poloniecki JD, Thompson MM: How to improve surgical outcomes. BMJ 2008;336:900-901.
4.
Spiegelhalter D, Grigg O, Kinsman R, Treasure T: Risk-adjusted sequential probability ratio tests: applications to Bristol, Shipman and adult cardiac surgery. Int J Qual Health Care 2003;15:7-13.
5.
Rogers CA, Ganesh JS, Banner NR, Bonser RS; Steering Group: Cumulative risk adjusted monitoring of 30-day mortality after cardiothoracic transplantation: UK experience. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2005;27:1022-1029.
6.
Sebille V, Bellissant E: Comparison of four sequential methods allowing for early stopping of comparative clinical trials. Clin Sci (Lond) 2000;98:569-578.
7.
Waller HM, Connor SJ: Cumulative sum (Cusum) analysis provides an objective measure of competency during training in endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP). HPB (Oxford) 2009;11:565-569.
8.
Jackson TL, Donachie PH, Sallam A, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL: United Kingdom National Ophthalmology Database study of vitreoretinal surgery: report 3, retinal detachment. Ophthalmology 2014;121:643-648.
9.
Dugas B, Lafontaine PO, Guillaubey A, Berrod JP, Hubert I, Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher CP: The learning curve for primary vitrectomy without scleral buckling for pseudophakic retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:319-324.
10.
Adelman RA, Parnes AJ, Michalewska Z, Ducournau D; European Vitreo-Retinal Society (EVRS) Retinal Detachment Study Group: Clinical variables associated with failure of retinal detachment repair: the European vitreo-retinal society retinal detachment study report number 4. Ophthalmology 2014;121:1715-1719.
11.
Ehrlich R, Ahmad N, Welch S, Hadden P, Polkinghorne P: Vitreoretinal fellow surgical outcome of small gauge pars plana vitrectomy for acute rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1147-1152.
12.
Sagong M, Chang W: Learning curve of the scleral buckling operation: lessons from the first 97 cases. Ophthalmologica 2010;224:22-29.
13.
Mazinani BA, Rajendram A, Walter P, Roessler GF: Does surgical experience have an effect on the success of retinal detachment surgery? Retina 2012;32:32-37.
© 2016 S. Karger AG, Basel
2016
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.