Purpose: To analyze the correlation between morphological and functional results 12 months after epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. Methods: 31 eyes from 31 consecutive patients with metamorphopsia and best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) below 20/32 underwent a transconjunctival 23- gauge vitrectomy with ERM and internal limiting membrane peeling. Preoperatively and 3, 6 and 12 months postoperatively, we assessed BCVA, microperimetry (MP-1) and spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT). Photoreceptor inner and outer segment (IS/OS) was graded on SD-OCT images and correlated with microperimetry measurements in the fovea and parafoveal region. Results: The postoperative BCVA was significantly better in eyes with an intact IS/OS junction (p < 0.01). In addition, the mean defect depth was postoperatively decreased in the foveal and parafoveal area in eyes with an intact IS/OS junction. A correlation of SD-OCT IS/OS images and microperimetry in eyes with improvement in BCVA of at least 2 lines revealed a statistically significant result for the parafoveal quadrants (p < 0.011 for SD-OCT and p < 0.005 for microperimetry) but not for the foveal area alone. Conclusions: The IS/OS regeneration in the parafoveal quadrants contributes significantly to the recovery of BCVA following ERM surgery. Consequently, functional and morphological tests of the macular area should not be limited to the fovea but should be extended to the parafoveal region.

Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, Scheler R, Schumann R, Zhao F, Kampik A: Residual cellular proliferation on the internal limiting membrane in macular pucker surgery. Retina 2012;32:477-485.
Niwa T, Terasaki H, Kondo M, Piao CH, Suzuki T, Miyake Y: Function and morphology of macula before and after removal of idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1652-1656.
McCarty DJ, Mukesh BN, Chikani V, Wang JJ, Mitchell P, Taylor HR, McCarty CA: Prevalence and associations of epiretinal membranes in the visual impairment project. Am J Ophthalmol 2005;140:288-294.
Michalewski J, Michalewska Z, Cisiecki S, Nawrocki J: Morphologically functional correlations of macular pathology connected with epiretinal membrane formation in spectral optical coherence tomography (SOCT). Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2007;245:1623-1631.
Haritoglou C, Schumann RG, Kampik A, Gandorfer A: Heavy brilliant blue G for internal limiting membrane staining. Retina 2011;31:405-407.
Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y, Kaneko T, Yamane S, Kobayashi S, Arakawa A, Kadonosono K: Inner segment/outer segment junction assessed by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in patients with idiopathic epiretinal membrane. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;150:834-839.
Oster SF, Mojana F, Brar M, Yuson RM, Cheng L, Freeman WR: Disruption of the photoreceptor inner segment/outer segment layer on spectral domain-optical coherence tomography is a predictor of poor visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membranes. Retina 2010;30:713-718.
Spaide RF, Curcio CA: Anatomical correlates to the bands seen in the outer retina by optical coherence tomography: literature review and model. Retina 2011;31:1609-1619.
Watanabe A, Arimoto S, Nishi O: Correlation between metamorphopsia and epiretinal membrane optical coherence tomography findings. Ophthalmology 2009;116:1788-1793.
Falkner-Radler CI, Glittenberg C, Hagen S, Benesch T, Binder S: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography for monitoring epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology 2010;117:798-805.
Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, Matsuki T, Ito S, Ishida K, Kurimoto Y: The significance of cone outer segment tips as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:698-704, 704.e1.
Itoh Y, Inoue M, Rii T, Hiraoka T, Hirakata A: Significant correlation between visual acuity and recovery of foveal cone microstructures after macular hole surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:111-119.e1.
Inoue M, Arakawa A, Yamane S, Watanabe Y, Kadonosono K: Long-term outcome of macular microstructure assessed by optical coherence tomography in eyes with spontaneous resolution of macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 2012;153:687-691.
Theodossiadis PG, Theodossiadis GP, Charonis A, Emfietzoglou I, Grigoropoulos VG, Liarakos VS: The photoreceptor layer as a prognostic factor for visual acuity in the secondary epiretinal membrane after retinal detachment surgery: imaging analysis by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Am J Ophthalmol 2011;151:973-980.
Shimozono M, Oishi A, Hata M, Kurimoto Y: Restoration of the photoreceptor outer segment and visual outcomes after macular hole closure: spectral-domain optical coherence tomography analysis. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1469-1476.
Inoue M, Morita S, Watanabe Y, Kaneko T, Yamane S, Kobayashi S, Arakawa A, Kadonosono K: Preoperative inner segment/outer segment junction in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography as a prognostic factor in epiretinal membrane surgery. Retina 2011;31:1366-1372.
Mitamura Y, Hirano K, Baba T, Yamamoto S: Correlation of visual recovery with presence of photoreceptor inner/outer segment junction in optical coherence images after epiretinal membrane surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:171-175.
Sandali O, Basli E, Borderie V, Laroche L, Monin C: Recurrence of an idiopathic vasocentric epiretinal membrane: Clinical and surgical particularities. J Fr Ophtalmol 2012;35:48. e1-e5.
Yagi T, Sakata K, Funatsu H, Noma H, Yamamoto K, Hori S: Macular microcirculation in patients with epiretinal membrane before and after surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:931-934.
Zhou J, Liu W, Li Q, Li X, Hao J, Wang XL: A comparative study of macular thickness and function before and after idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane surgery. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2012;48:119-123.
Kampik A: Clinical and pathological aspects of epiretinal membrane formation. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 1982;181:386-387.
Kampik A: Pathology of epiretinal membrane, idiopathic macular hole, and vitreomacular traction syndrome. Retina 2012;32(suppl 2):S194-S198.
Pesin SR, Olk RJ, Grand MG, Boniuk I, Arribas NP, Thomas MA, Williams DF, Burgess D: Vitrectomy for premacular fibroplasia. Prognostic factors, long-term follow-up, and time course of visual improvement. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1109-1114.
Shiono A, Kogo J, Klose G, Takeda H, Ueno H, Tokuda N, Inoue J, Matsuzawa A, Kayama N, Ueno S, Takagi H: Photoreceptor outer segment length: a prognostic factor for idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery. Ophthalmology 2013, E-pub ahead of print.
Suh MH, Seo JM, Park KH, Yu HG: Associations between macular findings by optical coherence tomography and visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane removal. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:473-480 e473.
Rohrschneider K, Bultmann S, Springer C: Use of fundus perimetry (microperimetry) to quantify macular sensitivity. Prog Retin Eye Res 2008;27:536-548.
Karacorlu M, Ozdemir H, Senturk F, Karacorlu SA, Uysal O: Correlation of retinal sensitivity with visual acuity and macular thickness in eyes with idiopathic epimacular membrane. Int Ophthalmol 2010;30:285-290.
Arichika S, Hangai M, Yoshimura N: Correlation between thickening of the inner and outer retina and visual acuity in patients with epiretinal membrane. Retina 2010;30:503-508.
Odrobina D, Michalewska Z, Michalewski J, Dziegielewski K, Nawrocki J: Long-term evaluation of vitreomacular traction disorder in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography. Retina 2011;31:324-331.
Haritoglou C, Neubauer AS, Reiniger IW, Priglinger SG, Gass CA, Kampik A: Long-term functional outcome of macular hole surgery correlated to optical coherence tomography measurements. Clin Experiment Ophthalmol 2007;35:208-213.
Wakabayashi T, Fujiwara M, Sakaguchi H, Kusaka S, Oshima Y: Foveal microstructure and visual acuity in surgically closed macular holes: spectral-domain optical coherence tomographic analysis. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1815-1824.
Koo HC, Rhim WI, Lee EK: Morphologic and functional association of retinal layers beneath the epiretinal membrane with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography in eyes without photoreceptor abnormality. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2012;250:491-498.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.