Background/Aims: To investigate the morphological changes of the inner retinal layer by spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (OCT) after idiopathic full-thickness macular hole (MH) surgery. Methods: In a retrospective study, the authors evaluated 52 eyes of 49 patients with MH closed following vitrectomy. All patients were followed postoperatively for more than 6 months. Cross-sectional and retinal surface images were obtained using Cirrus high-definition OCT before and after surgery. In 24 of the 52 eyes, fundus autofluorescence (FAF) was analyzed. Results: The incidence of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer (DONFL) increased gradually over time after surgery. 57.7% had defects of only the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and 30.8% had defects in the inner plexiform layer at 6 months after surgery. Postoperative best-corrected visual acuity did not differ significantly based on the depth of the DONFL (p = 0.299). There were no changes in FAF in the area with DONFL. Conclusions: DONFL is characterized by progressive defects that are not limited to RNFL thickness. The healing process after vitrectomy for MH is not limited in the RNFL affecting deeper structural changes. Further investigations are required to evaluate the pathophysiological mechanism of inner retinal change after MH surgery.

Keywords:
Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer, Inner retinal layer, Macular hole, Vitrectomy
1.
Kelly NE, Wendel RT: Vitreous surgery for idiopathic macular holes. Results of a pilot study. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:654-659.
2.
Haritoglou C, Gass CA, Schaumberger M, Gandorfer A, Ulbig MW, Kampik A: Long-term follow-up after macular hole surgery with internal limiting membrane peeling. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;134:661-666.
3.
Haritoglou C, Reiniger IW, Schaumberger M, Gass CA, Priglinger SG, Kampik A: Five-year follow-up of macular hole surgery with peeling of the internal limiting membrane: update of a prospective study. Retina 2006;26:618-622.
4.
Christensen UC, Krøyer K, Sander B, Jorgensen TM, Larsen M, la Cour M: Macular morphology and visual acuity after macular hole surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling. Br J Ophthalmol 2010;94:41-47.
5.
Almony A, Nudleman E, Shah GK, Blinder KJ, Eliott DB, Mittra RA, Tewari A: Techniques, rationale, and outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling. Retina 2012;32:877-891.
6.
Brooks HL Jr: Macular hole surgery with and without internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1939-1948.
7.
Bainbridge J, Herbert E, Gregor Z: Macular holes: vitreoretinal relationships and surgical approaches. Eye (Lond) 2008;22:1301-1309.
8.
Christensen UC: Value of internal limiting membrane peeling in surgery for idiopathic macular hole and the correlation between function and retinal morphology. Acta Ophthalmol 2009;87:1-23.
9.
Kumagai K, Furukawa M, Ogino N, Larson E: Incidence and factors related to macular hole reopening. Am J Ophthalmol 2010;149:127-132.
10.
Tadayoni R, Paques M, Massin P, Mouki-Benani S, Mikol J, Gaudric A: Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance of the fundus after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal. Ophthalmology 2001;108:2279-2283.
11.
Ito Y, Terasaki H, Takahashi A, Yamakoshi T, Kondo M, Nakamura M: Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1415-1420.
12.
Terasaki H, Miyake Y, Nomura R, Piao CH, Hori K, Niwa T, Kondo M: Focal macular ERGs in eyes after removal of macular ILM during macular hole surgery. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:229-234.
13.
Imai H, Ohta K: Microperimetric determination of retinal sensitivity in areas of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer following internal limiting membrane peeling. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010;54:435-440.
14.
Mitamura Y, Ohtsuka K: Relationship of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance to internal limiting membrane peeling. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1766-1770.
15.
Keane PA, Mand PS, Liakopoulos S, Walsh AC, Sadda SR: Accuracy of retinal thickness measurements obtained with Cirrus optical coherence tomography. Br J Ophthalmol 2009;93:1461-1467.
16.
Kiernan DF, Hariprasad SM, Chin EK, Kiernan CL, Rago J, Mieler WF: Prospective comparison of Cirrus and Stratus optical coherence tomography for quantifying retinal thickness. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:267-275.
17.
Gass JD: Reappraisal of biomicroscopic classification of stages of development of a macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:752-759.
18.
Lee JW, Kim IT: Outcomes of idiopathic macular epiretinal membrane removal with and without internal limiting membrane peeling: a comparative study. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2010;54:129-134.
19.
Alkabes M, Salinas C, Vitale L, Burés-Jelstrup A, Nucci P, Mateo C: En face optical coherence tomography of inner retinal defects after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular hole. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011;52:8349-8355.
20.
Mitamura Y, Suzuki T, Kinoshita T, Miyano N, Tashimo A, Ohtsuka K: Optical coherence tomographic findings of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance. Am J Ophthalmol 2004;137:1155-1156.
21.
Kishimoto H, Kusuhara S, Matsumiya W, Nagai T, Negi A: Retinal surface imaging provided by Cirrus high-definition optical coherence tomography prominently visualizes a dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after macular hole surgery. Int Ophthalmol 2011;31:385-392.
22.
Gandorfer A, Haritoglou C, Gass CA, Ulbig MW, Kampik A: Indocyanine green-assisted peeling of the internal limiting membrane may cause retinal damage. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:431-433.
23.
Foos RY: Vitreoretinal juncture: topographical variations. Invest Ophthalmol 1972;11:801-808.
24.
Mester V, Kuhn F: Internal limiting membrane removal in the management of full-thickness macular hole. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:769-777.
25.
Mittleman D, Green WR, Michels RG, de la Cruz Z: Clinicopathologic correlation of an eye after surgical removal of an epiretinal membrane. Retina 1989;9:143-147.
26.
Bringmann A, Pannicke T, Grosche J, Francke M, Wiedemann P, Skatchkov SN, Osborne NN, Reichenbach A: Müller cells in the healthy and diseased retina. Prog Retin Eye Res 2006;25:397-424.
27.
Nakamura T, Murata T, Hisatomi T, Enaida H, Sassa Y, Ueno A, Sakamoto T, Ishibashi T: Ultrastructure of the vitreoretinal interface following the removal of the internal limiting membrane using indocyanine green. Curr Eye Res 2003;27:395-399.
28.
Yamda E: Some structural features of the fovea centralis in the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol 1969;82:151-159.
29.
Gass JD: Müller cell cone, an overlooked part of the anatomy of the fovea centralis: hypotheses concerning its role in the pathogenesis of macular hole and foveomacular retinoschisis. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:821-823.
30.
Holländer H, Makarov F, Dreher Z, van Driel D, Chan-Ling TL, Stone J: Structure of the macroglia of the retina: sharing and division of labour between astrocytes and Müller cells. J Comp Neurol 1991;313:587-603.
31.
Stefánsson E: Physiology of vitreous surgery. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2009;247:147-163.
© 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel
2013
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.