Background: This study was undertaken to examine the possible effect of microcannula-guided entry sites on the rate of intraoperative retinal break formation. Methods: In this historical cohort study, all patients having undergone vitrectomy with epiretinal or internal limiting membrane peeling performed by one surgeon between January 2005 and March 2009 were included. All procedures with microcannula-guided entry sites (23- and 25-gauge vitrectomy) were compared to procedures without the use of microcannulas (20-gauge vitrectomy). Results: A total of 221 eyes with a follow-up of at least 30 days were analyzed. The total incidence of intraoperative retinal break formation was 25.2% (n = 28/111) for the 20-gauge group and 12.7% (n = 14/110) for the 23-/25-gauge group, resulting in an odds ratio of 2.313 (95% confidence interval 1.142–4.685) of an increased rate in the 20-gauge group. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that intraoperative retinal breaks during vitrectomy are reduced in the microcannula-guided techniques compared to 20-gauge vitrectomy. This effect may be attributed to the protection of the vitreous base during surgery. Further prospective studies are warranted.

1.
Singh A, Stewart JM: 25-Gauge sutureless vitrectomy. Variations in incision architecture. Retina 2009;29:451–455.
2.
Nagpal M, Wartikar S, Nagpal K: Comparison of clinical outcomes and wound dynamics of sclerotomy ports of 20, 25, and 23 gauge vitrectomy. Retina 2009;29:225–231.
3.
Scartozzi R, Bessa AS, Gupta OP, Regillo CD: Intraoperative sclerotomy-related retinal breaks for macular surgery, 20- vs 25-gauge vitrectomy systems. Am J Ophthalmol 2007;143:155–156.
4.
Territo C, Glieser JP, Wilson CA, Anand R: Influence of the cannulated vitrectomy-system on the occurrence of iatrogenic sclerotomy retinal tears. Retina 1997;17:430–433.
5.
Nakano T, Uemura A, Sakamoto T: Incidence of iatrogenic peripheral retinal breaks in 23-gauge vitrectomy for macular diseases. Retina 2011;31:1997–2001.
6.
Sandali O, Sanharawi ME, Lecuen N, Barale PO, Bonnel S, Basli E, Borderie V, Laroche L, Monin C: 25-, 23-, and 20-gauge vitrectomy in epiretinal membrane surgery: a comparative study of 553 cases. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2011;249:1811–1819.
7.
Covert DJ, Henry CR, Bhatia SK, Croskrey J, Sanchez CR, Han DP: Intraoperative retinal tear formation and postoperative rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in transconjunctival cannulated vitrectomy systems compared with the standard 20-gauge system. Arch Ophthalmol 2012;130:186–189.
8.
Chung SE, Kim KH, Kang SW: Retinal breaks associated with the induction of posterior vitreous detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;147:1012–1016.
9.
Tan HS, Mura M, De Smet MD: Iatrogenic retinal breaks in 25-gauge macular surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2009;148:427–430.
10.
Sjaarda RN, Glaser BM, Thompson JT, Murphy RP, Hanham A: Distribution of iatrogenic retinal breaks in macular hole surgery. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1387–1392.
11.
Al-Harthi E, Abboud EB, Al-Dhibi H, Dhindsa H: Incidence of sclerotomy-related retinal breaks. Retina 2005;25:281–284.
12.
Ramkissoon YD, Aslam SA, Shah SP, Wong SC, Sullivan PM: Risk of iatrogenic peripheral retinal breaks in 20-G pars plana vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1825–1830.
13.
Machemer R, Hickingbotham D: The three-port microcannular system for closed vitrectomy. Am J Ophthalmol 1985;100:590–592.
14.
Klöti R: Vitrektomie. 2. Chirurgische Technik mit dem Vitreous-Stripper. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1973;187:161–170.
15.
Faulborn J, Conway BP, Machemer R: Surgical complications of pars plana vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology 1978;85:116–125.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.