Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare diurnal and nocturnal intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuations before and after trabeculectomy, and to evaluate the potential of trabeculectomy to even out IOP peaks. Materials and Methods: Retrospectively, 35 diurnal and nocturnal IOP curves of patients (35 eyes) who underwent trabeculectomy were analyzed. Diurnal and nocturnal IOP profiles were recorded from 06:00 to 23:59 and 00:00 to 06:00, respectively. Follow-up was at least 300 days. Two criteria for success were defined: (1) IOP ≤21 mm Hg and at least a 20% IOP reduction from baseline; (2) <18 mm Hg without medication. Results: The preoperative maximum diurnal and nocturnal IOP (IOPmax) were 26.5 ± 5.9 and 23.4 ± 5.2 mm Hg, respectively. The postoperative diurnal and nocturnal IOPmax were 16 ± 4.4 and 16 ± 5.4 mm Hg, respectively. Pre- to postoperative IOP reductions were statistically different (day 40% and night 32%; p < 0.001). Diurnal fluctuation was reduced significantly from 12.1 ± 4.2 mm Hg preoperatively to 5.6 ± 2.2 mm Hg postoperatively (reduction of 54%), and nocturnal fluctuation from 7.1 ± 4.5 to 3.9 ± 4.1 mm Hg (reduction of 46%, statistically insignificant due to large SD), respectively. Success criteria 1 and 2 were achieved in 71 and 54% of patients at daytime and in 63 and 57% at nighttime (no statistically significant difference detectable). Follow-up was 2.1 ± 1.7 years. Conclusions: Trabeculectomy achieves a leveling of IOPmax in the diurnal-nocturnal comparison. The preoperative fluctuations could be nearly bisected. Relating to the success criteria, the statistical analysis did not reveal a difference in the diurnal-nocturnal comparison.

Keywords:
Intraocular pressure, Fluctuations, Trabeculectomy
1.
Liu JH, Sit AJ, Weinreb RN: Variation of 24 h intraocular pressure in healthy individuals: right eye versus left eye. Ophthalmology 2005;112:1670–1675.
2.
David R, Zangwill L, Briscoe D, Dagan M, Yagev R, Yassur Y: Diurnal intraocular pressure variations: an analysis of 690 diurnal curves. Br J Ophthalmol 1992;76:280–283.
3.
Liu JH, Zhang X, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN: Twenty-four-hour intraocular pressure pattern associated with early glaucomatous changes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:1586–1590.
4.
Liu JH, Bouligny RP, Kripke DF, Weinreb RN: Nocturnal elevation of intraocular pressure is detectable in the sitting position. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2003;44:4439–4442.
5.
Zeimer RC, Wilensky JT, Gieser DK, Viana MA: Association between intraocular pressure peaks and progression of visual field loss. Ophthalmology 1991;98:64–69.
6.
Asrani S, Zeimer R, Wilensky J, Gieser D, Vitale S, Lindenmuth K: Large diurnal fluctuations in intraocular pressure are an independent risk factor in patients with glaucoma. J Glaucoma 2000;9:134–142.
7.
Lee BL, Zangwill L, Weinreb RN: Change in optic disc topography associated with diurnal variation in intraocular pressure. J Glaucoma 1999;8:221–223.
8.
Hughes E, Spry P, Diamond J: 24 h monitoring of intraocular pressure in glaucoma management: a retrospective review. J Glaucoma 2003;12:232–236.
9.
Konstas AG, Topouzis F, Leliopoulou O, Pappas T, Georgiadis N, Jenkins JN, Stewart WC: 24 h intraocular pressure control with maximum medical therapy compared with surgery in patients with advanced open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2006;113:761–765, e761.
10.
Guzey M, Arslan O, Tamcelik N, Satici A: Effects of frequency-doubled Nd:YAG laser trabeculoplasty on diurnal intraocular pressure variations in primary open-angle glaucoma. Ophthalmologica 1999;213:214–218.
11.
Lee AC, Mosaed S, Weinreb RN, Kripke DF, Liu JH: Effect of laser trabeculoplasty on nocturnal intraocular pressure in medically treated glaucoma patients. Ophthalmology 2007;114:666–670.
12.
Mansouri K, Orguel S, Mermoud A, Haefliger I, Flammer J, Ravinet E, Shaarawy T: Quality of diurnal intraocular pressure control in primary open-angle patients treated with latanoprost compared with surgically treated glaucoma patients: a prospective trial. Br J Ophthalmol 2008;92:332–336.
13.
Klink T, Schrey S, Elsesser U, Klink J, Schlunck G, Grehn F: Interobserver variability of the Wurzburg bleb classification score. Ophthalmologica 2008;222:408–413.
14.
Wilensky JT, Zeimer RC, Gieser DK, Kaplan BH: The effects of glaucoma filtering surgery on the variability of diurnal intraocular pressure. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1994;92:377–381; discussion 381–373.
15.
Greenidge KC, Spaeth GL, Fiol-Silva Z: Effect of argon laser trabeculoplasty on the glaucomatous diurnal curve. Ophthalmology 1983;90:800–804.
16.
Caprioli J, Coleman AL: Intraocular pressure fluctuation a risk factor for visual field progression at low intraocular pressures in the advanced glaucoma intervention study. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1123–1129.e1123.
17.
Hong YJ, Choe CM, Lee YG, Chung HS, Kim HK: The effect of mitomycin-C on postoperative corneal astigmatism in trabeculectomy and a triple procedure. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1998;29:484–489.
18.
Saiz A, Maquet JA, Pinon R: Reduced variation of the diurnal curve after the subscleral scheie procedure for primary open-angle glaucoma. Ann Ophthalmol 1993;25:16–19.
19.
Realini T, Weinreb RN, Wisniewski S: Short-term repeatability of diurnal intraocular pressure patterns in glaucomatous individuals. Ophthalmology 2011;118:47–51.
20.
Realini T, Weinreb RN, Wisniewski SR: Diurnal intraocular pressure patterns are not repeatable in the short term in healthy individuals. Ophthalmology 2010;117:1700–1704.
© 2011 S. Karger AG, Basel
2011
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.