Aims: To evaluate straylight and contrast sensitivity in cataractous eyes of different morphologies, and to determine which type of cataract presents higher impairment of visual function, specifically compared to studies proposing new norms for European drivers. Methods: Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), contrast sensitivity and straylight were measured in 97 cataractous eyes using respectively a Snellen chart, a Pelli-Robson chart and the compensation comparison method (C-Quant Straylight Meter). Cataracts were graded using the Lens Opacities Classification System III (LOCS III) and divided into 4 groups: nuclear, cortical, nuclear-cortical and posterior subcapsular cataract. These results were compared to data from 38 cataract-free control subjects. Results: Contrast sensitivity was reduced and straylight increased in all cataract patients, most notably in posterior subcapsular and nuclear-cortical cataract. Contrast sensitivity and BCVA were correlated (r = 0.44), whereas straylight and BCVA were not. Applying cut-off values as proposed by European drivers studies of 1.25 log contrast sensitivity and 1.4 log straylight as safe margins for driving, 31% would be considered unfit to drive on the basis of contrast sensitivity and 78% on the basis of straylight, although their visual acuity was still above the current European visual acuity requirement for driving. Conclusions: Straylight and, to a lesser extent, contrast sensitivity are complementary to BCVA and should be taken into account when considering surgery or driving legality.

Keywords:
Straylight, Contrast sensitivity, Cataract, Lens Opacities Classification System III, Fitness to drive
1.
Elliott DB, Hurst MA, Weatherill J: Comparing clinical tests of visual function in cataract with the patient’s perceived visual disability. Eye 1990;4:712–717.
2.
Rubin GS, Adamsons IA, Stark WJ: Comparison of acuity, contrast sensitivity, and disability glare before and after cataract surgery. Arch Ophthalmol. 1993;111:56–61.
3.
Brown NA: The morphology of cataract and visual performance. Eye 1993;7:63–67.
4.
Elliott DB: Evaluating visual function in cataract. Optom Vis Sci 1993;70:896–902.
5.
Elliott DB, Hurst MA: Simple clinical techniques to evaluate visual function in patients with early cataract. Optom Vis Sci 1990;67:822–825.
6.
De Waard PW, IJspeert JK, van den Berg TJ, de Jong PT: Intraocular light scattering in age-related cataracts. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:618–625.
7.
Franssen L, Coppens JE, van den Berg TJ: Compensation comparison method for assessment of retinal straylight. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006;47:768–776.
8.
Coppens JE, Franssen L, van den Berg TJ: Reliability of the compensation comparison method for measuring retinal stray light studied using Monte-Carlo simulations. J Biomed Opt 2006;11:054010.
9.
Coppens JE, Franssen L, van Rijn LJ, van den Berg TJ: Reliability of the compensation comparison stray-light measurement method. J Biomed Opt 2006;11:34027.
10.
Owsley C, Stalvey BT, Wells J, Sloane ME, McGwin G Jr: Visual risk factors for crash involvement in older drivers with cataract. Arch Ophthalmol 2001;119:881–887.
11.
Van Rijn LJ, Nischler C, Michael R, Heine C, Coeckelbergh T, Wilhelm H, Grabner G, Barraquer RI, van den Berg TJ: Prevalence of impairment of visual function in European drivers. Acta Ophthalmol 2009, E-pub ahead of print.
12.
Michael R, van Rijn LJ, van den Berg TJ, Barraquer RI, Grabner G, Wilhelm H, Coeckelbergh T, Emesz M, Marvan P, Nischler C: Association of lens opacities, intraocular straylight, contrast sensitivity and visual acuity in European drivers. Acta Ophthalmol 2009;87:666–671.
13.
Chylack LT Jr, Wolfe JK, Singer DM, Leske MC, Bullimore MA, Bailey IL, Friend J, McCarthy D, Wu SY: The Lens Opacities Classification System III. The Longitudinal Study of Cataract Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:831–836.
14.
Pelli DG, Robson JG, Wilkins AJ: The design of a new chart for measuring contrast sensitivity. Clin Vis Sci 1988;2:187–199.
15.
Elliott DB, Sanderson K, Conkey A: The reliability of the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity chart. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1990;10:21–24.
16.
Mäntyjärvi M, Laitinen T: Normal values for the Pelli-Robson contrast sensitivity test. J Cataract Refract Surg 2001;27:261–266.
17.
Elliott DB, Gilchrist J, Whitaker D: Contrast sensitivity and glare sensitivity changes with three types of cataract morphology: are these techniques necessary in a clinical evaluation of cataract? Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 1989;9:25–30.
18.
Adamsons I, Rubin GS, Vitale S, Taylor HR, Stark WJ: The effect of early cataracts on glare and contrast sensitivity: a pilot study Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1081–1086.
19.
Lasa MS, Podgor MJ, Datiles MB, Caruso RC, Magno BV: Glare sensitivity in early cataracts. Br J Ophthalmol 1993;77:489–491.
20.
Rozema JJ, Van den Berg TJTP, Tassignon MJ: Retinal straylight as a function of age and ocular biometry in healthy eyes. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51:2795–2799.
21.
Adamsons I, Munoz B, Enger C, Taylor HR: Prevalence of lens opacities in surgical and general populations. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:993–997.
22.
Panchapakesan J, Mitchell P, Tumuluri K, Rochtchina E, Foran S, Cumming RG: Five year incidence of cataract surgery: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003;87:168–172.
23.
Klein BEK, Klein R, Moss SE: Incident cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 1997;104:573–580.
© 2010 S. Karger AG, Basel
2010
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.