Purpose: Our aim was to evaluate the incidence, risk factors, pathogens, use of systemic and intravitreal antibiotics, and outcome of traumatic endophthalmitis after open globe injury with retained intraocular foreign body (RIOFB). Methods: Patients with open globe injury and RIOFB complicated by endophthalmitis were enrolled and retrospectively studied in Taiwan over a 20-year-period from 1981 to 2002. Results: There were 125 patients, who sustained open globe injury and RIOFB, which required surgical management. In 15 patients (12%) traumatic endophthalmitis was identified. Thirteen (87%) of these 15 cases had signs of endophthalmitis at their initial presentation. The patients’ mean age was 41 years; all of them were male. Invading micro-organisms were isolated in 8 patients, and the positive culture rate was 53%. Gram-negative bacteria were the most commonly isolated organisms in 6 patients and 1 eye with multiple organisms. One eye with culture-proven Bacillus cereus had a very fulminant course and ended with phthisis bulbi. All 15 patients received topical and systemic intravenous antibiotic treatment; 9 eyes (60%) were given intravitreal antibiotic injection with broad-spectrum combined vancomycin and ceftazidime in 5 eyes. Pars plana vitrectomy was performed in 9 patients, with successful removal of RIOFB. The final visual acuity improved in 8 patients (53.5%), was unchanged in 1 (6.7%) and worse in 6 (40.0%). Five patients (33%) got a visual outcome of 6/60 or better. There were also 5 patients (33%) with a poor outcome of no light perception. Eleven (73%) of 15 patients had treatment delayed for >24 h after injury, and 5 out of these 11 patients had a very poor visual outcome (1 hand motion, 4 no light perception). Delay of presentation for >24 h after injury was associated with a tendency to increased risk of endophthalmitis [11/71 (15.5%) vs. 4/54 (7.4%)]. Conclusions: Early intravitreal antibiotics and prompt vitrectomy to remove the contaminating IOFB may salvage useful vision in some patients with traumatic endophthalmitis with RIOFB. Delay of treatment for >24 h was associated with increased risk of traumatic endophthalmitis.

1.
Affeldt JC, Flynn HW, Forster RK, Mandelbaum S, Clarkson JG, Jarus GD: Microbial endophthalmitis resulting from ocular trauma. Ophthalmology 1987;94:407–413.
2.
Boldt HC, Pulido JS, Blodi CF, Folk JC, Weingeist TA: Rural endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 1989;96:1722–1726.
3.
Brinton GS, Topping TM, Hyndiuk RA, Aaberg TM, Reeser FH, Abrams GW: Posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:547–550.
4.
Thompson WS, Rubsamen PE, Flynn HW, Schiffman J, Cousins SW: Endophthalmitis after penetrating trauma. Ophthalmology 1995;102:1696–1701.
5.
Williams DF, Mieler WF, Abrams GW, Lewis H: Results and prognostic factors in penetrating ocular injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology 1988;95:911–916.
6.
Behrens-Baumann W, Praetorius G: Intraocular foreign bodies: 297 consecutive cases. Ophthalmologica 1989;198:84–88.
7.
Imrie FR, Cox A, Foot B, Macewen CJ: Surveillance of intraocular foreign bodies in the UK. Eye 2008;22:141–147.
8.
Al-Omran AM, Abboud EB, Abu El-Asrar AM: Microbiologic spectrum and visual outcome of posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Retina 2007;27:236–242.
9.
Jackson TL, Eykyn SJ, Graham EM, Stanford MR: Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: a 17-year prospective series and review of 267 reported cases. Surv Ophthalmol 2003;48:403–423.
10.
Wong JS, Chan TK, Lee HM, et al: Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis: an East Asian experience and a reappraisal of a severe ocular affliction. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1483–1491.
11.
Greenwald MJ, Wohl LG, Sell CH: Metastatic bacterial endophthalmitis: a contemporary reappraisal. Surv Ophthalmol 1986;31:81–101.
12.
Schemmer GB, Driebe WT: Posttraumatic Bacillus cereus endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:342–344.
13.
Vahey JB, Flynn HW: Results in the management of Bacillus endophthalmitis. Ophthalmic Surg 1991;22:681–686.
14.
Rubsamen PE, Cousins SW, Martinez JA: Impact of cultures on management decisions following surgical repair of penetrating ocular trauma. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers 1997:28:43–49.
15.
Parrish CM, O’Day DM: Traumatic endophthalmitis. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1987;27:112–119.
16.
Irvine WD, Flynn HW Jr, Miller D, Pflugfelder SC: Endophthalmitis caused by gram-negative organisms. Arch Ophthalmol 1992;110:1450–1454.
17.
Meyers-Elliot RH, Dethlefs BA: Experimental Klebsiella-induced endophthalmitis in the rabbit. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:1959–1963.
18.
Maxwell DP, Brent BD, Diamond JG, et al: Effect of intravitreal dexamethasone on ocular histopathology in a rabbit model of endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 1991;98:1370–1375.
19.
Thompson JT, Parver LM, Enger CL, Mieler WF, Ligget PE: Infectious endophthalmitis after penetrating injuries with retained intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmology 1993;100:1468–1474.
20.
Chaudhry IA, Shamsi FA, Al-Harthi E, Al-Theeb A, Elzaridi E, Riley FC: Incidence and visual outcome of endophthalmitis associated with intraocular foreign bodies. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:181–186.
21.
Essex RW, Yi Q, Charles PG, Allen PJ: Post-traumatic endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 2004;111:2015–2022.
22.
Hariprasad SM, Shah GK, Mieler WF, et al: Vitreous and aqueous penetration of orally administered moxifloxacin in humans. Arch Ophthalmol 2006;124:178–182.
23.
Knox FA, Best RM, Kinsella F, Mirza K, Sharkey JA, Mulholland D, Altaie R: Management of endophthalmitis with retained intraocular foreign body. Eye 2004;18:179–182.
24.
Soheilian M, Rafati N, Mohebbi MR, Yazdani S, Habibabadi HF, Feghhi M, Shahriary HA, Eslamipour J, Piri N, Peyman GA; Traumatic Endophthalmitis Trial Research Group: Prophylaxis of acute posttraumatic bacterial endophthalmitis: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial of intraocular antibiotic injection, report 2. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:460–465.
25.
Dille B: Toxicity of intraocular gentamicin. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1442.
26.
Essex RW, Lamoureux E, Charles PG, Allen P: Prophylaxis for posttraumatic endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 2008;126:743–744.
27.
Ferencz JR, Assia EI, Diamantstein L, Rubinstein E: Vancomycin concentration in the vitreous after intravenous and intravitreal administration for postoperative endophthalmitis. Arch Ophthalmol 1999;117:1023–1027.
28.
Schech JM, Alfaro DV 3rd, Laughlin RM, et al: Intravenous gentamicin and ceftazidime in penetrating ocular trauma: a swine model. Retina 1997;17:28–32.
29.
Narang S, Gupta V, Gupta A, et al: Role of prophylactic intravitreal antibiotics in open globe injuries. Indian J Ophthalmol 2003;51:39–44.
30.
Fosters RE, Martinez JA, Murray TG, Rubsamen PE, Flynn HW, Forster RK: Useful visual outcomes after treatment of Bacillus cereus endophthalmitis. Ophthalmology 1996;103:390–397.
31.
Szijártó Z, Gaál V, Kovács B, Kuhn F: Prognosis of penetrating eye injuries with posterior segment intraocular foreign body. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2008;246:161–165.
32.
Wickham L, Xing W, Bunce C, Sullivan P: Outcomes of surgery for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies – a retrospective review of 17 years of clinical experience. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2006;244:1620–1626.
33.
Soheilian M, Feghi M, Yazdani S, et al: Surgical management of nonmetallic and nonmagnetic metallic intraocular foreign bodies. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging 2005;36:189–196.
34.
Wani VB, Al-Ajmi M, Thalib L, Azad RV, Abul M, Al-Ghanim M, Sabti K: Vitrectomy for posterior segment intraocular foreign bodies: visual results and prognostic factors. Retina 2003;23:654–660.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.