Background/Aims: To provide an insight into the learning curve associated with scleral buckling surgery for an ophthalmologist on a fellowship course and to evaluate risk factors affecting outcomes during this period. Methods: Retrospective data were collected on 97 consecutive scleral buckling procedures (divided into 3 consecutive groups) performed by one surgeon (W.C.) beginning his first fellowship year. We evaluated the anatomic results, operative times and complications, and sought to identify risk factors of anatomic failure. Results: The single-operation success rate was 71.9% (23 of 32 eyes) in the first group, which was lower than 87.5% (28 of 32 eyes) in the second and 84.8% (28 of 33 eyes) in the third. The operative time was 106.3 min in the first, which is longer than 86.5 min in the second and 73.8 min in the third group. Factors predictive of unfavorable anatomic outcome were multiple breaks and multiple buckling procedures in the first 32 cases, and multiple breaks and breaks located posterior to the equator in the latter 65. Conclusion: Surgical experience of approximately 30 cases was required to achieve stable clinical results. Thus, a retinal surgeon at the beginning of his career may increase his success rate by careful case selection avoiding high-risk groups until he reaches the level of experience indicated by the learning curve.

Keywords:
Surgery, learning curve, Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment, Scleral buckle
1.
American Academy of Ophthalmology: The repair of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1313–1324.
2.
Kreissig I, Simader E, Rose D: Role of segmental buckling surgery in treatment of stage B and C proliferative vitreoretinopathy detachment: a long-term follow-up. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1994;205:336–343.
3.
Grizzard GW, Hilton GF: Scleral buckling for retinal detachments complicated by preretinal proliferation. Arch Ophthalmol 1982;100:419–422.
4.
Yoshida A, Ho PC, Schepens CL, McMeel JW, Duncan JE: Severe proliferative vitreoretinopathy and retinal detachment. Ophthalomology 1984;91:1538–1543.
5.
Kreiger AE, Hodgkinson J, Fredrick AR, Smith TR: The results of retinal detachment surgery. Arch Ophthalmol 1971;86:385–394.
6.
Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A: Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment without drainage. Am J Ophthalmol 1980;90:503–508.
7.
Grizzard WS, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, Taren D: A multiple analysis of anatomic success of retinal detachments treated with scleral buckling. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:1–7.
8.
Afrashi F, Akkin C, Egrilmez S, Erakgun T: Anatomic outcome of scleral buckling surgery in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Int Ophthalmol 2005;26:77–81.
9.
La Heij EC, Derhaag PF, Hendrikse F: Results of scleral buckling operations in primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Doc Ophthalmol 2000;100:17–25.
10.
Buchan J, Cazabon SJ, Morrell AJ, Woodhead J: Learning curve in endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy. Am J Ophthalmol 2003;136:570–580.
11.
Tabandeth H, Smeets B, Teimory M, Seward H: Learning phacoemulsification: the surgeon in training. Eye 1994;8:475–477.
12.
Kang JC, Jao SW, Chung MH, Feng CC, Chang YJ: The learning curve for hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc 2007;21:234–237.
13.
Randleman JB, Wolfe JD, Woodward M, Lynn MJ, Cherwek DH, Srivastava SK: The resident surgeon phacoemulsification learning curve. Arch Ophthalmol 2007;125:1215–1219.
14.
Prasad S: Phacoemulsification learning curve: experience of two junior trainee ohthalmologists. J Cataract Refract Surg 1998;24:73–77.
15.
Martin KG, Burton RL: The phacoemulsification learning curve: per-operative complications in the first 3,000 cases of an experienced surgeon. Eye 2000;14:190–195.
16.
Kreissig I, Rose D, Jost B: Minimized surgery for retinal detachments with segmental buckling and nondrainage: an 11-year follow-up. Retina 1992;12:224–231.
17.
Ho CL, Chen KJ, See LC: Selection of scleral buckling for primary retinal detachment. Ophthalmologica 2002;216:33–39.
18.
Gonin J: Treatment of detached retina by sealing the retinal tears. Arch Ophthalmol 1930;4:621.
19.
Hughes WF Jr: Evaluation of results of retinal detachment surgery. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1952;56:439–448.
20.
Tornquist R, Bodin L, Tornquist P: Retinal detachment: a study of a population-based patient material in Sweden, 1971–1981. Prediction of surgical outcome. Acta Ophthalmol 1988;66:637–642.
21.
Chignell AH, Fison LG, Davies EW, Hartley RE, Gundry MF: Failure in retinal detachment surgery. Br J Ophthalmol 1973;57:525–530.
22.
Schepens CL: Management of retinal detachment. Ophthalmic Surg 1994;25:427–431.
23.
Tani P, Robertson DM, Langworthy A: Prognosis for central vision and anatomic reattachment in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with macula detached. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:611–620.
24.
Sharma T, Challa JK, Ravishankar KV, Murugesan R: Scleral buckling for retinal detachment: Predictors of anatomic failure. Retina 1994;14:338–343.
© 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel
2009
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.