Purpose: To compare the clinical results of the spherical aberration-free Akreos AO™ (Bausch & Lomb) with the Akreos Adapt™ (Bausch & Lomb), the parent model of spherical optic design. Methods: Fifty patients (100 eyes) were randomly assigned to bilaterally receive Akreos AO or Akreos Adapt intraocular lenses (IOLs) after phacoemulsification. At 6 months postoperatively, best-corrected contrast sensitivities were determined at 3, 4.8, 7.5, 12 and 19 cycles per degree using a Visual Capacity Analyzer (L2 Informatique) under mesopic (5 cd/m2) and photopic (100 cd/m2) conditions with undilated pupils. Wavefront analysis of total aberration was performed with the WaveScan WaveFront System (Advanced Medical Optics VISX). Results: Postoperative contrast sensitivities were not statistically different under mesopic and photopic conditions. On the other hand, fourth-order spherical aberration was lower in the AO group than the Adapt group with only a marginal difference (p = 0.048). Other higher-order aberrations such as coma and trefoil were not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.657, 0.614). The questionnaire on subjective visual quality in terms of glare disability, distant vision and night driving did not reveal an improved visual function in the AO group. Conclusion: The spherical aberration-free Akreos AO IOL did not show improved visual quality compared with its spherical counterpart.

1.
Alió JL, Schimchak P, Negri HP, Montés-Micó R: Crystalline lens optical dysfunction through aging. Ophthalmology 2005;112:2022–2029.
2.
Guirao A, González C, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Artal P: Average optical performance of the human eye as a function of age in a normal population. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1999;40:203–213.
3.
Puell MC, Palomo C, Sánchez-Ramos C, Villena C: Normal values for photopic and mesopic letter contrast sensitivity. J Refract Surg 2004;20:484–488.
4.
Guirao A, Redondo M, Geraghty E, Piers P, Norrby S, Artal P: Corneal optical aberrations and retinal image quality in patients in whom monofocal intraocular lenses were implanted. Arch Ophthalmol 2002;120:1143–1151.
5.
Holladay JT, Piers PA, Koranyi G, van der Mooren M, Norrby NE: A new intraocular lens design to reduce spherical aberration of pseudophakic eyes. J Refract Surg 2002;18:683–691.
6.
Bellucci R, Morselli S, Piers P: Comparison of wavefront aberrations and optical quality of eyes implanted with five different intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2004;20:297–306.
7.
Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS, Piers PA: Improved functional vision with a modified prolate intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2004;30:986–992.
8.
Ricci F, Scuderi G, Missiroli F, Cerulli A: Low contrast visual acuity in pseudophakic patients implanted with an anterior surface modified prolate intraocular lens. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2004;82:718–722.
9.
Bellucci R, Scialdone A, Buratto L, Morselli S, Chierego C, Criscuoli A, Moretti G, Piers P: Visual acuity and contrast sensitivity comparison between Tecnis and Acrysof SA60AT intraocular lenses: a multicenter randomized study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:712–717.
10.
Franchini A: Comparative assessment of contrast with spherical and aspherical intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1307–1319.
11.
Kasper T, Bühren J, Kohnen T: Intraindividual comparison of higher-order aberrations after implantation of aspherical and spherical intraocular lenses as a function of pupil diameter. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:78–84.
12.
Muñoz G, Albarrán-Diego C, Montés-Micó R, Rodríguez-Galietero A, Alió JL: Spherical aberration and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with the Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:1320–1327.
13.
Mester U, Dillinger P, Anterist N: Impact of a modified optic design on visual function: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:652–660.
14.
Altmann GE, Nichamin LD, Lane SS, Pepose JS: Optical performance of 3 intraocular lens designs in the presence of decentration. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:574–585.
15.
Nio Y-K, Jansonius NM, Geraghty E, Norrby S, Kooijman AC: Effect of intraocular lens implantation on visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, and depth of focus. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:2073–2081.
16.
Cantú R, Rosales MA, Tepichín E, Curioca A, Montes V, Bonilla J: Whole eye wavefront aberrations in Mexican male subjects. J Refract Surg 2004;20:685–688.
17.
Naseri A, McLeod SD, Lietman T: Evaluating the human optical system: corneal topography and wavefront analysis. Ophthalmol Clin North Am 2001;14:269–273.
18.
Denoyer A, Le Lez ML, Majzoub S, Pisella PJ: Quality of vision after cataract surgery after Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lens implantation: effect of contrast sensitivity and wavefront aberration improvements on the quality of daily vision. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:210–216.
19.
Johansson B, Sundelin S, Wikberg-Matsson A, Unsbo P, Behndig A: Visual and optical performance of the Akreos Adapt Advanced Optics and Tecnis Z9000 intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1565–1572.
20.
Tzelikis PF, Akaishi L, Trindade FC, Boteon JE: Ocular aberrations and contrast sensitivity after cataract surgery with Acrysof IQ intraocular lens implantation: clinical comparative study. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:1918–1924.
21.
Kurz S, Krummenauer F, Thieme H, Dick HB: Contrast sensitivity after implantation of a spherical versus an aspherical intraocular lens in biaxial microincision cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:393–400.
22.
Packer M, Fine IH, Hoffman RS: Aspheric intraocular lens selection: the evolution of refractive cataract surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2008;19:1–4.
23.
Pesudovs K, Dietze H, Stewart OG, Noble BA, Cox MJ: Effect of cataract surgery incision location and intraocular lens type on ocular aberrations. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:725–734.
24.
Applegate RA, Marsack JD, Ramos R, Sarver EJ: Interaction between aberrations to improve or reduce visual performance. J Cataract Refract Surg 2003;29:1487–1495.
25.
Artal P, Chen L, Fernández EJ, Singer B, Manzanera S, Williams DR: Adaptive optics for vision: the eye’s adaptation to point spread function. J Refract Surg 2003;19:585–587.
26.
Beiko GH, Haigis W, Steinmueller A: Distribution of corneal spherical aberration in a comprehensive ophthalmology practice and whether keratometry can predict aberration values. J Cataract Refract Surg 2007;33:848–858.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.