This study was performed to determine whether there are differences in tear constituents between normal persons and patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) and to correlate differences in tear composition with the degree of PANDO. We tested 30 normal persons (mean age 42.0 ± 21.4 years) and 34 PANDO patients (mean age 44.8 ± 17.9 years) consisting of 18 cases with complete obstruction and 16 cases with partial obstruction. We measured the pH, the concentration of Na+, K+, Cl, total calcium and total protein of the tears. The composition of tear protein was assessed by cellulose acetate electrophoresis. The data were analyzed by a t test. The pH was more alkaline in patients with PANDO (7.11 ± 0.38), especially in cases with complete obstruction (7.14 ± 0.30, p = 0.47) compared with the normal persons (6.94 ± 0.35). The concentration of Na+, K+, Cl and total protein were similar in normal and PANDO cases, while total calcium concentration was significantly higher in PANDO (2.62 ± 1.70 mg/dl) compared with the normal cases (1.73 ± 0.97 mg/dl), (p = 0.015). This change was found in both cases with complete obstruction (2.47 ± 1.25 mg/dl, p = 0.027) and cases with partial obstruction (3.00 ± 2.16 mg/dl, p = 0.009). PANDO patients had lower levels of tear protein fraction (TPF) 1 (p = 0.006) and higher levels of tear TPF 4 (p = 0.000) than normal persons. Tears in PANDO cases were more alkaline, higher in calcium concentration, and unstable in the proportion of tear proteins compared with normal persons. These results may improve our understanding of tear physiology and the pathogenesis of PANDO.

Norn MS: Tear fluid pH in normals, contact lens wearers, and pathologic cases. Acta Ophthalmol 1988;66:485–489.
Saaki K: Measurement of pH, time-dependent-changes in pH, Na+, and K+ in human tear composition between normal subjects, subjects with decreased tear secretion, and contact lens wearers. Nippon Ganja Gakhai Zasshi 1995:99:676–682.
Fullard RJ, Tucker DL: Changes in human tear protein levels with progressively increasing stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2290–2301.
Calceria JAF, Luthold WW, Sabbaga E: Tear calcium levels in normal subjects. Ophthalmologica 1982;184:114–119.
Paulsen F: The human nasolacrimal ducts. Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol 2003;170:1–106.
Fullard RJ, Synder C: Protein levels in non-stimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1119–1126.
Bjerrum KB, Prause JU: Collection and concentration of tear proteins studied by SDS gel electrophoresis: Presentation of a new method with special reference to dry eye patients. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:402–405.
Lundh RL, Liotet S, Pouliquen Y: Study of the human blood-tear barrier and the biochemical changes in the tears of 30 contact lens wearers (50 eyes). Ophthalmologica 1984;188:100–105.
Saari KM, Aine E, Posz A, Klockars M: Lysozyme content of tears in normal subjects and in patients with external eye infections. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983;221:86–88.
Chao CW, Stuebben AM, Butala SM: Characterization of ocular mucus extracts by crossed immunoelectrophoretic techniques. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1127–1135.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.