Dacryolithiasis is one of the causes of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction, although its origin is unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in tear constituents between patients with nasolacrimal duct obstruction with dacryoliths and those without dacryoliths. In a prospective case-control study, undiluted tears were collected from 30 eyes from 30 patients with partial acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO) consisting of 17 PANDO patients with dacryoliths and 13 PANDO patients without dacryoliths. The pH, and the Na+, K+, Cl–, total calcium and total protein concentrations were determined. The composition of the tear proteins was assessed by cellulose acetate electrophoresis. In the tear samples from 17 eyes with PANDO/dacryoliths, the mean ± SD K+ level was 15.6 ± 3.1 mEq/l. In the tear samples from 13 PANDO controls, the mean ± SD K+ level was 19.8 ± 4.9 mEq/l. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.02). In the tear samples from PANDO/dacryolith patients, the mean ± SD total protein level was 129.0 ± 72.9 mg/dl. In the tear samples from the PANDO controls the mean ± SD total protein level was 261.6 ± 132.5 mg/dl. The difference between the two groups was statistically significant (p = 0.00). In the tear protein fractions from electrophoresis, a low level of lysozyme was observed in the PANDO/dacryolith samples compared with the PANDO control samples (p = 0.03). The tears from patients with PANDO due to dacryoliths showed a change in the concentrations of electrolytes and protein, particularly lysozyme, compared with that of the patients with PANDO without dacryoliths, which may be related to the pathogenesis of dacryoliths.

Keywords:
Dacryolith, Nasolacrimal duct obstruction, Tear
1.
Yazici B, Hammad AM, Meyer DR: Lacrimal sac dacryoliths: Predictive factors and clinical characteristics. Ophthalmology 2001;108:1308–1312.
2.
Andreou P, Rose GE: Clinical presentation of patients with dacryolithiasis. Ophthalmology 2002;109:1573–1574.
3.
Hawes MJ: The dacryolithiasis syndrome. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 1988;4:87–90.
4.
Wearne MJ, Pitts J, Frank J, Rose GE: Comparison of dacryocystography and lacrimal scintigraphy in the diagnosis of functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Br J Ophthalmol 1999;83:1032–1035.
5.
Waite DW, Whittet HB, Shun-Shin GA: Technical note: Computed tomographic dacryocystography. Br J Radiol 1993;66:711–713.
6.
Norn MS: Tear fluid pH in normals, contact lens wearers, and pathological cases. Acta Ophthalmol 1988;66:485–489.
7.
Saaki K: Measurement of pH, time-dependent-changes in pH, Na+, and K+ in human tears-composition between normal subjects, subjects with decreased tear secretion, and contact lens wearers. Nippon Ganja Gakhai Zasshi 1995;99:676–682.
8.
Bachman WG, Wilson G: Essential ions for maintenance of the corneal epithelial surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1985;26:1484–1488.
9.
Caldeira JAF, Luthold WW, Sabbaga E: Tear calcium levels in normal subjects. Ophthalmologica 1982;184:114–119.
10.
Iliadelis E, Karabatakis V, Sofoniou M: Dacryoliths in chronic dacryocystitis and their composition (spectrophotometric analysis). Eur J Ophthalmol 1999;9:266–268.
11.
Fullard RJ, Tucker DL: Changes in human tear protein levels with progressively increasing stimulus. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1991;32:2290–2301.
12.
Fullard RJ, Synder C: Protein levels in non-stimulated and stimulated tears of normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:1119–1126.
13.
Bjerrum KB, Prause JU: Collection and concentration of tear proteins studied by SDS gel electrophoresis: Presentation of a new method with special reference to dry eye patients. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1994;232:402–405.
14.
Lundh RL, Liotet S, Pouliquen Y: Study of the human blood-tear barrier and the biochemical changes in the tears of 30 contact lens wearers (50 eyes). Ophthalmologica 1984;188:100–105.
15.
Saari KM, Aine E, Posz A, Klockars M: Lysozyme content of tears in normal subjects and in patients with external eye infections. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1983;221:86–88.
16.
Orhan M, Onerci M, Dayanir V, Orhan D, Irkec T, Irkec M: Lacrimal sac dacryolith: A study with atomic absorption spectrophotometry and scanning electron microscopy. Eur J Ophthalmol 1996;6:478–480.
© 2004 S. Karger AG, Basel
2004
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.