Purpose: To evaluate the relationship between age and retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness in normal subjects, as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT). Methods: One hundred and forty-four normal subjects (144 eyes), ranging from 16 to 84 years of age, were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The RNFL thickness was determined using OCT with three circle scans 3.4 mm in diameter. Results: The average RNFL thickness was inversely correlated with age (r = –0.348, p < 0.001). Analyzing the quadrants as a parameter, RNFL thickness in the superior, temporal and inferior quadrants also decreased with age. Using 30-degree segments, there were significant correlations between age and the RNFL thickness of temporal segments (7–11 o’clock). The average RNFL thickness had the highest correlation among all parameters (r = –0.348, p < 0.001). Regarding nasal quadrant thickness, RNFL ratios (average, superior, temporal and inferior RNFL thickness relative to the nasal quadrant thickness) were not significantly correlated with age. The refractive error did not affect RNFL thickness (r = 0.091, p = 0.276). Conclusion: Our study revealed that RNFL thickness, in particular in the temporal quadrant, measured by OCT significantly decreased with age. Age has to be taken into consideration when we compare RNFL thickness between normal and glaucomatous eyes.

Keywords:
Optical coherence tomography, Retinal nerve fiber layer, Age, Normal eye
1.
Schuman JS, Hee MR, Arya AV, Pedut-Kloizman T, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG, Swanson EA: Optical coherence tomography: A new tool for glaucoma diagnosis. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 1995;6:89–95.
2.
Hee MR, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Huang D, Schuman JS, Lin CP, Hertzmark E, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG: Optical coherence tomography of the human retina. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:325–332.
3.
Schuman JS, Hee MR, Puliafito CA, Wong C, Pedut-Kloizman T, Lin CP, Hertzmark E, Izatt JA, Swanson EA, Fujimoto JG: Quantification of nerve fiber layer tickness in normal and glaucomatous eyes using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 1995;113:586–596.
4.
Pieroth L, Schuman JS, Hertzmark E, Hee MTR, Wilkins JR, Coker J, Mattox C, Pedut-Kloizman R, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG, Swanson E: Evaluation of focal defects of the nerve fiber layer using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 1999;106:570–579.
5.
Mistlberger A, Liebmann JM, Greenfield DS, Pons ME, Hoh ST, Ishikawa H, Ritch R: Heidelberg retina tomography and optical coherence tomography in normal, ocular-hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Ophthalmology 1999;106:2027–2032.
6.
Bowd C, Weinreb RN, Williams JM, Zangwill LM: The retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in ocular hypertensive, normal, and glaucomatous eyes with optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:22–26.
7.
Hoh ST, Greenfield DS, Mistlberger A, Liebmann JM, Ishikawa H, Ritch R: Optical coherence tomography and scanning laser polarimetry in normal, ocular hypertensive, and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 2000;129:129–135.
8.
Zangwill LM, Williams J, Berry CC, Knauer S, Weinreb RN: A comparison of optical coherence tomography and retinal nerve fiber layer photography for detection of nerve fiber layer damage in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 2000;107:1309–1315.
9.
Pons ME, Ishikawa H, Gurses-Ozden R, Liebmann JM, Dou HL, Ritch R: Assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer internal reflectivity in eyes with and without glaucoma using optical coherence tomography. Arch Ophthalmol 2000;118:1044–1047.
10.
Greaney MJ, Hoffman DC, Garway-Heath DF, Nakla M, Coleman AL, Caprioli J: Comparison of optic nerve imaging methods to distinguish normal eyes from those with glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2002;43:140–145.
11.
Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Berry CC, Blumenthal EZ, Vasile C, Sanchez-Galeana C, Bosworth CF, Sample PA, Weinreb RN: Detecting early glaucoma by assessment of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness and visual function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:1993–2003.
12.
Quigley HA, Brown AE, Morrison JD, Drance SM: The size and shape of the optic disc in normal human eyes. Arch Ophthalmol 1990:108:51–57.
13.
Weinreb RN, Shakiba S, Zangwill L: Scanning laser polarimetry to measure the nerve fiber layer of normal and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol 1995;119:627–636.
14.
Chi QM, Tomita G, Inazumi K: Evaluation of the effect of aging on the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness using scanning laser polarimetry. J Glaucoma 1995;4:406–413.
15.
Poinoosawmy D, Fontana L, Wu JX, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA: Variation of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements with age and ethnicity by scanning laser polarimetry. Br J Ophthalmol 1997;81:350–354.
16.
Toprak AB, Yilmaz OF: Relation of optic disc topography and age to thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer as measured using scanning laser polarimetry, in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:473–478.
17.
Balaszi AG, Rootman J, Drance SM: Ageing and optic nerve. Am J Ophthalmol 1984;97:760–766.
18.
Mikelberg FS, Yidegiligne HM, White VA, Schulzer M: Relation between optic nerve axon number and axon diameter to scleral canal area. Ophthalmology 1991;98:60–63.
19.
Jonas JB, Muller-Berg JA, Schlotzer-Schrehardt UM, Naumann GO: Histomorphometry of the human optic nerve. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1990;31:736–744.
20.
Funaki S, Shirakashi M, Abe H: Relation between size of optic disc and thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer in normal subjects. Br J Ophthalmol 1998;82:1242–1245.
21.
Funaki S, Shirakashi M, Funaki H, Yaoeda K, Abe H: Relationship between age and thickness of retinal nerve fiber layer in normal subjects. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1999;43:180–185.
22.
Blumenthal EZ, Williams JM, Weinreb RN, Girkin CA, Berry CC, Zangwill LM: Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements by use of optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 2000;107:2278–2282.
23.
Schuman JS, Pedut-Kloizman T, Hertzmark E, Hee MR, Wilkins JR, Coker JG, Puliafito CA, Fujimoto JG, Swanson EA: Reproducibility of nerve fiber layer thickness measurements using optical coherence tomography. Ophthalmology 1996;103:1889–1898.
24.
Tjon-Fo-Sang MJ, de Vries J, Lemij HG: Measurement by nerve fiber analyzer of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal subjects and patients with ocular hypertension. Am J Ophthalmol 1996;122:220–227.
25.
Caprioli J: The contour of the juxtapapillary nerve fiber layer in glaucoma. Ophthalmology 1990;97:358–365.
26.
Varma R, Skaf M, Barron E: Retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in normal human eyes. Ophthalmology 1996;103:2114–2119.
27.
Bowd C, Zangwill LM, Blumenthal REZ, Vasile C, Boehm AG, Gokhale PA, Mohammadi K, Amini P, Sankary TM, Weinreb RN: Imaging of the optic disc and retinal nerve fiber layer: The effects of age, optic disc area, refractive error, and gender. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis 2002;19:197–207.
28.
Jones JB, Schmidt AM, Muller-Bergh JA, Schlotzer-Schrehardt UM, Naumann GO: Human optic nerve count and optic disc size. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:2012–2018.
29.
Repka MX, Quigley HA: The effect of age on normal human optic nerve fiber number and diameter. Ophthalmology 1989;96:26–32.
30.
Provis JM, van Driel D, Billson FA, Russell P: Human fetal optic nerve: Overproduction and elimination of retinal axons during development. J Comp Neurol 1985;238:92–100.
31.
Ozdek SC, Onol M, Gurelik G, Hasanreisoglu B: Scanning laser polarimetry in normal subjects and patients with myopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2000;84:264–267.
32.
Bayraktar S, Bayraktar Z, Yilmaz OF: Influence of scan radius correction for ocular magnification and relationship between scan radius with retinal nerve fiber layer thickness measured by optical coherence tomography. J Glaucoma 2001;10:163–169.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.