Purpose: To study the effects of air pollution on the eyes of persons staying in the metropolis of New Delhi. Materials and Methods: 400 healthy volunteers from within and outside the metropolis of Delhi were investigated for the presence of tear film abnormalities. All persons underwent slitlamp examination to rule out any ocular surface disorder. The tear break-up time (BUT) was assessed along with a Schirmer test and the tear lysozyme activity and the tear pH were determined. Results: Of the 210 persons staying in the metropolis, 50 (24%) had an abnormal BUT, 14 (6.6%) had an abnormal Schirmer test, and the tear lysozyme activity was found to be low in 12 (5%). In contrast, of those 190 persons living outside the metropolis, only 10 (5.2%) had an abnormal BUT, 4 (2%) had an abnormal Schirmer test, and none had a low lysozyme activity (p < 0.05). None of the persons in either group had significant eye symptoms. Conclusions: Tear film abnormalities are present in a large number of people staying within the metropolis of New Delhi who have apparently normal eyes. Air pollution over a long period of time could possibly be associated with their causation.

1.
Paschides CA, Stefanuotou M, Papageorgiou J: Ocular surface and environmental changes. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1988;76:74–77.
2.
Versura P, Profazio V, Cellini M, Toreggiani A, Caramazza R: Eye discomfort and air pollution. Ophthalmologica 1999;213:103–109.
3.
Kjærgaard S, Pedersen OF: Dust exposure, eye redness, eye cytology and mucous membrane irritation in a tobacco industry. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 1989;61:519–529.
4.
Lemp MA: Breakup of the tear film. Int Ophthalmol Clin 1973;13:97–102.
5.
Mackie IA, Seal DV: Quantitative tear lysozyme assay in units of activity per microlitre. Br J Ophthalmol 1976;60:70–74.
6.
Chang HA, Tseng SC: Characterization of precorneal mucus layer. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1992;33:951–955.
7.
Tseng SC, Hirst LW, Maunmenee AE, Kenyon KR, Sun TT, Green WR: Possible mechanisms for the loss of goblet cells in mucin deficient disorders. Ophthalmology 1984;91:545–552.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.