Purpose: Besides immunological graft rejection, persistently increased intraocular pressure (IOP) is among the most important causes for graft failure after penetrating keratoplasty (PK). The purpose of this study was to assess the longitudinal development of IOP after PK and to investigate possible correlations with corneal endothelial cell density. Methods: This longitudinal prospective study included 209 eyes after PK with a complete follow-up at 3 months, 6 months, before first suture removal (16 ± 5 months) and after complete suture removal (21 ± 5 months). At each examination, IOP was measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry. Endothelial cell density was assessed by specular microscopy (EM 1100, Tomey). The indications for PK were 48% keratoconus, 34% Fuchs’ dystrophy, 5.4% stromal dystrophies, 8.6% secondary bullous keratopathy and 4% corneal scars. An iridotomy was performed routinely during PK. The postoperative treatment with topical steroids was standardized. Results: Preoperatively, the mean IOP was 13.6 ± 2.9 mm Hg with increased IOP (>21 mm Hg) in 2.0% of eyes. After 3 months, the incidence of increased IOP (24.5 ± 4.6 mm Hg) was highest (6.7%) and decreased thereafter to 3.0% after complete suture removal. No patients showed IOP higher than 30 mm Hg. A persistently increased IOP for more than 3 months was seen in 2% of patients. At 3 months postoperatively, the mean endothelial cell density was 1,977 ± 496/mm2 and did not decrease significantly (p > 0.05) until 6 months (1,771 ± 507 cells/mm2). At the end of the follow-up period, the mean endothelial cell density was significantly reduced (1,347 ± 501 cells/mm2). There was no significant correlation between IOP and mean endothelial cell density at any postoperative examination stage (p > 0.24). Patients with persistently increased IOP for more than 3 months did not have significantly different endothelial cell densities in comparison with those without increased IOP. Conclusion: From 6 months after PK, the incidence of increased IOP was not higher than the preoperative level. Mild to moderate temporary IOP elevations after PK do not seem to affect the endothelial cell density of the graft until complete suture removal. Further long-term studies are necessary to assess the clinical relevance of these observations.

Keywords:
Penetrating keratoplasty, Intraocular pressure, Graft endothelium, Glaucoma, Suture removal
1.
Foulks GN: Glaucoma associated with penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1987;94:871–874.
2.
Goldberg DB, Schanzlin DJ, Brown SI: Incidence of increased intraocular pressure after keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1981;92:372–377.
3.
Kirckness CM, Ficker LA: Risk factors for the development of postkeratoplasty glaucoma. Cornea 1992;11:427–432.
4.
Polack FM: Glaucoma in keratoplasty. Cornea 1988;7:67–70.
5.
Foulks GN, Perry HD, Dohlmann CH: Oversize corneal donor graft in penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1979;86:490–494.
6.
Zimmermann T, Olson R, Waltman S, Kaufman H: Transplant size and elevated intraocular pressure: Postkeratoplasty. Arch Ophthalmol 1978;96:2231–2233.
7.
Hoffmann F: Nahttechnik bei perforierender Keratoplastik. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1976;169:584–590.
8.
Naumann GOH: Iris ischemia following penetrating keratoplasty for keratoconus (Urrets-Zavalia syndrome) (letter). Cornea 1997;16:120–121.
9.
Naumann GOH, Seitz B, Lang GK, Langenbucher A, Kus MM: Excimer Laser 193-nm Trepanation bei der perforierenden Keratoplastik – Bericht über die ersten 70 Patienten. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1993;203:252–261.
10.
Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Küchle M, Naumann GOH: Immunologische Transplantatreaktionen nach nichtmechanischer Hornhauttrepanation mit dem Excimerlaser. Ophthalmologe 1998;95:607–618.
11.
Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Küchle M, Naumann GOH: Nonmechanical corneal trephination with the excimer laser improves outcome after penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1999;106:1156–1165.
12.
Charlin R, Polack FM: The effect of elevated intraocular pressure on the endothelium of corneal grafts. Cornea 1982;1:241–249.
13.
Olsen T: The endothelial cell damage in acute glaucoma: On the corneal thickness response to intraocular pressure. Acta Ophthalmol 1980;58:257–266.
14.
Naumann GOH, Sautter H: Surgical procedures of the cornea; in Blodi FC, Mackensen G, Neubauer H (eds): Surgical Ophthalmology 1. Berlin, Springer, 1991, pp 433–507.
15.
Naumann GOH: Corneal transplantation in anterior segment diseases: The Bowman lecture (No 56) part II. Eye 1995;9:395–424.
16.
Polack FM: Keratoplasty in aphakic eyes with corneal edema: Results in 100 cases with 10-year follow-up. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1979;77:657–673.
17.
Reinhard T, Kallmann C, Cepin A, Godehardt E, Sundmacher R: The influence of glaucoma history on graft survival after penetrating keratoplasty. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1997;235:553–557.
18.
Thoft RA, Gordon JM, Dohlmann CH: Glaucoma following keratoplasty. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol 1974;78:352–365.
19.
Wood TO, West C, Kaufmann HE: Control of intraocular pressure in penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1972;74:724–728.
20.
Olson RJ, Kaufmann HE: Prognostic factors of intraocular pressure after aphakic keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;86:510–515.
21.
Nguyen NX, Langenbucher A, Seitz B, Küchle M: Häufigkeit und Risikofaktoren der Augeninnendruckerhöhung nach perforierender Keratoplastik. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 2000;217:77–81.
22.
Irvine AR, Kaufman HE: Intraocular pressure following penetrating keratoplasty. Am J Ophthalmol 1969;68:835–844.
23.
Knorr HLJ, Händel A, Naumann GOH: Morphometrische und qualitative Veränderungen des Hornhautendothels bei primär chronischem Offenwinkelglaukom. Fortschr Ophthalmol 1991;88:18–120.
24.
Seitz B, Müller EE, Langenbucher A, Kus MM, Naumann GOH: Endotheliale Keratopathie bei Pseudoexfoliationssyndrom: Quantitative und qualitative Morphometrie mittels automatisierter Videobildanalyse. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1995;207:167–175.
25.
Waltman SR, Yarian D, Hart W, Becker B: Corneal endothelial changes with long-term topical epinephrine therapy. Arch Ophthalmol 1977;95:1357–1358.
26.
Korey M, Gieser D, Kass MA, Waltman SR, Gordon M, Becker B: Central corneal endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness in ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:610–616.
27.
Ing JJ, Ing HH, Nelson LR, Hodge DO, Bourne WM: Ten-yer postoperative results of penetrating keratoplasty. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1855–1865.
28.
Bigar F: Specular microscopy of the corneal endothelium: Optical solutions and clinical results. Dev Ophthalmol 1982;6:1–94.
29.
Selata K: Corneal endothelial cell density after an attack of acute glaucoma. Acta Ophthalmol 1979;57:1004–1009.
30.
Melamed S, Ben-Sira I, Ben Shaul Y: Corneal endothelial changes under induced intraocular pressure elevations: A scanning and transmission electron microscopic study in rabbits. Br J Ophthalmol 1980;64:164–169.
31.
Svedbergh B: Effects of artificial intraocular pressure elevation on the corneal endothelium in the vervet monkey (Cercopithecus aethiops). Acta Ophthalmol 1975;53:839–853.
© 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel
2002
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.