Objective: To analyze risk factors in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). Patients and Methods: Four hundred forty-seven surviving very-low-birth-weight infants (birth weight ≤1,500 g) were enrolled in a retrospective study. Clinical data underwent multivariate analysis using stepwise logistic forward regression. Results: For 402 of the babies a complete dataset of 38 possible risk factors was available. Multivariate analysis showed 10 factors to be independently significant variables. Low birth weight, low gestational age, artificial ventilation for more than 7 days, high volume of blood transfusion and surfactant therapy were risk factors associated with higher rates of ROP. Necrotizing enterocolitis, maternal pre-eclampsia, lung maturation by antepartum betamethasone application, vitamin E and phototherapy were accompanied by a lower incidence of ROP. Conclusions: This study confirms several risk factors recognized by previous statistical analysis. In addition, this study reveals maternal pre-eclampsia, which is associated with chronic intrauterine stress, as a statistically independent factor and as having an influence on the incidence of ROP.

1.
Lucey JL, Dangman B: A re-examination of the role of oxygen in retrolental fibroplasia. Pediatrics 1984;73:82–96.
2.
The Committee for the Classification of Retinopathy of Prematurity: An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 1984;102:1130–1134.
3.
The International Committee for the Classification of the Late Stages of Retinopathy of Prematurity: An international classification of retinopathy of prematurity. II. The classification of retinal detachment. Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:906–912. (Erratum: Arch Ophthalmol 1987;105:1498.)
4.
BMDP – Biomedical Computer Programs, P series. Los Angeles, Health Sciences Computing Facility, Department of Biomathematics, School of Medicine, University of California, 1979.
5.
Bossi E, Koerner F: Influence of statistical methodology and composition of patient populations on the correlation of risk factors with retinopathy of prematurity. Doc Ophthalmol Proc Ser 1988;50:141–146.
6.
Bossi E, Koerner F, Flury B, Zulauf M: Retinopathy of prematurity: A risk factor analysis with univariate and multivariate statistics. Helv Paediatr Acta 1984;39:307–317.
7.
Flynn JT: Acute proliferative retrolental fibroplasia: Multivariate risk analysis. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1983;81:549–591.
8.
Hammer ME, Mullen PW, Ferguson JG, Pai S, Cosby C, Jackson KL: Logistic analysis of risk factors in acute retinopathy of prematurity. Am J Ophthalmol 1986;102:1–6.
9.
Hittner HM, Godio LB, Rudolph AJ, Adams JM, Garcia-Prats JA, Friedman Z, Kautz JA, Monaco WA: Retrolental fibroplasia: Efficacy of vitamin E in a double-blind clinical study of preterm infants. N Engl J Med 1981;305:1365–1371.
10.
Inamochi K, Takenaka Y: Statistical analysis of causative factors in retinopathy of prematurity. Rinsho Ganka (Jpn J Clin Ophthalmol) 1989;43:763–767.
11.
Koerner F, Bossi E, Wetzek C, Flury B: Retinopathy of prematurity: The influence of gestational age and retinal maturity on the statistical behavior of risk factors. Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1986;22:40–45.
12.
Kinsey VE, Arnold HJ, Kalina RE, Stern L, Stahlman M, Odell G, Driscoll JM, Elliott JH, Payne J, Patz A: PaO2 levels and retrolental fibroplasia: A report of the cooperative study. Pediatrics 1977;60:655–668.
13.
Majima A: Studies on retinopathy of prematurity. I. Statistical analysis of factors related to occurrence and progression in active phase. Jpn J Ophthalmol 1977;21:404–420.
14.
Prendiville A, Schulenburg WE: Clinical factors associated with retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Dis Child 1988;63:522–527.
15.
Gunn TR, Easdown J, Outerbridge EW, Aranda JV: Risk factors in retrolental fibroplasia. Pediatrics 1980;65:1096–1100.
16.
Sacks LM, Schaffer DB, Anday EK, Peckham GJ, Delivoria-Papadopoulos M: Retrolental fibroplasia and blood transfusion in very low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 1981;68:770–774.
17.
Shohat M, Reisner SH, Krikler R, Nissenkorn I, Yassur Y, Ben-Sira I: Retinopathy of prematurity: Incidence and risk factors. Pediatrics 1983;72:159–163.
18.
Yu VYH, Hookham DM, Nave JRM: Retrolental fibroplasia – Controlled study of 4 years’ experience in a neonatal intensive care unit. Arch Dis Child 1982;57:247–252.
19.
von Loewenich V, Illies-Wilbrand A: Frühgeborenen-Retinopathie III: Mehrlingsgeburt, Transfusionen, Prostaglandinhemmer, Apnoeanfälle, Sepsis u.a. Risikofaktoren; in Körner F, Bossi E (eds): Die Retinopathie des Frühgeborenen. Stuttgart, Fischer, 1984, pp 160–172.
20.
Repka MX, Hardy RJ, Phelps DL, Summers CG: Surfactant prophylaxis and retinopathy of prematurity. Arch Ophthalmol 1993;111:618–620.
21.
Hadi HA, Hobbs CL: Effect of chronic intrauterine stress on the disappearance of tunica vasculosa lentis of the fetal eye: A neonatal observation. Am J Perinatol 1990;7:23–25.
22.
Johnson L, Quinn GE, Abbasi S, Otis C, Goldstein D, Sacks L, Porat R, Fong E, Delivoria-Papadopoulos M, Peckham G, Schaffer DB, Bowen FW: Effect of sustained pharmacologic vitamin E levels on incidence and severity of retinopathy of prematurity: A controlled clinical trial. J Pediatr 1989;114:827–838.
23.
Riley PA, Slater TF: Pathogenesis of retrolental fibroplasia. Lancet 1969;ii:265.
24.
Tooley WH, Hoffman JIE: Caution about statistics of retrolental fibroplasia study. Pediatrics 1977;60:754–756.
25.
Flury B: Frühgeborenen-Retinopathie: Gedanken zur Anwendung statistischer Methoden; in Körner F, Bossi E (eds): Die Retinopathie des Frühgeborenen. Stuttgart, Fischer, 1984, pp 201–215.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.