A total of 48 corneal smears from rabbits were obtained by means of brush, cotton swab and spatula techniques. The cytomorphologic features in those methods are compared. In the smears prepared by brush, numerous corneal epithelial cells were found. The cells were well spread in a single layer and overlapping was uncommon. The morphology of the corneal cells was satisfactory for cytologic evaluation. In contrast, the other two methods lacked adequate numbers of cells and cell preservation. We feel that corneal epithelial cells are readily obtainable by the brush method, compared with the cotton swab and spatula methods, and the material is also ideally suited for cytologic evaluation. It can be easily used for corneal cytology in clinical situations.

Keywords:
Corneal cytology, Brush cytology, Sampling technique, Herpetic keratitis
© 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel
1986
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.