Introduction: Vision loss is common in patients treated with radiotherapy for uveal melanoma. With proton beam irradiation (PBI), the prescribed dose is delivered to the tumor with a sharp dose reduction outside the target volume. However, radiation complications are likely to develop when tumors are located near the optic nerve or fovea. Treatment with light-activated AU-011 (belzupacap sarotalocan), an investigational drug which specifically targets tumor cells, may avoid these complications. We evaluated outcomes in a historical group of patients who fit eligibility criteria for AU-011 therapy and were treated with PBI. Methods: A consecutive series of patients who received PBI for small choroidal melanoma at a single center between 1986 and 2016 were identified. Consistent with eligibility criteria in clinical trials of AU-011, patients were included when tumor dimensions did not exceed 2.5 mm in maximum thickness and 10.0 mm in largest basal diameter (LBD). Snellen visual acuities were converted to logMAR for analysis. Visual acuity outcomes were analyzed in patients with an initial acuity of logMAR 0.7 or better (equivalent to Snellen 20/100). Rates of visual acuity loss and mortality were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Acuity loss by tumor location was compared using log-rank testing. Rates of tumor recurrence, neovascular glaucoma (NVG), and eye loss were also described. Results: Two hundred and 22 patients were included in the study. The median age was 60.7 years (range 21.3–94.8 years). Median tumor thickness was 2.0 mm (range 1.2–2.5 mm), and median LBD was 8.0 mm (range 4.0–10.0 mm). Median follow-up was 6.9 years (range 1.0–30.2 years). In 204 patients with a baseline logMAR visual acuity of 0.7 or better, the mean baseline acuity was 0.15 (equivalent to Snellen 20/25), which decreased to 0.52 (approximately Snellen 20/70) by 5 years after PBI. Visual outcomes were significantly worse for patients with tumors located within 3 mm of the optic disc and/or fovea. Tumor recurrence (1.4%), NVG (4.5%), and eye loss (2.7%) were uncommon. Discussion: Despite the advantageous dose distribution of protons, over half of patients with small choroidal melanomas located near the optic disc or fovea had a visual acuity equivalent to 20/80 or worse at 5 years after PBI. Treatment with AU-011 may allow better vision preservation in small tumors that carry a high risk of vision loss with radiotherapy.

Journal Section:
Research Article
Keywords:
Choroidal melanoma, Radiation, Oncology
1.
Gragoudas ES, Seddon JM, Egan K, Glynn R, Munzenrider J, Austin-Seymour M, et al. Long-term results of proton beam irradiated uveal melanomas. Ophthalmology. 1987 Apr;94(4):349–53.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33456-6
2.
Reichstein DA, Brock AL. Radiation therapy for uveal melanoma: a review of treatment methods available in 2021. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2021 May 1;32(3):183–90.
https://doi.org/10.1097/ICU.0000000000000761
3.
Jampol LM, Moy CS, Murray TG, Reynolds SM, Albert DM, Schachat AP, et al. The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: IV. Local treatment failure and enucleation in the first 5 years after brachytherapy. COMS report No. 19. Ophthalmology. 2020 Apr;127(4S):S148–57.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.01.032
4.
Aziz HA, Singh N, Bena J, Wilkinson A, Singh AD. Vision loss following episcleral brachytherapy for uveal melanoma: development of a vision prognostication tool. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Jun 1;134(6):615–20.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.0104
5.
Finger PT, Chin KJ, Yu GP; Palladium-103 for Choroidal Melanoma Study Group. Risk factors for radiation maculopathy after ophthalmic plaque radiation for choroidal melanoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2010 Apr;149(4):608–15.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2009.11.006
6.
Seddon JM, Gragoudas ES, Polivogianis L, Hsieh CC, Egan KM, Goitein M, et al. Visual outcome after proton beam irradiation of uveal melanoma. Ophthalmology. 1986 May;93(5):666–74.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(86)33700-x
7.
Seddon JM, Gragoudas ES, Egan KM, Glynn RJ, Munzenrider JE, Austin-Seymour M, et al. Uveal melanomas near the optic disc or fovea. Visual results after proton beam irradiation. Ophthalmology. 1987 Apr;94(4):354–61.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(87)33439-6
8.
Kines RC, Varsavsky I, Choudhary S, Bhattacharya D, Spring S, McLaughlin R, et al. An infrared dye-conjugated virus-like particle for the treatment of primary uveal melanoma. Mol Cancer Ther. 2018 Feb;17(2):565–74.
https://doi.org/10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-17-0953
9.
Kim IK; On Behalf of the AU-011 Investigator Group. A phase 2 trial of belzupacap sarotalocan (AU-011) A first-in-class targeted therapy for choroidal melanoma via suprachoroidal administration. Aura Biosciences. Investor Day; 2022 Oct 3. https://ir.aurabiosciences.com/static-files/c2ab5de2-53b2-469e-be4b-557abf1cac68.
10.
Goitein M, Miller T. Planning proton therapy of the eye. Med Phys. 1983 Jun;10(3):275–83.
https://doi.org/10.1118/1.595258
11.
Lane AM, Oxenreiter MM, Hashmi M, Aronow ME, Trofimov AV, Shih HA, et al. A comparison of treatment outcomes after standard dose (70 Gy) versus reduced dose (50 Gy) proton radiation in patients with uveal melanoma. Ophthalmol Retina. 2022 May 16;6(11):1089–97.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oret.2022.05.006
12.
Gragoudas ES, Li W, Lane AM, Munzenrider J, Egan KM. Risk factors for radiation maculopathy and papillopathy after intraocular irradiation. Ophthalmology. 1999 Aug;106(8):1571–7; discussion 1577-1578.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0161-6420(99)90455-4
13.
Melia BM, Abramson DH, Albert DM, Boldt HC, Earle JD, Hanson WF, et al. Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS) randomized trial of I-125 brachytherapy for medium choroidal melanoma. I. Visual acuity after 3 years COMS report no. 16. Ophthalmology. 2001 Feb;108(2):348–66.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00526-1
14.
Mortality in patients with small choroidal melanoma. COMS report no. 4. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group. Arch Ophthalmol. 1997 Jul;115(7):886–93.
15.
Shields CL, Sioufi K, Srinivasan A, Di Nicola M, Masoomian B, Barna LE, et al. Visual outcome and millimeter incremental risk of metastasis in 1780 patients with small choroidal melanoma managed by plaque radiotherapy. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Dec 1;136(12):1325–33.
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3881
16.
Aaberg TM, Bergstrom CS, Hickner ZJ, Lynn MJ. Long-term results of primary transpupillary thermal therapy for the treatment of choroidal malignant melanoma. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008 Jun;92(6):741–6.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2007.132951
17.
Shields JA, Glazer LC, Mieler WF, Shields CL, Gottlieb MS. Comparison of xenon arc and argon laser photocoagulation in the treatment of choroidal melanomas. Am J Ophthalmol. 1990 Jun 15;109(6):647–55.
https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72432-8
18.
Win PH, Robertson DM, Buettner H, McCannel CA, Bennett SR. Extended follow-up of small melanocytic choroidal tumors treated with transpupillary thermotherapy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2006 Apr;124(4):503–6.
https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.124.4.503
© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
2023
You do not currently have access to this content.