Background: Uveal melanoma and its treatment can influence the physical and psychological well-being of patients in a way that differs from other cancers. Factors influencing quality of life (QOL) include visual impairment, changes in appearance, day-to-day functioning, ocular discomfort, and worry regarding disease recurrence. Objective: We aimed to study both general and disease-specific QOL in uveal melanoma patients in Ireland and compare QOL between a plaque radiotherapy group and an enucleation treatment group. This information was sought to enhance our understanding of QOL issues for uveal melanoma patients, in the context of improving care and providing appropriate psychosocial support. Method: The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OPT30 were completed by patients with uveal melanoma treated by enucleation or brachytherapy. Results: 138 of 206 patients completed the questionnaires. There was no significant difference in QOL scores between treatment groups. Thirty-two percent of patients reported concerns about tumour recurrence elsewhere in the body. The brachytherapy group had a significantly higher “role functioning” score (p = 0.030). Enucleation patients were more likely to have problems with appearance (p < 0.0005). Younger patients (12–54 years of age) were more likely to report headaches (p < 0.0005) and problems with reading (p = 0.042), and they had a lower cognitive functioning score (p = 0.003) than those aged ≥55 years. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in reported QOL between treatment groups. Our data identified a number of vulnerable patient subgroups. By anticipating which patients are more likely to suffer in terms of certain aspects of their QOL, we are better able to provide appropriate and timely psychosocial support.

1.
Rao
YJ
,
Sein
J
,
Badiyan
S
,
Schwarz
JK
,
DeWees
T
,
Grigsby
P
, et al.
Patterns of care and survival outcomes after treatment for uveal melanoma in the post-coms era (2004-2013): a surveillance, epidemiology, and end results analysis
.
J Contemp Brachytherapy
.
2017
Oct
;
9
(
5
):
453
65
.
[PubMed]
1689-832X
2.
Hawkins
BS
.
Collaborative ocular melanoma study randomized trial of I-125 brachytherapy
.
Clin Trials
.
2011
Oct
;
8
(
5
):
661
73
.
[PubMed]
1740-7745
3.
Jampol
LM
,
Moy
CS
,
Murray
TG
,
Reynolds
SM
,
Albert
DM
,
Schachat
AP
, et al.;
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group (COMS Group)
.
The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: IV. Local treatment failure and enucleation in the first 5 years after brachytherapy. COMS report no. 19
.
Ophthalmology
.
2002
Dec
;
109
(
12
):
2197
206
.
[PubMed]
0161-6420
4.
Mahendraraj
K
,
Lau
CS
,
Lee
I
,
Chamberlain
RS
.
Trends in incidence, survival, and management of uveal melanoma: a population-based study of 7,516 patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1973-2012)
.
Clin Ophthalmol
.
2016
Oct
;
10
:
2113
9
.
[PubMed]
1177-5467
5.
Virgili
G
,
Gatta
G
,
Ciccolallo
L
,
Capocaccia
R
,
Biggeri
A
,
Crocetti
E
, et al.;
EUROCARE Working Group
.
Survival in patients with uveal melanoma in Europe
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
2008
Oct
;
126
(
10
):
1413
8
.
[PubMed]
0003-9950
6.
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study Group
.
The COMS randomized trial of iodine 125 brachytherapy for choroidal melanoma: V. Twelve-year mortality rates and prognostic factors: COMS report No. 28
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
2006
Dec
;
124
(
12
):
1684
93
.
[PubMed]
0003-9950
7.
Damato
B
,
Hope-Stone
L
,
Cooper
B
,
Brown
SL
,
Salmon
P
,
Heimann
H
, et al.
Patient-reported Outcomes and Quality of Life After Treatment of Choroidal Melanoma: A Comparison of Enucleation Versus Radiotherapy in 1596 Patients
.
Am J Ophthalmol
.
2018
Sep
;
193
:
230
51
.
[PubMed]
0002-9394
8.
Baily
C
,
O’Neill
V
,
Dunne
M
,
Cunningham
M
,
Gullo
G
,
Kennedy
S
, et al.
Uveal Melanoma in Ireland
.
Ocul Oncol Pathol
.
2019
Apr
;
5
(
3
):
195
204
.
[PubMed]
2296-4681
9.
Aaronson
NK
,
Ahmedzai
S
,
Bergman
B
,
Bullinger
M
,
Cull
A
,
Duez
NJ
, et al.
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology
.
J Natl Cancer Inst
.
1993
Mar
;
85
(
5
):
365
76
.
[PubMed]
0027-8874
10.
EORTC Quality of Life Study Group
.
EORTC QLQ C30 Scoring Manual
.
Brussels
:
EORTC Data Centre
;
1995
.
11.
Giesinger
JM
,
Kieffer
JM
,
Fayers
PM
,
Groenvold
M
,
Petersen
MA
,
Scott
NW
, et al.;
EORTC Quality of Life Group
.
Replication and validation of higher order models demonstrated that a summary score for the EORTC QLQ-C30 is robust
.
J Clin Epidemiol
.
2016
Jan
;
69
:
79
88
.
[PubMed]
0895-4356
12.
Miniati
M
,
Fabrini
MG
,
Genovesi Ebert
F
,
Mancino
M
,
Maglio
A
,
Massimetti
G
, et al.
Quality of Life, Depression, and Anxiety in Patients with Uveal Melanoma: A Review
.
J Oncol
.
2018
Mar
;
2018
:
5253109
.
[PubMed]
1687-8450
13.
Frenkel
S
,
Rosenne
H
,
Briscoe
D
,
Hendler
K
,
Bereket
R
,
Molcho
M
, et al.
Long-term uveal melanoma survivors: measuring their quality of life
.
Acta Ophthalmol
.
2018
Jun
;
96
(
4
):
e421
6
.
[PubMed]
1755-375X
14.
Kopp
BC
,
Crump
RT
,
Weis
E
.
The use of semistructured interviews to assess quality of life impacts for patients with uveal melanoma
.
Can J Ophthalmol
.
2017
Apr
;
52
(
2
):
181
5
.
[PubMed]
0008-4182
15.
Cruickshanks
KJ
,
Fryback
DG
,
Nondahl
DM
,
Robinson
N
,
Keesey
U
,
Dalton
DS
, et al.
Treatment choice and quality of life in patients with choroidal melanoma
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
1999
Apr
;
117
(
4
):
461
7
.
[PubMed]
0003-9950
16.
Melia
M
,
Moy
CS
,
Reynolds
SM
,
Hayman
JA
,
Murray
TG
,
Hovland
KR
, et al.;
Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study-Quality of Life Study Group
.
Quality of life after iodine 125 brachytherapy vs enucleation for choroidal melanoma: 5-year results from the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study: COMS QOLS Report No. 3
.
Arch Ophthalmol
.
2006
Feb
;
124
(
2
):
226
38
.
[PubMed]
0003-9950
17.
Hope-Stone
L
,
Brown
SL
,
Heimann
H
,
Damato
B
,
Salmon
P
.
Two-year patient-reported outcomes following treatment of uveal melanoma
.
Eye (Lond)
.
2016
Dec
;
30
(
12
):
1598
605
.
[PubMed]
0950-222X
18.
Nolte
S
,
Liegl
G
,
Petersen
MA
,
Aaronson
NK
,
Costantini
A
,
Fayers
PM
, et al.;
EORTC Quality of Life Group
.
General population normative data for the EORTC QLQ-C30 health-related quality of life questionnaire based on 15,386 persons across 13 European countries, Canada and the Unites States
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2019
Jan
;
107
:
153
63
.
[PubMed]
0959-8049
19.
Brandberg
Y
,
Kock
E
,
Oskar
K
,
af Trampe
E
,
Seregard
S
.
Psychological reactions and quality of life in patients with posterior uveal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque therapy or enucleation: a one year follow-up study
.
Eye (Lond)
.
2000
Dec
;
14
(
Pt 6
):
839
46
.
[PubMed]
0950-222X
20.
Idler
E
,
Cartwright
K
.
What Do We Rate When We Rate Our Health? Decomposing Age-related Contributions to Self-rated Health
.
J Health Soc Behav
.
2018
Mar
;
59
(
1
):
74
93
.
[PubMed]
0022-1465
21.
Risendal
BC
,
Dwyer
A
,
Seidel
RW
,
Lorig
K
,
Coombs
L
,
Ory
MG
.
Meeting the challenge of cancer survivorship in public health: results from the evaluation of the chronic disease self-management program for cancer survivors
.
Front Public Health
.
2015
Apr
;
2
:
214
.
[PubMed]
2296-2565
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.