Background: Medulloepithelioma is a rare congenital neoplasm derived from precursors of the nonpigmented ciliary epithelium of the ciliary body. The average patient age at clinical presentation is 3.8 years. Case Presentation: We present the case of a 78-year-old male with progressive lens subluxation and ocular hypertension who was found to have a ciliary body mass. After enucleation for presumed ciliary body melanoma, histopathology showed a nonteratoid medulloepithelioma. Cytogenetic analysis revealed abnormalities in chromosomes 3 and 8. Conclusion: Medulloepithelioma is often initially misdiagnosed. Though congenital in nature, it can exhibit rapid growth, have chromosomal abnormalities, and must be considered in all age groups.

1.
Verhoeff FH: A rare tumor arising from the pars ciliaris retinae (terato-neuroma) of a nature hitherto unrecognized, and its relation to the so-called glioma-retinae. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1904;10:351-377.
2.
Fuchs E: Wucherungen und Geschwulste des Ciliarepithels. Albrecht Von Graefes Arch Ophthalmol 1908;68:534-587.
3.
Grinker RR: Gliomas of the retina, including the results of studies with silver impregnations. Arch Ophthalmol 1931;5:920-935.
4.
Zimmerman LE: Verhoeff's ‘terato-neuroma'. A critical reappraisal in light of new observations and current concepts of embryonic tumors. The Fourth Frederick H. Verhoeff Lecture. Am J Ophthalmol 1971;72:1039-1057.
5.
Broughton WL, Zimmerman LE: A clinicopathologic study of 56 cases of intraocular medulloepitheliomas. Am J Ophthalmol 1978;85:407-418.
6.
Sisley K, Rennie IG, Parsons MA, Jacques R, Hammond DW, Bell SM, Potter AM, Rees RC: Abnormalities of chromosomes 3 and 8 in posterior uveal melanoma correlate with prognosis. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 1997;19:22-28.
7.
Ni A, Wu MJ, Chavala SH: Sphere formation permits Oct4 reprogramming of ciliary body epithelial cells into induced pluripotent stem cells. Stem Cells Dev 2014;23:3065-3071.
8.
Willis RA: The embryonic tumors and teratomas; in The Borderland of Embryology and Pathology, ed 2. London, Butterworth, 1962, pp 422-466.
9.
Sosińska-Mielcarek K, Senkus-Konefka E, Jaskiewicz K, Kordek R, Jassem J: Intraocular malignant teratoid medulloepithelioma in an adult: clinicopathological case report and review of the literature. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2006;84:259-262.
10.
Floyd BB, Minckler DS, Valentin L: Intraocular medulloepithelioma in a 79-year-old man. Ophthalmology 1982;89:1088-1094.
11.
Betts DR, Leibundgut KE, Niggli FK: Cytogenetic analysis in a case of intraocular medulloepithelioma. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 1996;92:144-146.
12.
Sahm F, Jakobiec FA, Meyer J, Schrimpf D, Eberhart CG, Hovestadt V, Capper D, Lambo S, Ryzhova M, Schüller U, Zheludkova O, Kumirova E, Lichter P, von Deimling A, Jones DT, Pfister SM, Kool M, Korshunov A: Somatic mutations of DICER1 and KMT2D are frequent in intraocular medulloepitheliomas. Genes Chromosomes Cancer 2016;55:418-427.
13.
Korshunov A, Jakobiec FA, Eberhart CG, Hovestadt V, Capper D, Jones DT, Sturm D, Stagner AM, Edward DP, Eagle RC, Proia AD, Koch A, Ryzhova M, Ektova A, Schüller U, Zheludkova O, Lichter P, von Deimling A, Pfister SM, Kool M: Comparative integrated molecular analysis of intraocular medulloepitheliomas and central nervous system embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes confirms that they are distinct nosologic entities. Neuropathology 2015;35:538-544.
14.
Babu N, Dey P: Medulloepithelioma of ciliary body diagnosed by fine needle aspiration cytology. Cytopathology 2003;14:93-94.
15.
Davidorf FH, Craig E, Birnbaum L, Wakely P Jr: Management of medulloepithelioma of the ciliary body with brachytherapy. Am J Ophthalmol 2002;133:841-843.
16.
Gupta A, Khetan V: Chemosensitivity of medulloepithelioma. Ophthalmology 2011;118:1488.
17.
Meel R, Chawla B, Mohanti BK, Kashyap S, Bakhshi S: Ocular medulloepithelioma chemosensitivity. Ophthalmology 2010;117:2440.e1-e2.
18.
Poon DS, Reich E, Smith VM, Kingston J, Reddy MA, Hungerford JL, Sagoo MS: Ruthenium-106 plaque brachytherapy in the primary management of ocular medulloepithelioma. Ophthalmology 2015;122:1949-1951.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.