Purpose: Aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate patterns of failure, results, and prognostic factors for patients with nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) following radiotherapy (RT) with and without concurrent chemotherapy (RCT). Patients and Methods: Between 1978 and 1999, a total of 101 patients with NPC were treated in our hospital, of whom 53 received external megavoltage RT alone with a median total dose of 76 Gy (1978–1988), and 48 patients had RCT (1989–1999). For RCT a combination of 5-FU and cisplatin was used together with a median total dose of 72 Gy. Patterns of relapse, survival rates and toxicity as well as prognostic factors were evaluated retrospectively. Results: RCT was associated with a marked reduction in distant metastases: 6/48 (13%) vs. 17/53 (32%) after RT alone. Locoregional tumor persistence was only marginally lower with RCT: 10/48 (21%) vs. 17/53 (32%) following RT. Patients with RCT demonstrated a survival advantage compared to those with RT alone (5-year overall survival (OS): 64% vs. 44%, p = 0.1). OS, disease-specific survival and locoregional control rates were 53, 57, and 78% at 5 years and 47, 51 and 78% at 10 years, respectively. OS was significantly affected by histology (p = 0.007), the patients’ age (p = 0.009) and gender (p = 0.01). Conclusion: This retrospective study provides further evidence that both reduction of distant metastasis and enhanced local tumor control by combined radiochemotherapy may be associated with improved survival rates in NPC compared to radiation alone. Concurrent RCT is therefore considered the preferable treatment option, however, confirmation in randomized trials is still warranted.

© 2003 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.