Background: Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck frequently spreads to regional lymph nodes in early stages. While radioimmunoimaging has progressed to a rather routine diagnostic procedure in melanoma and colorectal carcinoma, nuclear medicine imaging in head and neck cancer previously was confined to nonspecific agents or cross-reacting monoclonal antibodies primarily raised against other tumor entities. However, the ideal radioimmunoagent is directed against tumor-associated epitopes of the cancer in question and is labeled with a radionuclide combining high image quality with low radiation burden to the patient. Patients and Methods: Five patients with primary pharyngeal carcinoma metastatic to ipsilateral and in two patients also to contralateral lymph nodes were investigated using a new technetium-99m-labeled monoclonal antibody (MoAb 174, TruScint SQTM) directed against cytoskeletal proteins of squamous cell carcinoma. All patients had their tumors surgically resected, and a final diagnosis was established. Patients also were monitored for toxicity, induction of anti-mouse antibodies (HAMA), and serum concentrations of different tumor markers. Results: No toxicity was observed. Primary tumors were correctly identified in 5/5, ipsilateral jugular lymph node metastases in 4/5, and deeper cervical metastases in 1/1 patients. Image interpretation was complicated because of nonspecific radioactivity in the nasal mucosa and in major vessels. False-positive results were found in contralateral jugular lymph nodes, the maxillary sinus mucosa and in one gleno-humeral joint. HAMA concentrations did not rise in any patient, while the concentrations of the tumor markers SCC and CYFRA-21-1 were not significantly different after surgery. Conclusions: In our opinion, radioimmunoimaging by means of technetium-99m-labeled anti-squamous carcinoma antibodies represents a major progress in functional diagnostic oncology. It aims at the evaluation of tumor metabolism, tissue vitality, and cellular antigenic patterns, in contrast to former less specific (and partly associated with a higher radiation burden) nuclear medicine imaging modalities, which are based on size criteria such as clinical examination, magnetic resonance imaging and other morphological investigations.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.