Background: Timely sharing of electronic health records across providers, while ensuring data security and privacy, is essential for prompt care of cancer patients, as well as for the development of medical research and the enhancement of personalized medicine. Yet, it is not trivial to achieve efficient consent management, data exchange, and access-control policy enforcement, in particular, in decentralized settings, and given the gravity of the condition such as cancer. Using blockchain technology (BCT) has been recently advocated by research communities and gained momentum from the industry perspective. However, most of the proposed solutions are at the level of a prototype, and blockchain-based healthcare data management systems are not in place yet. Summary: This paper presents a systematic literature review, aiming to analyze the motivations, advantages, and limitations, as well as barriers and future challenges faced when applying the state-of-the-art distributed ledger technology in oncology. We then discuss its outcomes and propose the direction of the future research that can help to attain integration and adoption of the BCT for data-sharing, medical research, and the pharmaceutical supply chain in oncology, as well as in healthcare in general. Key Messages: BCT has the potential to enhance data-sharing (for primary care and medical research), as well as to attain optimization of the pharmaceutical supply chain by bringing properties such as transparency, traceability, and immutability to the applications. However, BCT itself cannot guarantee data privacy and security. Thus, it is never proposed as a stand-alone technology, but as a combined technology with cryptographic techniques. Regardless of the number of existing prototypes of blockchain-based healthcare systems, due to the existing barriers of the adoption (e.g., legal, social, and technological limitations), there is a lack of evaluation in real-world settings. Aiming to overcome these limitations, we propose future research directions that include design of the privacy-preserving hybrid data storage, interoperable infrastructures and architecture, and are compliant with the international laws and regulations.

1.
Rajkomar
A
,
Oren
E
,
Chen
K
,
Dai
AM
,
Hajaj
N
,
Hardt
M
, et al.
Scalable and accurate deep learning with electronic health records
.
NPJ Digit Med
.
2018
May
;
1
(
1
):
18
.
[PubMed]
2398-6352
2.
Dubovitskaya
A
,
Xu
Z
,
Ryu
S
,
Schumacher
M
,
Wang
F
.
Secure and trustable electronic medical records sharing using blockchain.
InAMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings 2017 (Vol.
2017
, p. 650). American Medical Informatics Association.
3.
Mettler
M
. Blockchain technology in healthcare: The revolution starts here. In2016 IEEE 18th International Conference on e-Health Networking, Applications and Services (Healthcom)
2016
Sep 14 (pp. 1-3). IEEE.
4.
Zhang
P
,
White
J
,
Schmidt
DC
,
Lenz
G
,
Rosenbloom
ST
.
Fhirchain: applying blockchain to securely and scalably share clinical data
.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J
.
2018
Jul
;
16
:
267
78
.
[PubMed]
2001-0370
5.
Mamoshina
P
,
Ojomoko
L
,
Yanovich
Y
,
Ostrovski
A
,
Botezatu
A
,
Prikhodko
P
, et al.
Converging blockchain and next-generation artificial intelligence technologies to decentralize and accelerate biomedical research and healthcare
.
Oncotarget
.
2017
Nov
;
9
(
5
):
5665
90
.
[PubMed]
1949-2553
6.
Hussein
AF
,
ArunKumar
N
,
Ramirez-Gonzalez
G
,
Abdulhay
E
,
Tavares
JM
,
de Albuquerque
VH
.
ArunKumar N, Ramirez-Gonzalez G, Abdulhay E, Tavares JM, de Albuquerque VH. ArunKumar N, Ramirez-Gonzalez G, Abdulhay E, Tavares JM, de Albuquerque VH. A medical records managing and securing blockchain based system supported by a genetic algorithm and discrete wavelet transform
.
Cogn Syst Res
.
2018
Dec
;
52
:
1
1
. 1389-0417
7.
Schöner
MM
,
Kourouklis
D
,
Sandner
P
,
Gonzalez
E
,
Förster
J
.
Blockchain technology in the pharmaceutical industry.
Frankfurt, Germany: Frankfurt School Blockchain Center.
2017
Jul.
8.
Shae
Z
,
Tsai
J
.
Transform blockchain into distributed parallel computing architecture for precision medicine.
In2018 IEEE 38th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems (ICDCS)
2018
Jul 2 (pp. 1290-1299). IEEE.
9.
Kurtulmus
AB
,
Daniel
K
. Trustless machine learning contracts; evaluating and exchanging machine learning models on the ethereum blockchain. arXiv preprint arXiv:
1802
.10185. 2018 Feb 27.
10.
Angeletti
F
,
Chatzigiannakis
I
,
Vitaletti
A
.
The role of blockchain and IoT in recruiting participants for digital clinical trials.
In2017 25th International Conference on Software, Telecommunications and Computer Networks (SoftCOM)
2017
Sep 21 (pp. 1-5). IEEE.
11.
Peters
AW
,
Till
BM
,
Meara
JG
,
Afshar
S
.
Blockchain technology in health care: A primer for surgeons
.
Bull Am Coll Surg
.
2017
;
12
:
1
5
.0002-8045
12.
Haq
I
,
Esuka
OM
.
Blockchain Technology in Pharmaceutical Industry to Prevent Counterfeit Drugs
.
Int J Comput Appl
.
2018
;
975
:
8887
.1206-212X
13.
Hackius
N
,
Petersen
M
.
Blockchain in logistics and supply chain: trick or treat?
In
Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL)
.
2017
(pp.
3
-
18
). epubli.
14.
Azaria
A
,
Ekblaw
A
,
Vieira
T
,
Lippman
A
. Medrec: Using blockchain for medical data access and permission management. In2016 2nd International Conference on Open and Big Data (OBD)
2016
Aug 22 (pp. 25-30). IEEE.
15.
Dillenberger
D
,
Novotny
P
,
Zhang
Q
,
Jayachandran
P
,
Gupta
H
,
Mehta
S
, et al.
Blockchain Analytics and Artificial Intelligence
.
IBM J Res Develop
.
2019
Feb
;
63
(
2/3
):
5:1
5:14
. 0018-8646
16.
Nakamoto
S.
Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
17.
Pass
R
,
Shi
E
. Hybrid consensus: Efficient consensus in the permissionless model. In31st International Symposium on Distributed Computing (DISC 2017)
2017
. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.
18.
Ethereum Homestead Documentation [Cited 2019 April 29]. Available from: http://www.ethdocs.org/en/latest/
19.
Swanson
T.
Consensus-as-a-service: a brief report on the emergence of permissioned, distributed ledger systems.
Report, available online, Apr.
2015
Apr.
20.
Cachin
C
,
Vukolić
M
. Blockchain consensus protocols in the wild. arXiv preprint arXiv:
1707
.01873. 2017 Jul 6.
21.
Calvaresi
D
,
Cesarini
D
,
Sernani
P
,
Marinoni
M
,
Dragoni
AF
,
Sturm
A
.
Exploring the ambient assisted living domain: a systematic review
.
J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput
.
2017
Apr
;
8
(
2
):
239
57
. 1868-5137
22.
Kitchenham
BA
,
Brereton
P
,
Turner
M
,
Niazi
MK
,
Linkman
S
,
Pretorius
R
, et al.
Refining the systematic literature review process—two participant-observer case studies
.
Empir Softw Eng
.
2010
Dec
;
15
(
6
):
618
53
. 1382-3256
23.
Calvaresi
D
,
Dubovitskaya
A
,
Calbimonte
JP
,
Taveter
K
,
Schumacher
M
. Multi-agent systems and blockchain: Results from a systematic literature review. InInternational Conference on Practical Applications of Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
2018
Jun 20 (pp. 110-126). Springer, Cham.
24.
Calvaresi
D
,
Leis
M
,
Dubovitskaya
A
,
Schegg
R
,
Schumacher
M
.
Trust in Tourism via Blockchain Technology: Results from a Systematic Review. InInformation and Communication Technologies in Tourism 2019
.
Cham
:
Springer
;
2019
. pp.
304
17
.
25.
Yue
X
,
Wang
H
,
Jin
D
,
Li
M
,
Jiang
W
.
Healthcare data gateways: found healthcare intelligence on blockchain with novel privacy risk control
.
J Med Syst
.
2016
Oct
;
40
(
10
):
218
.
[PubMed]
0148-5598
26.
Ricke
J
,
Bartelink
H
.
Telemedicine and its impact on cancer management
.
Eur J Cancer
.
2000
May
;
36
(
7
):
826
33
.
[PubMed]
0959-8049
27.
Marshall
CL
,
Petersen
NJ
,
Naik
AD
,
Vander Velde
N
,
Artinyan
A
,
Albo
D
, et al.
Implementation of a regional virtual tumor board: a prospective study evaluating feasibility and provider acceptance
.
Telemed J E Health
.
2014
Aug
;
20
(
8
):
705
11
.
[PubMed]
1530-5627
28.
(ONC) OotNCfHIT
. 21st Century Cures Act: Interoperability, Information Blocking, and the ONC Health IT Certification Program
2019
[cited 2019 April 15]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/laws-regulation-and-policy/notice-proposed-rulemaking-improve-interoperability-health
29.
Draft Trusted Exchange Framework
.
2018
[cited 2019 April 15]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/sites/default/files/draft-trusted-exchange-framework.pdf
30.
Wang
Z
,
Jensen
MA
,
Zenklusen
JC
.
A practical guide to the cancer genome atlas (TCGA). InStatistical Genomics
.
New York (NY)
:
Humana Press
;
2016
. pp.
111
41
.
31.
Gaur
N
,
Desrosiers
L
,
Ramakrishna
V
,
Novotny
P
,
Baset
S
,
O’Dowd
A.
Hands-on Blockchain with Hyperledger: Building Decentralized Applications with Hyperledger Fabric and Composer. Packt Publishing Ltd;
2018
Jun 21.
32.
Weng
J
,
Weng
J
,
Zhang
J
,
Li
M
,
Zhang
Y
,
Luo
W.
Deepchain: Auditable and privacy-preserving deep learning with blockchain-based incentive. Cryptology ePrint Archive, Report 2018/679.
2018
.
33.
Yanovich
Y
,
Ivashchenko
I
,
Ostrovsky
A
,
Shevchenko
A
,
Sidorov
A
. Exonum: Byzantine fault tolerant protocol for blockchain [cited 2019 April 15]. Available from: https://exonum.com/
34.
Kamau
G
,
Boore
C
,
Maina
E
,
Njenga
S.
Blockchain Technology: Is this the Solution to EMR Interoperability and Security Issues in Developing Countries?. In2018 IST-Africa Week Conference (IST-Africa)
2018
May 9 (pp. Page-1). IEEE.
35.
Ozercan
HI
,
Ileri
AM
,
Ayday
E
,
Alkan
C
.
Realizing the potential of blockchain technologies in genomics
.
Genome Res
.
2018
Sep
;
28
(
9
):
1255
63
.
[PubMed]
1088-9051
36.
Salah
K
,
Rehman
MH
,
Nizamuddin
N
,
Al-Fuqaha
A
.
Blockchain for AI: review and open research challenges
.
IEEE Access
.
2019
;
7
:
10127
49
. 2169-3536
37.
Chen
Y
,
Ding
S
,
Xu
Z
,
Zheng
H
,
Yang
S
.
Blockchain-based medical records secure storage and medical service framework
.
J Med Syst
.
2018
Nov
;
43
(
1
):
5
.
[PubMed]
0148-5598
38.
Park
YR
,
Lee
E
,
Na
W
,
Park
S
,
Lee
Y
,
Lee
JH
.
Is Blockchain Technology Suitable for Managing Personal Health Records? Mixed-Methods Study to Test Feasibility
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2019
Feb
;
21
(
2
):
e12533
.
[PubMed]
1438-8871
39.
Mohsin
AH
,
Zaidan
AA
,
Zaidan
BB
,
Albahri
OS
,
Albahri
AS
,
Alsalem
MA
, et al.
Blockchain authentication of network applications: Taxonomy, classification, capabilities, open challenges, motivations, recommendations and future directions
.
Comput Stand Interfaces
.
2018
Dec
.0920-5489
40.
Vazirani
AA
,
O’Donoghue
O
,
Brindley
D
,
Meinert
E
.
Implementing Blockchains for Efficient Health Care: systematic Review
.
J Med Internet Res
.
2019
Feb
;
21
(
2
):
e12439
.
[PubMed]
1438-8871
41.
Kuo
TT
,
Zavaleta Rojas
H
,
Ohno-Machado
L
.
Comparison of blockchain platforms: a systematic review and healthcare examples
.
J Am Med Inform Assoc
.
2019
May
;
26
(
5
):
462
78
.
[PubMed]
1067-5027
42.
Korpela
K
,
Hallikas
J
,
Dahlberg
T
.
Digital supply chain transformation toward blockchain integration.
Inproceedings of the 50th Hawaii international conference on system sciences
2017
Jan 4.
43.
Dubovitskaya
A
,
Xu
Z
,
Ryu
S
,
Schumacher
M
,
Wang
F
. How blockchain could empower ehealth: An application for radiation oncology. InVLDB Workshop on Data Management and Analytics for Medicine and Healthcare
2017
Sep 1 (pp. 3-6). Springer, Cham.
44.
Directive (EU)
2016
/680 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data by competent authorities for the purposes of the prevention, investigation, detection or prosecution of criminal offences or the execution of criminal penalties, and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Council Framework Decision 2008/977/JHA [cited 2019 April 15]. Available from: http://data.europa.eu/eli/dir/2016/680/oj
45.
Health Information Privacy U.S. Department of Health & Human Services [cited 2019 April 15]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/
46.
Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement [cited 2019 October 10]. Available from: https://www.healthit.gov/topic/interoperability/trusted-exchange-framework-and-common-agreement
47.
IHE IT Infrastructure Technical Framework Supplement
. Document Encryption (DEN) [cited 2019 October 10]. Available from: http://www.ihe.net/uploadedFiles/Documents/ITI/IHE_ITI_Suppl_DEN.pdf
48.
Buldas
A
,
Kroonmaa
A
,
Laanoja
R
. Keyless signatures’ infrastructure: how to build global distributed hash-trees. InNordic Conference on Secure IT Systems
2013
Oct 18 (pp. 313-320). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
49.
Hardjono
T
,
Lipton
A
,
Pentland
A
. Towards a Design Philosophy for Interoperable Blockchain Systems, arXiv:1805.05934 [cs.CR], May
2018
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.