Background: The CA 19-9 decline 8 weeks after gemcitabine administration has been shown to be a useful prognosticator of survival in patients with pancreatic cancer. We assessed the prognostic value of changes in CA 19-9 levels 4 weeks after treatment initiation on overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Methods: We evaluated 72 patients who received gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. The serum CA 19-9 level was measured routinely at baseline (CA 19-9_Pre) and after the first (4 weeks; CA 19-9_A1) and second (8 weeks; CA 19-9_A2) courses. CA 19-9 responses were categorized into quartiles using the proportional change in CA 19-9. Results: The rates of decrease in CA 19-9_A1 and CA 19-9_A2 were strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.8981, p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that an early CA 19-9 response was prognostic of OS and TTP in addition to CA 19-9_Pre and performance status. Compared with the first quartile of an early CA 19-9 response, hazard ratios for the second, third and fourth quartiles were 0.91 (95% confidence interval, CI, 0.59–1.34), 0.71 (95% CI, 0.45–1.08), and 0.63 (95% CI, 0.41–0.94) for TTP, respectively (p for trend = 0.002), and 0.98 (95% CI, 0.61–1.49), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.40–1.08) and 0.79 (95% CI, 0.50–1.21) for OS (p for trend = 0.036). Conclusion: CA 19-9 response after the first course of gemcitabine was a prognosticator of OS and TTP in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

1.
Casper ES, Green MR, Kelsen DP, Heelan RT, Brown TD, Flombaum CD, Trochanowski B, Tarassoff PG: Phase II trial of gemcitabine (2,2′-difluorodeoxycytidine) in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Invest New Drugs 1994;12:29–34.
2.
Carmichael J, Fink U, Russell RC, Spittle MF, Harris AL, Spiessi G, Blatter J: Phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 1996;73:101–105.
3.
Burris HA 3rd, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, Rothenberg ML, Modiano MR, Cripps MC, Portenoy RK, Storniolo AM, Tarassoff P, Nelson R, Dorr FA, Stephens CD, Von Hoff DD: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced pancreas cancer: a randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2403–2413.
4.
Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47:207–214.
5.
Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, Verweij J, Van Glabbeke M, van Oosterom AT, Christian MC, Gwyther SG: New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;92:205–216.
6.
Warshaw AL, Fernandez-del Castillo C: Pancreatic carcinoma. N Engl J Med 1992;326:455–465.
7.
Rothenberg ML, Abbruzzese JL, Moore M, Portenoy RK, Robertson JM, Wanebo HJ: A rationale for expanding the endpoints for clinical trials in advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 1996;78:627–632.
8.
Safi F, Schlosser W, Kolb G, Beger HG: Diagnostic value of CA 19-9 in patients with pancreatic cancer and nonspecific gastrointestinal symptoms. J Gastrointest Surg 1997;1:106–112.
9.
Lundin J, Roberts PJ, Kuusela P, Haglund C: The prognostic value of preoperative serum levels of CA 19-9 and CEA in patients with pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 1994;69:515–519.
10.
Ferrone CR, Finkelstein DM, Thayer SP, Muzikansky A, Fernandez-delCastillo C, Warshaw AL: Perioperative CA19-9 levels can predict stage and survival in patients with resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006;24:2897–2902.
11.
Katz A, Hanlon A, Lanciano R, Hoffman J, Coia L: Prognostic value of CA 19-9 levels in patients with carcinoma of the pancreas treated with radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1998;41:393–396.
12.
Okusaka T, Okada S, Sato T, Wakasugi H, Saisho H, Furuse J, Ishikawa O, Matsuno S, Yokoyama S: Tumor markers in evaluating the response to radiotherapy in unresectable pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1998;45:867–872.
13.
Micke O, Bruns F, Kurowski R, Horst E, deVries AF, Hausler JW, Willich N, Schäfer U: Predictive value of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 in pancreatic cancer treated with radiochemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003;57:90–97.
14.
Ishii H, Okada S, Sato T, Wakasugi H, Saisho H, Furuse J, Ishikawa O, Matsuno S, Yokoyama S: CA 19-9 in evaluating the response to chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic cancer. Hepatogastroenterology 1997;44:279–283.
15.
Gogas H, Lofts FJ, Evans TR, Daryanani S, Mansi JL: Are serial measurements of CA19-9 useful in predicting response to chemotherapy in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas? Br J Cancer 1998;77:325–328.
16.
Halm U, Schumann T, Schiefke I, Witzigmann H, Mossner J, Keim V: Decrease of CA 19-9 during chemotherapy with gemcitabine predicts survival time in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2000;82:1013–1016.
17.
Saad ED, Machado MC, Wajsbrot D, Abramoff R, Hoff PM, Tabacof J, Katz A, Simon SD, Gansl RC: Pretreatment CA 19-9 level as a prognostic factor in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine. Int J Gastrointest Cancer 2002;32:35–41.
18.
Ziske C, Schlie C, Gorschluter M, Glasmacher A, Mey U, Strehl J, Sauerbruch T, Schmidt-Wolf IG: Prognostic value of CA 19-9 levels in patients with inoperable adenocarcinoma of the pancreas treated with gemcitabine. Br J Cancer 2003;89:1413–1417.
19.
Sawaki A, Katsurahara M, Okubo K, Mizuno N, Nakamura T, Tajika M, Kawai H, Toyama T, Yamao K: Can decreasing the serum level of CA19-9 predict the survival benefit of gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer? J Clin Oncol (Meeting Abstracts) 2004;22 (suppl 14s):4208.
20.
Ko AH, Hwang J, Venook AP, Abbruzzese JL, Bergsland EK, Tempero MA: Serum CA19-9 response as a surrogate for clinical outcome in patients receiving fixed-dose rate gemcitabine for advanced pancreatic cancer. Br J Cancer 2005;93:195–199.
21.
Maisey NR, Norman AR, Hill A, Massey A, Oates J, Cunningham D: CA19-9 as a prognostic factor in inoperable pancreatic cancer: the implication for clinical trials. Br J Cancer 2005;93:740–743.
22.
Heinemann V, Schermuly MM, Stieber P, Schulz L, Jungst D, Wilkowski R, Schalhorn A: CA19-9: a pedictor of response in pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin. Anticancer Res 1999;19:2433–2435.
23.
Stemmler J, Stieber P, Szymala AM, Schalhorn A, Schermuly MM, Wilkowski R, Helmberger T, Lamerz R, Stoffregen C, Niebler K, Garbrecht M, Heinemann V: Are serial CA 19-9 kinetics helpful in predicting survival in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer treated with gemcitabine and cisplatin? Onkologie 2003;26:462–467.
24.
Tempero MA, Uchida E, Takasaki H, Burnett DA, Steplewski Z, Pour PM: Relationship of carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and Lewis antigens in pancreatic cancer. Cancer Res 1987;47:5501–5503.
25.
Buyse M, Piedbois P: On the relationship between response to treatment and survival time. Stat Med 1996;15:2797–2812.
26.
Ueno H, Okusaka T, Ikeda M, Takezako Y, Morizane C: An early phase II study of S-1 in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Oncology 2005;68:171–178.
27.
Mann DV, Edwards R, Ho S, Lau WY, Glazer G: Elevated tumour marker CA19-9: clinical interpretation and influence of obstructive jaundice. Eur J Surg Oncol 2000;26:474–479.
28.
Isayama H, Kawabe T, Nakai Y, Komatsu Y, Omata M: Covered metallic stents for the management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Dig Endosc 2004;16:S104–S106.
29.
Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Tsujino T, Yoshida H, Tada M, Shiratori Y, Kawabe T, Omata M: Polyurethane-covered metal stent for management of distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2002;55:366–370.
30.
Nakai Y, Isayama H, Komatsu Y, Tsujino T, Toda N, Sasahira N, Yamamoto N, Hirano K, Tada M, Yoshida H, Kawabe T, Omata M: Efficacy and safety of the covered Wallstent in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;62:742–748.
31.
Hess V, Glimelius B, Grawe P, Dietrich D, Bodoky G, Ruhstaller T, Bajetta E, Saletti P, Figer A, Scheithauer W, Herrmann R: CA 19-9 tumour-marker response to chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer enrolled in a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2008;9:132–138.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.