Purpose: To evaluate the impact of raltitrexed (Tomudex®) on the quality of life in a multicenter, phase II study in advanced pancreatic and biliary carcinomas. Patients and Methods: Forty-six patients with advanced, histologically proven pancreatic (n = 37, 80.4%) or biliary (n = 9, 19.6%) carcinoma received 3 mg/m2 raltitrexed intravenously once every 3 weeks. For the quality of life assessments, EORTC QLQ-C30 was used, and the evaluation of the clinical benefit was performed according to the 4 criteria of the clinical benefit response. All patients were assessed for safety, and 41 patients were evaluable for objective response. Results: Patients (63% male/37% female) had a mean age of 61.2 years, 71.7% had a PS of 0–1, 78.3% had metastatic disease, and 63% had at least 2 tumoral sites. A total of 176 cycles were administered with a mean of 4 cycles per patient (range 1–12). Three out of 43 patients evaluable for EORTC QLQ-C30 (7.0%; CI95% 1.4–19.0%) had a quality of life improvement. Thirty-two patients fulfilled the 4 criteria required to evaluate the clinical benefit response; 5 were responders (15.6%; CI95% 5.3–32.8%); 1 patient was a good responder based on both the EORTC questionnaire and the clinical benefit response. Forty-one patients were assessable for response, 3 responded to treatment (response rate: 6.5 %; CI95% 1.3–17.9%). Median survival was 4.6 months (CI95% 2.9–8.2 months), the 1-year survival rate was 21.8%. The most common grade 3–4 toxicities were neutropenia (8%), leukopenia (8%), thrombopenia (6%), anemia (6%), liver enzyme elevations (11%), asthenia (9%), vomiting (9%), abdominal pain (7%), and phlebitis (6%). One treatment-related death occurred (neutropenic sepsis). Conclusion: Raltitrexed appeared to be generally well tolerated and showed a clinical benefit response and/or quality of life improvement in a limited number of patients.

1.
Landis SH, Murray T, Bolden S, Wingo PA: Cancer Statistics 1999. CA Cancer J Clin 1999;49:8–31.
2.
Wanebo HJ, Vezeridis MP: Pancreatic carcinoma in perspective: A continuing challenge. Cancer 1996;78:580–591.
3.
Evans DB, Abbruzzese JL, Rich TR: Cancer of the pancreas; in De Vita VT Jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds): Cancer: Principles and Practice of Oncology ed 5. Philadelphia, Lippincott-Raven, 1997, pp 1054–1087.
4.
Gudjonsson B: Cancer of the pancreas. Cancer 1987;60:2284–2303.
5.
Falkson G, MacIntyre M, Moertel CG, et al: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group experience with chemotherapy for inoperable gallbladder and duct cancer. Cancer 1984;54:965–969.
6.
Taal BG, Audisio RA, Bleiberg H, et al: Phase II trial of mitomycin C (MMC) in advanced gallbladder and biliary tree carcinoma. An EORTC Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group Study. Ann Oncol 1993;4:607–609.
7.
Rougier P, Fandi A, Ducreux M, et al: Demonstrated efficiency of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion (CI) and cisplatin (P) in patients with advanced biliary tract carcinoma. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1995;14:A498.
8.
Papakostas P, Kouroussis C, Androulakis N, et al: First-line chemotherapy with docetaxel for unresectable or metastatic carcinoma of the biliary tract. A multicenter Phase II study. Eur J Cancer 2001;37:1833–1838.
9.
Chen JS, Lin YC, Jan YY, Liau CT: Mitomycin C with weekly 24-h infusion of high-dose 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin in patients with biliary tract and periampullar carcinomas. Anticancer Drugs 2001;12:339–343.
10.
Burris HA, Moore MJ, Andersen J, Green MR, et al: Improvements in survival and clinical benefit with Gemcitabine as first-line therapy for patients with advanced cancer: A randomized trial. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:2403–2413.
11.
Glimelius B, Hoffman K, Sjödén P-O, et al: Chemotherapy improves survival and quality of life in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer. Ann Oncol 1996;7:593–600.
12.
Jackman AL, Gibson W, Brown M, et al: The role of the reduced-folate carrier and metabolism to intracellular polyglutamates for the activity of ICI D 1694; in Rustum YM (ed): Novel Approaches to Selective Treatments of Human Solid Tumours: Laboratory and Clinical Correlation. New York, Plenum, 1993, pp 265–276.
13.
Zalcberg JR, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, et al: ZD1694: A novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor with substantial activity in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1996;14:716–721.
14.
Cunningham D: Mature results from three large controlled studies with raltitrexed (Tomudex). Br J Cancer 1998;77(suppl 2):15–21.
15.
Cunningham D, Zalcberg J, Maroun J, et al: Efficacy, tolerability and management of raltitrexed (Tomudex) monotherapy in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: A review of Phase II/III trials. Eur J Cancer 2002;38:478–486.
16.
Cunningham D, Zalcberg JR, Rath U, et al: Final results of a randomized trial comparing ‘‘Tomudex’’ (raltitrexed) with 5-fluorouracil plus leucovorin in advanced colorectal cancer. Ann Oncol 1996;7:961–965.
17.
Cocconi G, Cunningham D, Van Cutsem E, et al: Open, randomized, multicenter trial of raltitrexed versus fluorouracil plus high-dose leucovorin in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 1998;16:2943–2952.
18.
Ekström K, Hoffman K, Linné T, et al: Single-dose etoposide in advanced pancreatic and biliary cancer, a phase II study. Oncol Reports 1998;5:931–934.
19.
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C 30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 1993;85:365–376.
20.
Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, Winkler A: Reporting results of cancer treatment. Cancer 1981;47:207–214.
21.
Storniolo AM, Enas MH, Brown CA, et al: An investigational new drug treatment for patients with gemcitabine: Results for over 3,000 patients with pancreatic carcinoma. Cancer 1999;85:1261–1268.
22.
Cartwright TH, Cohn A, Arkey JA, et al: Phase II study of oral capecitabine in patients with advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:160–166.
23.
Fitzsimmons D, Johnson CD, George S, et al: Development of a disease specific quality of life (Qol) questionnaire module to supplement the EORTC core cancer Qol questionnaire, the QLQ-C30 in patients with pancreatic cancer. EORTC Study Group on Quality of Life. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:939–941.
24.
Neri B, Cini G, Fulignati C, et al: Weekly gemcitabine plus epirubicin as effective chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: A multicenter phase II study. Brit J Cancer 2002;87:497–501.
25.
Pazdur R, Meropol NJ, Casper E, et al: Phase II trial of ZD1694 (Tomudex) in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Invest New Drug 1996;13:355–358.
26.
Wils J, Kok T, Wagener DJTh, et al: Activity of cisplatin in adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. Eur J Cancer 1993;29:203–204.
27.
Rougier P, Ducreux M, Douillard JY, et al: Efficacy of 5FU+Cisplatin (FUP) Compared to Bolus 5FU (FU) in Advanced Pancreatic Carcinoma (APC): A Randomized Trial from the French Anticancer Centers Digestive Group (FNLCCDG). Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1999;18:A1050.
28.
Rocha-Lima CMS, Savarese D, Bruckner H, et al: Irinotecan plus gemcitabine induces both radiographic and CA 19-9 tumor marker responses in patients with previously untreated advanced pancreatic cancer. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1182–1191.
29.
Berlin J, Catalano P, Thomas J, Kugler J, Haller D, Benson III A: Phase III study of gemcitabine in combination with fluorouracil versus gemcitabine alone in patients with advanced pancreatic carcinoma: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Trial E2297. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:3270–3275.
30.
Kralidis E, Aebi S, Friess H, et al: Activity of raltitrexed and gemcitabine in advanced pancreatic cancer. Ann Oncol 2003;14:574–579.
31.
Van Laethem JL, Van Maele Ph, Polus M, et al: Raltitrexed (TOMUDEX) and gemcitabine (GEMZAR) in advanced pancreatic carcinoma: A Belgian multicenter Phase II study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2002;21:A547.
32.
Peeters M, Demols A, Van Cutsem E, et al: Raltitrexed/gemcitabine in patients with advanced biliary tract adenocarcinoma: A phase II study. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 2003;22:A1432.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.