Purpose: To determine (1) Canadian oncologists’ attitudes toward practice guidelines, (2) oncologists’ self-reported use of practice guidelines and, (3) physicians’ characteristics and attitudes associated with self-reported use of practice guidelines. Participants and Methods: A cross-sectional, self-administered postal survey was administered to Canadian oncologists. Main outcome measures were level of agreement with 8 descriptive statements about guidelines, score on the attitudinal scale of the guideline of Tunis et al., and physicians’ stated use of guideline. χ2 and logistic regression procedures were used to explore the relationship between physician characteristics and use of guidelines. Results: Over 80% of respondents agreed that they were good educational tools, convenient sources of advice, intended to improve quality of care; over 40% agreed that they were unbiased syntheses of expert opinion. Conversely, 42, 26, 20 and 16% felt they were intended to cut costs, were oversimplified cookbook medicine, were too rigid to apply to individual patients, and a challenge to physicians’ authority, respectively. Forty-one percent reported using practice guidelines routinely or most of the time. Use was associated with positive attitudes about guidelines, receiving medical school training abroad and being a radiation oncologist. Conclusion: Canadian oncologists were quite positive about practice guidelines and reported using them frequently. Our results suggest that use of guidelines by oncologists may be related to attitudes about guidelines in general, specialty within oncology and country of medical school training.

1.
Dans PE: Credibility, cookbook medicine, and common sense: Guidelines and the college. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:966–968.
2.
Charnow JA: Can guidelines reflect the realities of daily practice? ACP Observer 1990;101–107.
3.
Alper PR: ACP Guidelines for common diagnostic tests and the practising internist. J Gen Intern Med 1989;4:548–550.
4.
Lyttle J: Physicians divided over use of clinical practice guidelines. Taking the Pulse 1996;57–66.
5.
Farquhar DRE: Recipes or roadmaps? Instead of rejecting clinical practice guidelines as “cookbook” solutions, could physicians use them as roadmaps for the journey of patient care? Can Med Assoc J 1997;157:403–404.
6.
Tunis SR, Hayward RSA, Wilson MC, et al: Internists’ attitudes about clinical practice guidelines. Ann Intern Med 1994;120:956–963.
7.
Hayward RSA, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, et al: Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:1715–1723.
8.
Ferrier BM, Woodward CA, Cohen M, et al: Clinical practice guidelines. New-to-practice family physicians’ attitudes. Can Fam Physician 1996;42:463–468.
9.
Taylor KM, Macdonald KG, Ng P, et al: The black box: Physician response to breast cancer guidelines. Cancer Prev Control 1997;1:56–60.
10.
Evans WK, Newman T, Graham ID, et al: Lung cancer practice guidelines: Lessons learned and issues addressed by the Ontario Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. J Clin Oncol 1997;15:3049–3059.
11.
Grilli R, Penna A, Zola P, et al: Physicians’ views of practice guidelines, a survey of Italian physicians. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:283–287.
12.
Dillman D: Mail and telephone surveys. The total design method. New York, Wiley Interscience Publishing, 1978.
13.
Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, et al: Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Qual Health Care 1995;4:55–64.
14.
Grilli R, Lomas J: Evaluating the message: The relationship between compliance rate and the subject of a practice guideline. Med Care 1994;32:202–213.
15.
Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H: Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: Observational study. BMJ 1998;317:858–861.
16.
Hayward RS, Guyatt GH, Moore KA, McKibben KA, Kazter AO: Canadian physicians’ attitudes about and preferences regarding clinical practice guidelines. Can Med Assoc J 1997;156:1715–1723.
17.
Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, et al: Do practice guidelines guide practice? The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians. N Engl J Med 1989;321:1306–1311.
18.
Headrick LA, Speroff T, Pelecanos HI, et al: Efforts to improve compliance with the national cholesterol education program guidelines: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 1992;152:2490–2496.
19.
Weingarten S, Stone E, Hayward R, et al: The adoption of preventive care practice guidelines by primary care physicians: Do actions match intentions. J Gen Intern Med 1995;10:138–144.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.