We analyzed retrospectively the relationships and the prognostic significance of four anatomopathological features (elastosis, fibrosis, necrosis, inflammatory cell reaction) of the primary tumor in a series of 1,457 cases of infiltrating ductal carcinoma observed at our institution from January 1978 to December 1991. Necrosis, elastosis, fibrosis and inflammatory cell reaction were strongly associated among themselves (all p < 0.0001), the only exception being necrosis and elastosis. Necrosis was significantly related to tumor size (odds ratio [OR] = 5.40, p < 0.0001) and tumor grade (OR = 2.22, p < 0.0001). Univariate analysis showed that the presence of necrosis and cell reaction were significantly related to worse survival (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.03, respectively). Multivariate analysis, including the four variables plus nodal status, tumor size, grading, adjuvant therapy, age and first order interactions, revealed that greater tumor size (p < 0.0001), positive nodal status (p < 0.0001), higher histologic grade (p < 0.0001) and presence of inflammatory cell reaction (p = 0.0007) independently worsened survival. On the other hand, adjuvant therapy had a significant independent role in preventing deaths (p = 0.03). The only first-order interaction retained in the model was that between grading and cell reaction (p = 0.002). Cell reaction had a different prognostic behaviour in the groups G1-G2 and G3: in the former group, survival was worse (p = 0.0001) when the inflammatory cell reaction was present. In conclusion, we demonstrate that cell reaction is an independent prognostic factor in the G1-G2 subgroup of patients, and propose a hypothesis as to the role of cell reaction in primary breast cancer.

Keywords:
Breast cancer, Prognostic factors, Inflammatory cell reaction
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1995 S. Karger AG, Basel
1995
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.