CA 242, a sialylated carbohydrate epitope situated on the same macromole-cule as CA 50 has been proposed as a new tumour marker for pancreatic cancer (PC). The aims of the present study were: (1) to evaluate serum CA 242 versus CA 19-9 in PC patients, and (2) to assess whether these markers can predict tumour spread or patient survival. We studied 59 healthy controls, 27 PC patients, 12 chronic pancreatitis cases, 107 with extra-pancreatic gastrointestinal tumours, 30 with benign jaundice and 24 with benign extra-pancreatic gastrointestinal diseases. Mean CA 242 values were significantly higher in PC than in any other group; CA 19-9 showed a similar pattern. The best diagnostic efficacy (ROC curves analysis) in diagnosing PC was 86% for CA 242 and 84% for CA 19-9, using cut-off values of 60 and 80 U/ml, respectively. In PC, serum levels of both markers were unrelated to tumour spread or size; in PC patients with high levels of CA 242 or CA 19-9 survival was significantly shorter. CA 242 and CA 19-9 were correlated both when considering all the patients together (r = 0.962, p < 0.001) and PC alone (r = 0.880, p < 0.001). Given the very close relationship between CA 242 and CA 19-9, we tested for cross-reactivity between CA 242 antigen and CA 19-9 antibody: CA 242 antigen with CA 19-9 antibody produced a similar curve to CA 242 antigen and its corresponding antibody. In conclusion, CA 242 showed similar diagnostic value to CA 19-9 in assessing PC patients; both seem unrelated to tumour size or spread, but seem to predict survival. Their remarkably similar behaviour is due to cross-reactivity between CA 242 antigen and CA 19-9 antibody, so CA 242 cannot, in our opinion, be considered a new tumour marker for PC.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.