Objective and Methods: To investigate the neural correlates of earthquake-related stimuli among earthquake-exposed survivors, 13 earthquake-exposed undergraduates without posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and 13 matched controls completed a study-test task during which event-related potentials were recorded synchronously. Results: The earthquake-exposed group exhibited stronger P2, P300 and late positive component amplitudes to earthquake-related stimuli compared with the control group on the anterior scalp during recognition memory processing. In addition, earthquake-related stimuli elicited enhanced positivity compared with neutral stimuli in the earthquake-exposed group. Conclusion: The results indicate that earthquake-exposed subjects demonstrate recognition memory bias toward threatening stimuli. Even though both groups showed no PTSD symptoms, potential threat cues or stimuli associated with a traumatic event may trigger traumatic memories in this group.

1.
Zanarini MC, Horz S, Frankenburg FR, Weingeroff J, Reich DB, Fitzmaurice G: The 10-year course of PTSD in borderline patients and axis II comparison subjects. Acta Psychiatr Scand 2011;124:349-356.
2.
Sijbrandij M: Review: multiple session early psychological interventions after trauma do not prevent PTSD. Evid Based Ment Health 2010;13:29.
3.
Stam R: PTSD and stress sensitisation: a tale of brain and body. Part 1. Human studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007;31:530-557.
4.
Hendler T, Rotshtein P, Yeshurun Y, Weizmann T, Kahn I, Ben-Bashat D, Malach R, Bleich A: Sensing the invisible: differential sensitivity of visual cortex and amygdala to traumatic context. Neuroimage 2003;19:587-600.
5.
Lanius RA, Williamson PC, Densmore M, Boksman K, Neufeld RW, Gati JS, Menon RS: The nature of traumatic memories: a 4-T fMRI functional connectivity analysis. Am J Psychiatry 2004;161:36-44.
6.
Wei D, Qiu J, Tu S, Tian F, Su Y, Luo Y: Earthquake experience interference effects in a modified Stroop task: an ERP study. Neurosci Lett 2010;474:121-125.
7.
Lui S, Huang X, Chen L, Tang H, Zhang T, Li X, Li D, Kuang W, Chan RC, Mechelli A, Sweeney JA, Gong Q: High-field MRI reveals an acute impact on brain function in survivors of the magnitude 8.0 earthquake in China. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009;106:15412-15417.
8.
Metzger LJ, Pitman RK, Miller GA, Paige SR, Orr SP: Intensity dependence of auditory P2 in monozygotic twins discordant for Vietnam combat: associations with posttraumatic stress disorder. J Rehabil Res Dev 2008;45:437-449.
9.
Crowley KE, Colrain IM: A review of the evidence for P2 being an independent component process: age, sleep and modality. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:732-744.
10.
Johnson R Jr: On the neural generators of the P300 component of the event-related potential. Psychophysiology 1993;30:90-97.
11.
Keil A, Bradley MM, Hauk O, Rockstroh B, Elbert T, Lang PJ: Large-scale neural correlates of affective picture processing. Psychophysiology 2002;39:641-649.
12.
Miltner WH, Trippe RH, Krieschel S, Gutberlet I, Hecht H, Weiss T: Event-related brain potentials and affective responses to threat in spider/snake-phobic and non-phobic subjects. Int J Psychophysiol 2005;57:43-52.
13.
Polich J: Updating P300: an integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 2007;118:2128-2148.
14.
Wessa M, Jatzko A, Flor H: Retrieval and emotional processing of traumatic memories in posttraumatic stress disorder: peripheral and central correlates. Neuropsychologia 2006;44:1683-1696.
15.
Kimble M, Kaloupek D, Kaufman M, Deldin P: Stimulus novelty differentially affects attentional allocation in PTSD. Biol Psychiatry 2000;47:880-890.
16.
Schupp HT, Cuthbert BN, Bradley MM, Cacioppo JT, Ito T, Lang PJ: Affective picture processing: the late positive potential is modulated by motivational relevance. Psychophysiology 2000;37:257-261.
17.
Zhang Y, Kong F, Han L, Shi M, Chen H: A comparative study of earthquake- exposed middle school and undergraduate students on memory bias to threatening stimuli. Psychol Dev Educ 2012;2:52-60.
18.
Liu XC, Ma DD, Liu LQ, Zhao GF, Li CQ, Yang J, et al: Development of post- traumatic stress disorder self-rating scale and its reliability and validity. Chin J Behav Med Sci 1998;7:93-96.
19.
Zhang Y, Kong F, Wang L, Chen H, Gao X, Tan X, Chen H, Lv J, Liu Y: Mental health and coping styles of children and adolescent survivors one year after the 2008 Chinese earthquake. Child Youth Serv Rev 2010;32:1403-1409.
20.
Luck SJ: An introduction to event-related potentials and their neural origins; in Luch S (ed): An Introduction to the Event-Related Potential Technique. Cambridge, MIT Press, 2005.
21.
Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C: Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature 1996;381:520-522.
22.
Maratos EJ, Allan K, Rugg MD: Recognition memory for emotionally negative and neutral words: an ERP study. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1452-1465.
23.
Rugg MD, Wilding EL: Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends Cogn Sci 2000;4:108-115.
24.
Karle H: Global standards and accreditation in medical education: a view from the WFME. Acad Med 2006;81:S43-S48.
25.
Buckley TC, Blanchard EB, Neill WT: Information processing and PTSD: a review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev 2000;20:1041-1065.
26.
Lanius RA, Williamson PC, Densmore M, Boksman K, Gupta MA, Neufeld RW, Gati JS, Menon RS: Neural correlates of traumatic memories in posttraumatic stress disorder: a functional MRI investigation. Am J Psychiatry 2001;158:1920-1922.
27.
Han S, Northoff G: Culture-sensitive neural substrates of human cognition: a transcultural neuroimaging approach. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008;9:646-654.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.