Background/Aims: Modified rock, paper, scissors (RPS) tasks have previously been used in neuroscience to investigate activity of the prefrontal cortex (PFC). In this study, we investigated hemodynamic changes in the PFC using near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) during a modified RPS task in which each subject's successful performance rate was equalized; the workload was increased parametrically in order to reveal the resulting pattern of PFC activation. Methods: The subjects were 20 healthy adults. During RPS, the player uses hand gestures to represent rock, paper, and scissors. Rock beats scissors, paper beats rock, and scissors beats paper. In the modified RPS task, the player is instructed to lose intentionally against the computer hand; the computer goes first and the player follows. The interstimulus interval (ISI) level was adjusted with 11 steps. If the level rose, the ISI decreased and the workload increased parametrically. The maximal level (maxLv: the shortest ISI and the biggest workload) in which a subject could perform the task correctly was determined for every subject during rehearsal of the task prior to the experiment. Lowering the level from the maxLv made the task easier. Hemodynamic changes were measured by NIRS over 4 task levels (maxLv-3, maxLv-2, maxLv-1 and maxLv). Results: The hemodynamic changes in the left lateral PFC and bilateral Brodmann area 6 rose significantly with the increase in workload and presented a linear trend. Conclusion: These results suggest that PFC activation may linearly increase with increased workload during a modified RPS task in which successful performance rates of subjects are equalized.

1.
Miller EK: The prefrontal cortex and cognitive control. Nat Rev Neurosci 2000;1:59-65.
2.
Braver TS, Cohen JD, Nystrom LE, Jonides J, Smith EE, Noll DC: A parametric study of prefrontal cortex involvement in human working memory. Neuroimage 1997;5:49-62.
3.
Veltman DJ, Rombouts SA, Dolan RJ: Maintenance versus manipulation in verbal working memory revisited: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2003;18:247-256.
4.
de Zubicaray GI, Andrew C, Zelaya FO, Williams SC, Dumanoir C: Motor response suppression and the prepotent tendency to respond: a parametric fMRI study. Neuropsychologia 2000;38:1280-1291.
5.
Callicott JH, Mattay VS, Bertolino A, Finn K, Coppola R, Frank JA, Goldberg TE, Weinberger DR: Physiological characteristics of capacity constraints in working memory as revealed by functional MRI. Cereb Cortex 1999;9:20-26.
6.
Kirschen MP, Chen SH, Schraedley-Desmond P, Desmond JE: Load- and practice-dependent increases in cerebro-cerebellar activation in verbal working memory: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2005;24:462-472.
7.
Kashima H, Kato M: Tests for frontal function-pattern of frontal dysfunction and its assessment (in Japanese). Shinkei Kenkyu No Shimpo 1993;37:93-110.
8.
Matsubara M, Yamaguchi S, Xu J, Kobayashi S: Neural correlates for the suppression of habitual behavior: a functional MRI study. J Cogn Neurosci 2004;16:944-954.
9.
Fukunaga A, Ohira T, Kato M, Kashima H, Kawase T: Role of supplementary motor area during performance of loss-resulting pursuant paper-rock-scissors. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2005;25:242-250.
10.
Kikuchi S, Iwata K, Onishi Y, Kubota F, Nisijima K, Tamai H, Koizumi Y, Watanabe E, Kato S: Prefrontal cerebral activity during a simple ‘rock, paper, scissors' task measured by the noninvasive near-infrared spectroscopy method. Psychiatry Res 2007;156:199-208.
11.
Kadota H, Nakajima Y, Miyazaki M, Sekiguchi H, Kohno Y, Kansaku K: Anterior prefrontal cortex activities during the inhibition of stereotyped responses in a neuropsychological rock-paper-scissors task. Neurosci Lett 2009;453:1-5.
12.
Kadota H, Sekiguchi H, Takeuchi S, Miyazaki M, Kohno Y, Nakajima Y: The role of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in the inhibition of stereotyped responses. Exp Brain Res 2010;203:593-600.
13.
Matsumoto K, Kikuchi S, Miwakeichi F, Yamauchi Y, Ishiguro M, Watanabe E, Kato S: A sensitive indicator of hemodynamic changes in the lateral prefrontal cortex using a modified version of ‘rock, paper, scissors' as a task load. J Med Biol Eng, DOI: 10.5405/jmbe.1041.
14.
Kaneko H, Yoshikawa T, Nomura K, Ito H, Yamauchi H, Ogura M, Honjo S: Hemodynamic changes in the prefrontal cortex during digit span task: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuropsychobiology 2011;63:59-65.
15.
Watanabe E, Yamashita Y, Maki A, Ito Y, Koizumi H: Non-invasive functional mapping with multi-channel near infra-red spectroscopic topography in humans. Neurosci Lett 1996;205:41-44.
16.
Lin PY, Lin SI, Penney T, Chen JJ: Applications of near-infrared spectroscopy and imaging for motor rehabilitation in stroke patients. J Med Biol Eng 2009;29:210-221.
17.
Hatta T, Kawakami A: Patterns of handedness in modern Japanese: a cohort effect shown by re-administration of the H.N. Handedness Inventory after 20 years. Can J Exp Psychol 1995;49:505-512.
18.
van der Zee P, Cope M, Arridge SR, Essenpreis M, Potter LA, Edwards AD, Wyatt JS, McCormick DC, Roth SC, Reynolds EO: Experimentally measured optical pathlengths for the adult head, calf and forearm and the head of the newborn infant as a function of inter-optode spacing. Adv Exp Med Biol 1992;316:143-153.
19.
Tzourio-Mazoyer N, Landeau B, Papathanassiou D, Crivello F, Etard O, Delcroix N, Mazoyer B, Joliot M: Automated anatomical labeling of activations in SPM using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the MNI MRI single-subject brain. Neuroimage 2002;15:273-289.
20.
Singh AK, Okamoto M, Dan H, Jurcak V, Dan I: Spatial registration of multichannel multi-subject fNIRS data to MNI space without MRI. Neuroimage 2005;27:842-851.
21.
Tsuzuki D, Jurcak V, Singh AK, Okamoto M, Watanabe E, Dan I: Virtual spatial registration of stand-alone fNIRS data to MNI space. Neuroimage 2007;34:1506-1518.
22.
Rorden C, Brett M: Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. Behav Neurol 2000;12:191-200.
23.
Fox PT, Raichle ME: Focal physiological uncoupling of cerebral blood flow and oxidative metabolism during somatosensory stimulation in human subjects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1986;83:1140-1144.
24.
Hoshi Y, Kobayashi N, Tamura M: Interpretation of near-infrared spectroscopy signals: a study with a newly developed perfused rat brain model. J Appl Physiol 2001;90:1657-1662.
25.
Kameyama M, Fukuda M, Yamagishi Y, Sato T, Uehara T, Ito M, Suto T, Mikuni M: Frontal lobe function in bipolar disorder: a multichannel near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuroimage 2006;29:172-184.
26.
Kubota Y, Toichi M, Shimizu M, Mason RA, Findling RL, Yamamoto K, Calabrese JR: Prefrontal hemodynamic activity predicts false memory - a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Neuroimage 2006;31:1783-1789.
27.
Tanji J, Hoshi E: Role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in executive behavioral control. Physiol Rev 2008;88:37-57.
28.
Rushworth MF, Nixon PD, Renowden S, Wade DT, Passingham RE: The left parietal cortex and motor attention. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:1261-1273.
29.
Geschwind N: The apraxias: neural mechanisms of disorders of learned movement. Am Sci 1975;63:188-195.
30.
Rushworth MF, Nixon PD, Wade DT, Renowden S, Passingham RE: The left hemisphere and the selection of learned actions. Neuropsychologia 1998;36:11-24.
31.
Schluter ND, Krams M, Rushworth MF, Passingham RE: Cerebral dominance for action in the human brain: the selection of actions. Neuropsychologia 2001;39:105-113.
32.
Barbey AK, Koenigs M, Grafman J: Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. Cortex 2013;49:1195-1205.
33.
Rizzolatti G, Luppino G, Matelli M: The classic supplementary motor area is formed by two independent areas. Adv Neurol 1996;70:45-56.
34.
Tabu H, Mima T, Aso T, Takahashi R, Fukuyama H: Functional relevance of pre-supplementary motor areas for the choice to stop during Stop signal task. Neurosci Res 2011;70:277-284.
35.
Yamashita Y, Maki A, Koizumi H: Wavelength dependence of the precision of noninvasive optical measurement of oxy-, deoxy-, and total hemoglobin concentration. Med Phys 2001;28:1108-1114.
36.
Takahashi T, Takikawa Y, Kawagoe R, Shibuya S, Iwano T, Kitazawa S: Influence of skin blood flow on near-infrared spectroscopy signals measured on the forehead during a verbal fluency task. Neuroimage 2011;57:991-1002.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.