Background: Subsyndromal symptoms of depression (SSD) in patients with schizophrenia are common and clinically important. While treatment of depression in major depressive disorder may partially ameliorate cognitive deficits, the cognitive effects of antidepressant medications in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder and SSD are unknown. Methods: The goal of this study was to assess the impact of SSD and their treatment on cognition in participants with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder aged ≧40 years. Participants were randomly assigned to a flexible dose treatment with citalopram or placebo augmentation of their current medication for 12 weeks. An ANCOVA compared improvement in the cognitive composite scores, and a linear model determined the moderation of cognition on treatment effects based on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Calgary Depression Rating Scale scores between treatment groups. Results: There were no differences between the citalopram and placebo groups in changes in cognition. Baseline cognitive status did not moderate antidepressant treatment response. Conclusions: Although there are other cogent reasons why SSD in schizophrenia warrant direct intervention, treatment does not substantially affect the level of cognitive functioning. Given the effects of cognitive deficits associated with schizophrenia on functional disability, there remains an ongoing need to identify effective means of directly ameliorating them.

1.
Palmer BW, Dawes SE, Heaton RK: What do we know about neuropsychological aspects of schizophrenia? Neuropsychol Rev 2009;19:365–384.
2.
Bench CJ, Frackowiak RS, Dolan RJ: Changes in regional cerebral blood flow on recovery from depression. Psychol Med 1995;25:247–261.
3.
Mayberg HS, Brannan SK, Tekell JL, Silva JA, Mahurin RK, McGinnis S, Jerabek PA: Regional metabolic effects of fluoxetine in major depression: serial changes and relationship to clinical response. Biol Psychiatry 2000;48:830–843.
4.
Sheline YI, Barch DM, Garcia K, Gersing K, Pieper C, Welsh-Bohmer K, Steffens DC, Doraiswamy PM: Cognitive function in late life depression: relationships to depression severity, cerebrovascular risk factors and processing speed. Biol Psychiatry 2006;60:58–65.
5.
Zisook S, Kasckow JW, Golshan S, Fellows I, Solorzano E, Lehman D, Mohamed S, Jeste DV: Citalopram augmentation for subsyndromal symptoms of depression in middle-aged and older outpatients with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Psychiatry 2009;70:562–571.
6.
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR: ‘Mini-Mental State’: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 1975;12:189–198.
7.
Hamilton M: Development of a rating scale for primary depressive illness. Br J Soc Clin Psychol 1967;6:278–296.
8.
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M: Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV-TR axis I disorders, research version, patient edition with psychotic screen (scid-i/p w/psy screen). New York, Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute, 2002.
9.
Addington D, Addington J, Maticka-Tyndale E: Assessing depression in schizophrenia: the Calgary Depression Scale. Br J Psychiatry suppl 1993;39–44.
10.
Kay SR, Fiszbein A, Opler LA: The positive and negative syndrome scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987;13:261–276.
11.
Oltmanns TF, Neale JM: Schizophrenic performance when distractors are present: attentional deficit or differential task difficulty? J Abnorm Psychol 1975;84:205–209.
12.
Gladsjo JA, Schuman CC, Evans JD, Peavy GM, Miller SW, Heaton RK: Norms for letter and category fluency: demographic corrections for age, education, and ethnicity. Assessment 1999;6:147–178.
13.
Partington JE, Leiter RG: Partington’s pathway test. Psychol Serv Cent J 1949;1:9–20.
14.
Reitan RM, Wolfson D: The Halstead-Reitan Neuropsychological Test Battery: Theory and Clinical Interpretation, ed 2. Tucson, Neuropsychology Press, 1993.
15.
Cornblatt BA, Risch NJ, Faris G, Friedman D, Erlenmeyer-Kimling L: The continuous performance test, identical pairs version (CPT-IP): I. New findings about sustained attention in normal families. Psychiatry Res 1988;26:223–238.
16.
Wechsler D: Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – ed 3 (WAIS-III). Administration and scoring manual. San Antonio, The Psychological Corporation, 1997.
17.
Baron RM, Kenny DA: The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. J Pers Soc Psychol 1986;51:1173–1182.
18.
Carroll LS, Owen MJ: Genetic overlap between autism, schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Genome Med 2009;1:102.
19.
Potash JB, Bienvenu OJ: Neuropsychiatric disorders: shared genetics of bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. Nat Rev Neurol 2009;5:299–300.
20.
Lichtenstein P, Yip BH, Bjork C, Pawitan Y, Cannon TD, Sullivan PF, Hultman CM: Common genetic determinants of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in Swedish families: a population-based study. Lancet 2009;373:234–239.
21.
Tiihonen J, Wahlbeck K, Kiviniemi V: The efficacy of lamotrigine in clozapine-resistant schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res 2009;109:10–14.
22.
Elderkin-Thompson V, Mintz J, Haroon E, Lavretsky H, Kumar A: Executive dysfunction and memory in older patients with major and minor depression. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 2006;21:669–676.
23.
Harvey PD: Pharmacological cognitive enhancement in schizophrenia. Neuropsychol Rev 2009;19:324–335.
24.
Carpenter WT, Koenig JI: The evolution of drug development in schizophrenia: past issues and future opportunities. Neuropsychopharmacology 2008;33:2061–2079.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.