This prospective study was undertaken in order to establish indices of possible neurotoxicity due to the combination of lithium with haloperidol and a combination of lithium with other neuroleptics. Twenty-one subjects who were receiving neuroleptic-lithium combination were studied. Of them, 14 had a primary affective disordermanic phase, and 7 had schizophrenia as judged by Feighner criteria. The subjects were evaluated on clinical, neuropsychological measures and EEG at baseline and 10–14 days after addition of lithium to the neuroleptic regimen. Of 11 subjects receiving the haloperidol-lithium combination, 5 (45.4%) showed abnormal responses on EEG. Of these 5 subjects, 3 showed abnormal photic responses, and 2 showed slowing in posterior alpha activity. These photoparoxysmal and photomyoclonic responses are indicative of cerebral pathophysiology resulting from the interactive effect of the haloperidol-lithium combination. The photic and other associated EEG abnormalities reported may be the earliest indication of neurotoxicity. No significant changes were observed in the EEG in 10 subjects treated with other neuroleptic-lithium combinations. In a statistical comparison the haloperidol-lithium combination had significantly more frequent EEG changes than the combination of lithium with other neuroleptics. This study presents sufficient evidence from reported photic and other associated EEG changes to pursue further investigation of neurotoxicity due to haloperidol-lithium therapy. Such a study should employ a larger number of subjects, random assignment of subjects to treatment and control groups, and blind evaluation of data.

Keywords:
EEG, Lithium, Haloperidol, Neurotoxicity, Photoparoxysmal, Photomyoclonic, Neuroleptic
This content is only available via PDF.
© 1988 S. Karger AG, Basel
1988
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.