The transient visual-evoked potentials (VEP), recorded in patients suffering from generalized epilepsy, can be characterized by a duplication of the negative peak with a latency of 70–100 ms, a strong increase in amplitude of the negative peak between 80 and 130 ms and the development of a high amplitude slow negative wave following the primary complex. In this study we have investigated to which degree these changes are influenced by the intravenous administration of clonazepam and sodium valproate. Therefore, VEPs were registered in 30 patients, suffering from generalized epilepsy, just before and immediately after the intravenous injection of 0.4–0.8 mg clonazepam and further at 15, 30 and 16 min thereafter. The same procedure was applied on 10 patients treated with an intravenous injection of 400 mg sodium valproate. In both groups we found more or less a reduction in number and degree of the mentioned VEP changes. The improvement was associated with a strong decrease in amplitude of the VEP components in the group treated with clonazepam but was not seen in the sodium valproate group.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.