Background: The optimal arterial oxygen saturation in the first weeks of life is unknown for immature newborn infants. Objectives: To determine the effect of targeting high versus low oxygen saturation in the first weeks of life on the outcome of very low and extremely low birth weight infants. Methods: Randomized and observational studies were sought that compared the outcomes in babies with high or low oxygen saturation targeting assessed by pulse oximetry. Results: Ten studies were identified, of which 8 had severe retinopathy of prematurity (n = 3,811) and 8 had bronchopulmonary dysplasia/lung problems (n = 4,612) as outcomes. Two studies also provided survival data. The relative risk (RR) in favor of low SpO2 was 0.42 (95% CI 0.34–0.51) for severe retinopathy of prematurity, 0.73 (95% CI 0.63–0.86) for bronchopulmonary dysplasia/lung problems, and 1.12 (95% CI 0.86–1.45) for mortality. There was 1 randomized trial with retinopathy of prematurity, 3 with bronchopulmonary dysplasia/lung problems, and 1 with mortality as the outcome. When analyzing the randomized trial separately, the RR (95% CI) for severe retinopathy of prematurity was 0.48 (0.34–0.68), for bronchopulmonary dyslasia/lung problems it was 0.79 (0.64–0.97), and for mortality it was 1.27(1.01–1.60). Conclusions: A low oxygen saturation approach reduces severe retinopathy of prematurity by 50%, i.e. from 20.9 to 9.5%, and bronchopulmonary dysplasia/lung problems by 25%, i.e. from 40.8 to 29.7%. Further randomized trials are needed to provide definite conclusions and to assess whether reducing oxygen saturation has an impact on mortality among very and extremely low birth weight infants.

This content is only available via PDF.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.