Background: Evidence from European centres to support the use of nitric oxide (NO) in mature newborns with evidence of severe respiratory failure is sparse. Methods: Infants of >33 weeks’ gestation, <28 days old, and with severe respiratory failure requiring ventilatory support were randomised to receive or not to receive inhaled NO (iNO). The study was not blinded. Results: Sixty infants were recruited (29 allocated iNO, 31 no iNO) from 15 neonatal units in the UK, Finland, Belgium and the Republic of Ireland. 15/60 recruited babies died, and 8.1% of the survivors (4/45) were classified as severely disabled at 1 year. There was no statistically significant difference between the randomised groups in terms of the primary outcome of death or severe disability by the corrected age of 1 year (relative risk = 0.96 (95% confidence interval = 0.46–2.03); p = 0.86) (Fisher’s exact p = 1.00). The costs of NO were outweighed by reduced extra corporeal membrane oxygenation costs in the iNO group. The mean total hospitalisation costs were lower in the iNO group, although the mean difference (£1,697) was not statistically significant (95% confidence interval = –14,472 to 11,478). Conclusions: The results complement those of previous studies that suggest NO is cost-effective and reduces the need for extra corporeal membrane oxygenation in this group of babies. Overall survival rates compare unfavourably with results of US trials.

Keywords:
Neonatal intensive care, Nitric oxide, Ventilation, Term infants, Respiratory failure
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.