For a number of reasons there is a need to explore reliable non-invasive methods for assessing bone health in neonates and young infants. Epidemiological studies suggest that early events in life may predispose the adult to degenerative diseases such as osteoporosis. Preterm infants have an increased risk of low bone mass because of limited bone mass accretion in utero and a greater need for bone nutrients. Despite improvements in neonatal care fractures still occur. The diagnosis of osteopaenia of prematurity remains difficult as there is no screening test which is both sensitive and specific. Biochemical indices are non-diagnostic, and plain X-rays in the absence of fractures are poor at diagnosing bone disease. Although dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is increasingly used to assess bone mineral status in newborn infants, the size and immobility of the scanner, the length of time to perform the scan and use of ionising radiation make it unsuitable for routine use in the setting of the fragile very low birth weight infant. Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) was first developed in 1984, as a non-ionising, portable and low cost method of assessing bone health. The measurements obtained from QUS are thought to be related not only to the mineral density of the bone but also to reflect parameters of bone quality and strength. Preliminary studies suggest that this technique may be a useful method of assessing changes in bone health in preterm infants, but the data need to be interpreted carefully. This review will concentrate on the methodology of QUS and the studies that have already been performed in neonates.

Keywords:
Metabolic bone disease, Osteopaenia, Speed of sound, Prematurity
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel
2006
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.