To understand the pathogenesis of meconium aspiration syndrome, we compared the pulmonary and inflammatory effects of the water and lipid extracts of human meconium instilled into the lungs of newborn piglets. The piglets were artificially ventilated, made hypoxemic, and randomized into three groups. At start of reoxygenation, 3 ml/kg of one of the following mixtures was instilled intratracheally: (1) meconium (n = 12); (2) water extract of meconium (n = 12), and (3) lipid extract of meconium (n = 12). During 8 h of reoxygenation, hemodynamics, pulmonary gas exchange, lung mechanics, and interleukin-8 concentrations in tracheobronchial aspirates were monitored. Oxygenation index (p = 0.04) and mean airway pressure (p = 0.04) increased more in the lipid extract group than in the water extract group. Dynamic compliance and mean arterial blood pressure decreased (p < 0.05) in the meconium and lipid extract groups, but not in the water extract group. At 8 h of reoxygenation, the interleukin-8 concentration in the tracheobronchial aspirates was three times higher in the lipid extract group as compared with the water extract group (110 ± 102 vs. 37 ± 27 pg/ml; p = 0.02). In conclusion, pulmonary dysfunction in meconium aspiration syndrome is caused by both the water- and lipid-soluble fractions of meconium, with stronger inflammatory and more detrimental effects promoted by the lipid extract than the water extract.

Keywords:
Lipids, Bile acids, Hypoxemia, Meconium aspiration, Piglets, meconium aspiration syndrome
This content is only available via PDF.
© 2003 S. Karger AG, Basel
2003
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.