Abstract
Background: The QRS axis represents the sum and orientation of the ventricular depolarization. Accurate interpretation of abnormalities in the QRS axis may facilitate early diagnosis of heart disease in newborns. We aimed at describing the evolution of the QRS axis during the first 4 weeks of life and provide reference values from healthy newborns. Methods: The Copenhagen Baby Heart Study is a prospective general population study that offered cardiac evaluation during the first month of life to all newborns delivered in the Copenhagen area. Results: Electrocardiograms from 12,317 newborns (52% boys; mean age 12 days) with normal echocardiograms were included. The median QRS axis was 119° at the ages 0–7 days and shifted leftward to 102° at the ages 22–28 days (p < 0.001). We found that girls had a significantly less pronounced right-shifted axis than boys (p < 0.001) and that increasing gestational age (GA) was associated with a more pronounced right-shifted axis (p < 0.05). Infant size did not affect the axis (p > 0.05). Only 0.5% had an axis within the interval 0 to −90° and 1.1% in the interval +240 to +30°. Conclusions: The QRS axis showed a gradual leftward-shift during the first 4 weeks of life and was affected by sex and GA but unaffected by infant size. Less than 1% of the newborns had a QRS axis between 0 and −90°. This study represents updated reference values, which may facilitate the clinical handling of newborns.
References
1.
Ravi
P
, Ashwath
R
, Strainic
J
, Li
H
, Steinberg
J
, Snyder
C
. Clinical and financial impact of ordering an echocardiogram in children with left axis deviation on their electrocardiogram
. Congenit Heart Dis
. 2016 Mar
;11
(2
):110
–4
. .2.
Kashou
AH
, Basit
H
, Chhabra
L
. Electrical axis (normal, right axis deviation, and left axis deviation)
: StatPearls Publishing
; 2019
. [cited 2019 Oct 1]. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK470532/.3.
Rijnbeek
PR
, Witsenburg
M
, Schrama
E
, Hess
J
, Kors
JA
. New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram
. Eur Heart J
. 2001 Apr
;22
(8
):702
–11
. .4.
Tipple
M
. Interpretation of electrocardiograms in infants and children
. Images Paediatr Cardiol
. 1999
;1
(1
):3
–13
.5.
Burnett
CT
, Taylor
EL
. Electrocardiograms on 167 average healthy infants and children
. Am Heart J
. 1936 Feb
;11
(2
):185
–205
. .6.
Davignon
A
, Rautaharju
P
, Boisselle
E
, Soumis
F
, Mégélas
M
, Choquette
A
. Normal ECG standards for infants and children
. Pediatr Cardiol
. 1980 Feb
;1
(2
):123
–31
. .7.
Gup
AM
, Franklin
RB
, Hill
JE
. The vectorcardiogram in children with left axis deviation and no apparent heart disease
. Am Heart J
. 1965 May
;69
(5
):619
–23
. .8.
Chou
FS
, Johnson
AJ
, Ghimire
LV
. The significance of left axis deviation in the pediatric population: a meta-analysis
. Pediatr Cardiol
. 2019 Apr
;40
(4
):677
–84
. .9.
Schneider
AE
, Cannon
BC
, Johnson
JN
, Ackerman
MJ
, Wackel
PL
. Left axis deviation in children without previously known heart disease
. Pediatrics
. 2018 Mar
;141
(3
):e20171970
. .10.
Shinebourne
EA
, Haworth
SG
, Anderson
RH
, Ulgur
A
. Differential diagnosis of congenital heart disease in the first 3 months of life. Significance of superior (left) QRS axis
. Arch Dis Child
. 1974 Sep
;49
(9
):729
–33
. .11.
Brink
AJMD
, Neill
CAMD
. The electrocardiogram in congenital heart disease: with special reference to left axis deviation
. Circulation
. 1955 Oct
;12
(4
):604
–11
.12.
Calcaterra
G
, Puglisi
R
. Left axis deviation in healthy infants and children
. Int J Cardiol
. 1989 Aug
;24
(2
):236
–8
. .13.
Sillesen
AS
, Raja
AA
, Pihl
C
, Vøgg
ROB
, Hedegaard
M
, Emmersen
P
, et al. Copenhagen baby heart study: a population study of newborns with prenatal inclusion
. Eur J Epidemiol
. 2019 Jan
;34
(1
):79
–90
. .14.
Pærregaard
MM
, Hvidemose
SO
, Pihl
C
, Sillesen
A-S
, Parvin
SB
, Pietersen
A
, et al. Defining the normal QT interval in newborns: the natural history and reference values for the first 4 weeks of life
. Europace
. 2020 Sep 17
;euaa143
.15.
Saarel
EV
, Granger
S
, Kaltman
JR
, Minich
LL
, Tristani-Firouzi
M
, Kim
JJ
, et al. Electrocardiograms in healthy North American children in the digital age
. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol
. 2018
;11
(7
):e005808
. .16.
Abreu-Lima
C
, Marques de Sa
JP
, Coelho
G
, Almeida
J
, Silva-Carvalho
F
, Hernandez
C
. Frontal-plane QRS axis revisited: accuracy of current approximations and reappraisal of their merit in the diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy
. J Electrocardiol
. 1988 Nov
;21
(4
):369
–75
. .17.
Simonson
E
, Blackburn
H
, Puchner
TC
, Eisenberg
P
, Ribeiro
F
, Meja
M
. Sex differences in the electrocardiogram
. Circulation
. 1960 Oct
;22
(4
):598
–601
. .18.
Wershing
JM
, Walker
CH
. Influence of age, sex, and body habitus on the mean qrs electrical axis in childhood and adolescence
. Br Heart J
. 1963 Sep
;25
(5
):601
–9
. .19.
Dougherty
JD
, Stoudt
HW
. The relation of frontal QRS axis to age and body build
. J Electrocardiol
. 1970 Jan
;3
(3–4
):285
–98
. .20.
Howard
R
, Gertler
MM
. Axis deviation and body build
. Am Heart J
. 1952 Jul
;44
(1
):35
–41
. .21.
Cox
DJ
, Bai
W
, Price
AN
, Edwards
AD
, Rueckert
D
, Groves
AM
. Ventricular remodeling in preterm infants: computational cardiac magnetic resonance atlasing shows significant early remodeling of the left ventricle
. Pediatr Res
. 2019 May
;85
(6
):807
–15
. .22.
Hastreiter
AR
, Abella
JB
. The electrocardiogram in the newborn period. I. the normal infant
. J Pediatr
. 1971 Jan
;78
(1
):146
–56
. .23.
Schmer
V
, Mogos
C
, Gudavalli
M
, Sutija
VG
, Tugertimur
A
. Ventricular dominance patterns in preterm infants
. J Perinat Med
. 1999
;27
(4
):287
–91
. .24.
Thomaidis
C
, Varlamis
G
, Karamperis
S
. Comparative study of the electrocardiograms of healthy fullterm and premature newborns
. Acta Paediatr Scand
. 1988 Sep
;77
(5
):653
–7
. .25.
St John Sutton
MG
, Raichlen
JS
, Reichek
N
, Huff
DS
. Quantitative assessment of right and left ventricular growth in the human fetal heart: a pathoanatomic study
. Circulation
. 1984 Dec
;70
(6
):935
–41
. .© 2021 S. Karger AG, Basel
2021
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
