Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of early total enteral feeding (ETEF) when compared with conventional enteral feeding (CEF) in stable very-low-birth-weight (VLBW; 1,000–1,499 g) infants on the postnatal age (in days) at attaining full enteral feeds. Methods: In this unblinded randomised controlled trial, 180 infants were allocated to an ETEF (n = 91) or a CEF group (n = 89). Feeds were initiated as total enteral feeds in the ETEF group and as minimal enteral nutrition (20 mL/kg) in the CEF group. The rest of the day’s requirement in the CEF group was provided as parenteral fluids. The primary outcome was postnatal age at attaining full enteral feeds. The secondary outcomes included episodes of feed intolerance, incidence of sepsis and necrotising enterocolitis (NEC), and duration of hospital stay. Results: The baseline variables including birth weight and gestational age were similar in the two groups. The infants of the ETEF group attained full enteral feeds earlier than those of the CEF group (6.5 ± 1.5 vs. 10.1 ± 4.1 days postnatal age; mean difference –3.6 [–4.5 to –2.7]; p < 0.001). Total episodes of feed intolerance and clinical sepsis were fewer, with a shorter duration of hospital stay, in the ETEF group (15.5 vs. 19.6 days) (p = 0.01). The incidence of NEC was similar in the two groups. Conclusion: ETEF in stable VLBW infants results in earlier attainment of full feeds and decreases the duration of hospital stay without any increased risk of feed intolerance or NEC.
References
1.
Puntis
JW
. Nutritional support in the premature newborn
. Postgrad Med J
. 2006
Mar
;82
(965
):192
–8
.
[PubMed]
0032-54732.
Rayyis
SF
, Ambalavanan
N
, Wright
L
, Carlo
WA
. Randomized trial of “slow” versus “fast” feed advancements on the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
. J Pediatr
. 1999
Mar
;134
(3
):293
–7
.
[PubMed]
0022-34763.
Caple
J
, Armentrout
D
, Huseby
V
, Halbardier
B
, Garcia
J
, Sparks
JW
, et al. Randomized, controlled trial of slow versus rapid feeding volume advancement in preterm infants
. Pediatrics
. 2004
Dec
;114
(6
):1597
–600
.
[PubMed]
0031-40054.
Smith
LE
, Hard
AL
, Hellström
A
. The biology of retinopathy of prematurity: how knowledge of pathogenesis guides treatment
. Clin Perinatol
. 2013
Jun
;40
(2
):201
–14
.
[PubMed]
0095-51085.
Morgan
J
, Young
L
, McGuire
W
. Delayed introduction of progressive enteral feeds to prevent necrotising enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
. Cochrane Database Syst Rev
. 2014
;12
(12
):CD001970
.
[PubMed]
1469-493X6.
Härtel
C
, Haase
B
, Browning-Carmo
K
, Gebauer
C
, Kattner
E
, Kribs
A
, et al. Does the enteral feeding advancement affect short-term outcomes in very low birth weight infants?
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr
. 2009
Apr
;48
(4
):464
–70
.
[PubMed]
0277-21167.
Flidel-Rimon
O
, Friedman
S
, Lev
E
, Juster-Reicher
A
, Amitay
M
, Shinwell
ES
. Early enteral feeding and nosocomial sepsis in very low birthweight infants
. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
. 2004
Jul
;89
(4
):F289
–92
.
[PubMed]
1359-29988.
Salhotra
A
, Ramji
S
. Slow versus fast enteral feed advancement in very low birth weight infants: a randomized control trial
. Indian Pediatr
. 2004
May
;41
(5
):435
–41
.
[PubMed]
0019-60619.
Krishnamurthy
S
, Gupta
P
, Debnath
S
, Gomber
S
. Slow versus rapid enteral feeding advancement in preterm newborn infants 1000-1499 g: a randomized controlled trial
. Acta Paediatr
. 2010
Jan
;99
(1
):42
–6
.
[PubMed]
0803-525310.
Sanghvi
KP
, Joshi
P
, Nabi
F
, Kabra
N
. Feasibility of exclusive enteral feeds from birth in VLBW infants [{GT}]1200 g—an RCT
. Acta Paediatr
. 2013
Jul
;102
(7
):e299
–304
.
[PubMed]
0803-525311.
Berseth
CL
, Bisquera
JA
, Paje
VU
. Prolonging small feeding volumes early in life decreases the incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis in very low birth weight infants
. Pediatrics
. 2003
Mar
;111
(3
):529
–34
.
[PubMed]
0031-400512.
Karagianni
P
, Briana
DD
, Mitsiakos
G
, Elias
A
, Theodoridis
T
, Chatziioannidis
E
, et al. Early versus delayed minimal enteral feeding and risk for NEC in preterm growth restricted infantswith abnormal antenatal Doppler results
. Am J Perinatol
. 2010
;27
:367
–73
.
[PubMed]
0735-163113.
Hook
B
, Smith
K
, Swank
P
, Miller
C
, Denson
S
, Landry
S.
Is the Length of Time to Attain Full Feedings in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Infants Related to Early Medical Complications and/or Developmental Outcome at 24 Months? Ped Res1997 abstract; 41, 19914.
Nangia
S
, Bishnoi
A
, Goel
A
, Mandal
P
, Tiwari
S
, Saili
A
. Early Total Enteral Feeding in Stable Very Low Birth Weight Infants: A Before and After Study
. J Trop Pediatr
. 2018
Feb
;64
(1
):24
–30
.
[PubMed]
0142-633815.
Ballard
JL
, Khoury
JC
, Wedig
K
, Wang
L
, Eilers-Walsman
BL
, Lipp
R
. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants
. J Pediatr
. 1991
Sep
;119
(3
):417
–23
.
[PubMed]
0022-347616.
Singh
M
, Giri
SK
, Ramachandran
K
. Intrauterine growth curves of live born single babies
. Indian Pediatr
. 1974
Jul
;11
(7
):475
–9
.
[PubMed]
0019-606117.
Walsh
MC
, Kliegman
RM
. Necrotizing enterocolitis: treatment based on staging criteria
. Pediatr Clin North Am
. 1986
Feb
;33
(1
):179
–201
.
[PubMed]
0031-395518.
Brierley
J
, Carcillo
JA
, Choong
K
, et al. Crit Care Med. Clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock: 2007
update from the American College of Critical Care Medicine. 2009 Feb;37(2):666-8819.
Mittal
K
, Gupta
V
, Khanna
P
, Kaushik
JS
, Sharma
A
. Evaluation of Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) algorithm for diagnosis and referral in under-five children
. Indian J Pediatr
. 2014
Aug
;81
(8
):797
–9
.
[PubMed]
0019-545620.
Da Silva
O
, Ohlsson
A
, Kenyon
C
. Accuracy of leukocyte indices and C-reactive protein for diagnosis of neonatal sepsis: a critical review
. Pediatr Infect Dis J
. 1995
May
;14
(5
):362
–6
.
[PubMed]
0891-366821.
Mahale
R
, Dutta
S
, Ahluwalia
J
, Kishore
SS
, Narang
A
. Baseline illness severity does not alter accuracy of neonatal sepsis screen
. Am J Perinatol
. 2010
Apr
;27
(4
):327
–32
.
[PubMed]
0735-163122.
Papile
LA
, Burstein
J
, Burstein
R
, Koffler
H
. Incidence and evolution of subependymal and intraventricular hemorrhage: a study of infants with birth weights less than 1,500 gm
. J Pediatr
. 1978
Apr
;92
(4
):529
–34
.
[PubMed]
0022-347623.
International Committee for the Classification of retinopathy ofPrematurity. International classification of retinopathy of prematurityrevisited
. Arch Ophthalmol
. 2005
;123
:91
–9
.0003-995024.
Skelton
R
, Evans
N
, Smythe
J
. A blinded comparison of clinical and echocardiographic evaluation of the preterm infant for patent ductus arteriosus
. J Paediatr Child Health
. 1994
Oct
;30
(5
):406
–11
.
[PubMed]
1034-481025.
Kandasamy
Y
. Infection control during administration of parenteral nutrition in preterm babies
. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed
. 2009
Jan
;94
(1
):F78
.
[PubMed]
1359-299826.
Berseth
CL
. Neonatal small intestinal motility: motor responses to feeding in term and preterm infants
. J Pediatr
. 1990
Nov
;117
(5
):777
–82
.
[PubMed]
0022-347627.
Coombs
RC
, Morgan
ME
, Durbin
GM
, Booth
IW
, McNeish
AS
. Gut blood flow velocities in the newborn: effects of patent ductus arteriosus and parenteral indomethacin
. Arch Dis Child
. 1990
Oct
;65
(10 Spec No
):1067
–71
.
[PubMed]
0003-9888© 2019 S. Karger AG, Basel
2019
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.
