This is the third of three papers investigating the legislative history concerning infanticide. After Antiquity and the Middle Ages, this paper focuses on legislative reforms during the last 400 years. Despite dreadful punishment, the practice remained frequent until safe abortion became available. In the 17th century, the rate of executions of women for this crime was 1 per 100,000 inhabitants. The actual incidence greatly exceeded this figure. The death penalty failed to deter, and punishing fornication promoted rather than prevented infanticide. Well into the 18th century, severely malformed infants were killed. The lung flotation test, albeit unreliable, was used to save the mother from the death penalty. When the motives for infanticide - poverty, shame, despair, and preserving honour - became understood in the late 18th century, the image of the ‘child murderess' changed, and infanticide shifted from constituting a capital crime to a privileged delict. Illegitimate pregnancy was no longer punished, and lying-in hospitals for pregnant unmarried women and foundling hospitals for their children were established. Specific infanticide laws were issued in Prussia in 1756, Britain in 1803, and France in 1811. Once psychosis and denial of pregnancy became understood, severe penalties were no longer issued. The justifications for lenient legislation included social circumstances, difficult proof, and curtailed protection of the newborn due to its illegitimacy, helplessness, and diminished awareness. Thoughts on the limited right to live of newborn infants are still hampering ethical decisions when the beginning and end of life are near each other.

1.
Obladen M: From right to sin: laws on infanticide in Antiquity. Neonatology 2016;109:56-61.
2.
Obladen M: From sin to crime: laws on infanticide in the Middle Ages. Neonatology 2016;109:85-90.
3.
Verstegan R: A Restitution of Decayed Intelligence, in Antiquities, concerning the Most Noble, and Renowned English Nation (ed 1, 1606), ed 3. London, T Newcomb for Joshua Kirton, 1653, p 45.
4.
Hopkirk M: Nobody Wanted Sam. The Story of the Unwelcomed Child, 1530-1948. London, John Murray, 1949.
5.
Wagner HL: Die Kindermörderin: Ein Trauerspiel. Leipzig, Schwickert, 1776.
6.
Schiller F: The infanticide (1782); in: Poems (translated by EP Arnold-Forster). London, W Heinemann, 1901, pp 20-23.
7.
Pestalozzi JH: Ueber Gesetzgebung und Kindermord. Wahrheiten und Träume, Nachforschungen und Bilder. Frankfurt/Leipzig, Buchhandlung der Gelehrten 1783, pp 4, 150.
8.
Prosperi A: Die Gabe der Seele. Geschichte eines Kindsmordes. Frankfurt/Main, Suhrkamp, 2007.
9.
Habermas R: Das Frankfurter Gretchen. Der Prozess gegen die Kindsmörderin Susanna Margaretha Brandt. München, CH Beck, 1999.
10.
Michalik K: Kindsmord. Sozialverhalten und Rechtsgeschichte der Kindstötung im 18. und beginnenden 19. Jahrhundert am Beispiel Preussen. Diss. Hamburg 1995. Pfaffenweiler, Centaurus, 1997, pp 448-460.
11.
Dülmen RV: Frauen vor Gericht: Kindsmord in der frühen Neuzeit. Frankfurt/Main, Fischer Taschenbuch, 1991, pp 30, 49-51.
12.
Zedler JH: Grosses vollständiges Universallexikon (reprint Graz 1982). Leipzig/Halle, Johann Heinrich Zedler, 1739, vol 21, columns 486-491.
13.
Frölich von Frölichsburg JC: Commentarius in Kaysers Carl des Fünfften und des h. Röm. Reichs Peinliche Halsgerichts-Ordnung. Ulm, Johann Conrad Wohler, 1759, vol 2, titul 11, art 14, p 174.
14.
Galen: On the Usefulness of the Parts of the Body (translated from the Greek with an introduction and commentary by Margaret Tallmadge May). Ithaca/New York, Cornell University Press, 1968, vol 2, book 15, cap 6, p 670.
15.
Swammerdam J: Tractatus physico-anatomico-medicus de respiratione usuque pulmonum (ed 1, 1667). Lugduni Batavorum, Apud Joannem van der Linden, 1679, p 41.
16.
Rayger C: Observatio CCII quibusdam in dissectione recens natorum observatis; in: Miscellanea curiosa medico-physica Academiae Naturae Curiosorum, sive Ephemeridium Medico-Physicarum Germanicarum. Francofurti/Lipsiae, Sumptibus Johannis Friderici Gleditsch, 1688, vol 6/7 (containing the years 1675 and 1676), pp 295-297.
17.
Schreyer J: Erörterung und Erläuterung der Frage, ob es ein gewiss Zeichen, wenn eines todten Kindes Lunge im Wasser untersincket, dass solches in Mutter-Leibe gestorben sey? Zeitz, Johann Heinrich Ammersbacher, 1690.
18.
Blumenstok L: Zum 200jährigen Jubiläum der Lungenprobe. Vjschr gerichtl Med NF 1883;38/39:252-269, 1-11.
19.
Bohn J: De officio medici duplici, clinici nimirium ac forensis. Lipsiae/Jo, Friedrich Gleditsch, 1704, pp 662-670.
20.
Camper P: Abhandlung von den Kennzeichen des Lebens und des Todes bey neugebornen Kindern. Frankfurt/Leipzig, Heinrich Ludwig Brönner, 1777, pp 80-88.
21.
Krammer L: Streit und Widerstreit um die Beweiskraft der Lungenschwimmprobe in geschichtlicher Darstellung. Sudhoffs Arch Gesch Med 1933;26:253-276.
22.
Walcher K: Das Neugeborene in forensischer Hinsicht. Gerichtliche Medizin in Einzeldarstellungen. 1. Berlin, Springer, 1941, pp 3-7.
23.
Hattenhauer H: Allgemeines Landrecht für die preussischen Staaten von 1794, ed 2. Neuwied, Luchterhand, 1994, pp 707-711.
24.
Brownlow J: The History and Design of the Foundling Hospital (with a memoir of the founder). London, W & HS Warr, 1858.
25.
Jackson M: Infanticide. Historical Perspectives on Child Murder and Concealment, 1550-2000. Aldershot, Ashgate Publishing Co, 2002.
26.
Davies DS: Child-killing in English law. Modern Law Review 1937;1:203-217.
27.
Behlmer GK: Deadly motherhood: infanticide and medical opinion in Mid-Victorian England. Hist Med Allied Sci 1979;34:403-427.
28.
Pinchbeck I, Hewitt M: Children in English Society. From the Eighteenth Century to the Children Act 1948. London, Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1973, vol 2, p 598.
29.
Damme C: Infanticide: the worth of an infant under law. Med Hist 1978;22:1-24.
30.
Steckel RH: A dreadful childhood: the excess mortality of American slaves. Soc Sci Hist 1986;10:427-465.
31.
Beisel N, Kay T: Abortion, race, and gender in nineteenth-century America. Am Sociol 2004;69:498-518.
32.
Vallaud D: Le crime d'infanticide et l'indulgence des cours d'assises en France au XIXème siècle. Soc Sci Inf (Paris) 1982;21:475-499.
33.
Remacle B-B: Des hospices d'enfans trouvés en Europe, et principalement en France, depuis leur origine jusqu'a nos jours. Paris, Treuttel et Würtz, 1838, p 221.
34.
Lalou R: L'infanticide devant les tribunaux français (1825-1910). Communications 1986;44:175-200.
35.
Donovan JM: Infanticide and the juries in France, 1825-1913. J Fam Hist 1991;16:157-176.
36.
Tursz A, Cook JM: A population-based survey of neonaticides using judicial data. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2011;96:F259-F263.
37.
Barrow J: Travels in China. London, T Cadell and W Davies, 1804, pp 167-173.
38.
Wilson J: History of the suppression of infanticide in Western India under the Government of Bombay. Bombay, Smith, Taylor & Co, 1855, pp 28-46, 198.
39.
Vishwanath LS: Female infanticide. The colonial experience. Econ Polit Wkly 2004;39:2313-2318.
40.
Kant I: Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Rechtslehre. 1797; in Weischedel W (ed): Immanuel Kant. Werke in 6 Bänden. Hamburg, Hoffmann & Campe, 1799, vol 4, p 458.
41.
Singer P: Practical Ethics. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1979.
42.
Engelhardt HT Jr: Euthanasia and children: the injury of continued existence. J Pediatr 1973;83:170-171.
43.
Tooley M: Infanticide; in La Follette H (ed): The International Encyclopedia of Ethics. Malden, Wiley-Blackwell, 2013, vol 5, pp 2604-2607.
44.
Levy N: The moral significance of being born. J Med Ethics 2013;39:326-329.
45.
Shinwell ES: Ethics of birth at the limits of viability: the risky business of prediction. Neonatology 2015;107:317-320.
46.
Esquirol E: De l'aliénation mentale des nouvelles accouchées et des nourrices (1819); in: Des maladies mentales considérées sous le rapport médical, hygiénique et médico-légal. Paris, Baillière, 1838, pp 230-273.
47.
Marcé LV: Traité de la folie des femmes enceintes, des nouvelles accouchées et des nourrices. Paris, Baillière, 1858, pp 141-144.
48.
Wessel J, Büscher U: Denial of pregnancy: population-based study. Brit Med J 2002;324:458.
49.
Brezinka C, Huter O, Biebl W, Kinzl J: Denial of pregnancy: obstetrical aspects. J Psychosom Obstet Gynecol 1994;15:1-8.
50.
Vellut N, Cook JM, Tursz A: Analysis of the relationship between neonaticide and denial of pregnancy using data from judicial files. Child Abuse Negl 2012;36:553-563.
51.
Overpeck M: Epidemiology of infanticide; in Spinelli MG (ed): Infanticide. Psychosocial and Legal Perspectives on Mothers who Kill. Washington/London, American Psychiatric Publishing, 2003, pp 19-31.
52.
Finer LB, Zolna MR: Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006. Contraception 2011;84:478-485.
53.
Singh S, Sedgh G, Hussain R: Unintended pregnancy: worldwide levels, trends, and outcomes. Stud Fam Plann 2010;41:241-250.
54.
Tardieu A: Etude médico-légale sur l'infanticide. Paris, Baillière, 1868, pp 50-53, plates 1-3.
55.
Chodowiecki D: Whipping of illegitimate mothers (copper etching, frontispiece); in Salzmann CG (ed): Carl von Carlsberg. Über das menschliche Elend. Leipzig, Siegfried Lebrecht Crusius, 1783, vol 1.
56.
Redgrave R: The Outcast (oil on canvas). London, Royal Academy of Arts, 1851.
57.
Peters R: Der Schutz des neugeborenen, insbesondere des missgebildeten Kindes; in: Medizin in Recht und Ethik. Stuttgart, Enke, 1988, vol 18.
Copyright / Drug Dosage / Disclaimer
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.
Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.
Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.
You do not currently have access to this content.